Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 01:11 UTC

mpizenberg / elm-test-rs

Fast and portable executable to run your Elm tests

Rust · JavaScript · ElmBSD-3-Clause★ 94 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Apr 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

mpizenberg/elm-test-rs holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (51/100). It was last updated 54 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Matthieu PizenbergPersonal account
170 followers130 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmelm-test-rs3.2.0-04,4401054 days agoelmelm-testclirust

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 54 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
10.6/18Commit volume14 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year14
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push54
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases25 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 54 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~196.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv3.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release54
mean_days_between_releases196.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.9/60Stars94 stars
9.3/25Forks14 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars94
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.6/80Monthly downloads4,440 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageselm-test-rs
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,440
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth11 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.891
How it's scored
34/42Issue resolution81% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance74/82 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs74
open_issues12
closed_issues51
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.81
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
16.1/25Owner reach170 followers of mpizenberg
25/25Track record130 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers170
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmpizenberg
public_repos130
account_age_days5,030
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history10 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageselm-test-rs
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.8/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages6
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:elm-test-rs@3.2.0-0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 6 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.5/40Legible commit history38 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.384
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/22 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes16,765
source_files_sampled22
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

94GitHub stars
11contributors
14commits, last 12 months
54days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
12open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'elm-test-rs' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151412020-042023-062026-08
Major 0Minor 2Patch 10

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 01:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
3CI-Tests4 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioglob0.3.0Cargo.toml
crates.iopathdiff0.2.1Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_cpus1.13.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.5.5Cargo.toml
crates.iopubgrub0.2.1Cargo.toml
crates.iopubgrub-dependency-provider-elmCargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.72Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.130Cargo.toml
crates.ioureq2.3.1Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs-next2.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.ionom7.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify-debouncer-mini0.7.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.51Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap2.34.0Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4.14Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.3.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioeither1.6.1Cargo.toml
crates.iowhich4.2.2Cargo.toml
crates.iopath-absolutize3.0.11Cargo.toml
All dependencies 157

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103direct
crates.ioclap2.34.0direct
crates.iodirs-next2.0.0direct
crates.ioeither1.16.0direct
crates.ioglob0.3.3direct
crates.iolog0.4.33direct
crates.ionom7.1.3direct
crates.ionotify-debouncer-mini0.7.0direct
crates.ionum_cpus1.17.0direct
crates.iopath-absolutize3.1.1direct
crates.iopathdiff0.2.3direct
crates.iopubgrub0.2.1direct
crates.iopubgrub-dependency-provider-elm0.1.0direct
crates.ioregex1.13.0direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150direct
crates.ioureq2.12.1direct
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0direct
crates.iowhich4.4.2direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioassert_cmd2.2.2indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iobstr1.12.3indirect
crates.iocc1.2.67indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.iodifflib0.4.0indirect
crates.iodirs-sys-next0.1.2indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.6indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.ioflate21.1.9indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.2indirect
crates.iofs_extra1.3.0indirect
crates.iofsevent-sys4.1.0indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.iohome0.5.12indirect
crates.ioicu_collections2.2.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locale_core2.2.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer2.2.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer_data2.2.0indirect
crates.ioicu_properties2.2.0indirect
crates.ioicu_properties_data2.2.0indirect
crates.ioicu_provider2.2.0indirect
crates.ioidna1.1.0indirect
crates.ioidna_adapter1.2.2indirect
crates.ioinotify0.11.4indirect
crates.ioinotify-sys0.1.8indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iokqueue1.2.0indirect
crates.iokqueue-sys1.1.2indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibredox0.1.18indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.4.15indirect
crates.iolitemap0.8.2indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.iomio1.2.2indirect
crates.ionotify8.2.0indirect
crates.ionotify-types2.1.0indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopath-dedot3.1.1indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2indirect
crates.iopotential_utf0.1.5indirect
crates.iopredicates3.1.4indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.10indirect
crates.iopredicates-tree1.0.13indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioredox_users0.4.6indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.15indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioring0.17.14indirect
crates.iorustc-hash1.1.0indirect
crates.iorustix0.38.44indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustls0.23.42indirect
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.15.0indirect
crates.iorustls-webpki0.103.13indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.9indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iosynstructure0.13.2indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermtree0.5.1indirect
crates.iotextwrap0.11.0indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iotinystr0.8.3indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.1.14indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.iourl2.5.8indirect
crates.ioutf8_iter1.0.4indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots0.26.11indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots1.0.8indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.53.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowriteable0.6.3indirect
crates.ioyoke0.8.3indirect
crates.ioyoke-derive0.8.2indirect
crates.iozerofrom0.1.8indirect
crates.iozerofrom-derive0.1.7indirect
crates.iozeroize1.9.0indirect
crates.iozerotrie0.2.4indirect
crates.iozerovec0.11.6indirect
crates.iozerovec-derive0.11.3indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
npm@mattpiz/elm-test-rs-darwin-arm643.2.0-0indirect
npm@mattpiz/elm-test-rs-darwin-x643.2.0-0indirect
npm@mattpiz/elm-test-rs-linux-arm3.2.0-0indirect
npm@mattpiz/elm-test-rs-linux-arm643.2.0-0indirect
npm@mattpiz/elm-test-rs-linux-x643.2.0-0indirect
npm@mattpiz/elm-test-rs-win32-x643.2.0-0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:elm-test-rs@3.2.0-0 pulls in 6 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.