Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 09:50 UTC

mrousavy / nitro

🔥 Insanely fast native C++, Swift or Kotlin modules with a statically compiled binding layer to JSI

C++ · TypeScript · SwiftMIT★ 1,883 stars⑂ 103 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

mrousavy/nitro holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Marc RousavyPersonal account
5,249 followers177 public repossince Oct 2015CEO at @margelo

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume542 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year542
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~11.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.36.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases11.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.1/60Stars1,883 stars
16.7/25Forks103 forks
6.7/15Watchers17 watchers
Inputs used
forks103
stars1,883
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth41 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled41
top_contributor_share0.888
How it's scored
36.2/42Issue resolution86% of issues closed
20.3/30PR acceptance749/1,108 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 9/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs749
open_issues30
closed_issues186
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.861
closed_unmerged_prs359
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach5,249 followers of mrousavy
25/25Track record177 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,249
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmrousavy
public_repos177
account_age_days3,924
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://nitro.margelo.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics16 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscpp, jsi, kotlin, library, modules, native, react, react-native, swift, templates, nitro, turbomodules, nitro-modules, hybrid-object, fast, hybrid
has_wikino
homepagehttps://nitro.margelo.com
docs_sitehttps://nitro.margelo.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 9/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities95 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingconfig/tsconfig.json, docs/tsconfig.json, example/tsconfig.json, packages/nitrogen/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-nitro-modules/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-nitro-test-external/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-nitro-test/tsconfig.json, packages/template/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsconfig/tsconfig.json, docs/tsconfig.json, example/tsconfig.json, packages/nitrogen/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-nitro-modules/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-nitro-test-external/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native-nitro-test/tsconfig.json, packages/template/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC++ (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/356 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes76,408
source_files_sampled356
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,883GitHub stars
41contributors
542commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
30open issues
npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 09:49 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests15 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities95 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 34
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@docusaurus/core3.10.1docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/faster3.10.1docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/plugin-sitemap3.10.1docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/plugin-vercel-analytics3.10.1docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic3.10.1docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-mermaid3.10.1docs/package.json
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.1docs/package.json
npmcheerio^1.2.0docs/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1docs/package.json
npmesbuild-register^3.6.0docs/package.json
npmprism-react-renderer^2.4.1docs/package.json
npmreact19.2.3docs/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.3docs/package.json
npmsatori^0.26.0docs/package.json
npmsharp^0.35.2docs/package.json
RubyGemscocoapods~> 1.16example/Gemfile
RubyGemsactivesupport>= 6.1.7.5example/Gemfile
RubyGemsxcodeproj>= 1.27.0example/Gemfile
RubyGemsbigdecimalexample/Gemfile
RubyGemsloggerexample/Gemfile
RubyGemsbenchmarkexample/Gemfile
RubyGemsmutex_mexample/Gemfile
RubyGemsnkfexample/Gemfile
npm@react-native-segmented-control/segmented-control^2.5.7example/package.json
npm@react-navigation/bottom-tabs^7.16.2example/package.json
npm@react-navigation/native^7.2.5example/package.json
npmdeep-equal^2.2.3example/package.json
npmreact19.2.3example/package.json
npmreact-native0.85.3example/package.json
npmreact-native-nitro-test*example/package.json
npmreact-native-nitro-test-external*example/package.json
npmreact-native-nitro-modules*example/package.json
npmreact-native-safe-area-context^5.8.0example/package.json
npmreact-native-screens^4.25.2example/package.json
All dependencies 121

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 87 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@docusaurus/core3.10.1direct
npm@docusaurus/faster3.10.1direct
npm@docusaurus/plugin-sitemap3.10.1direct
npm@docusaurus/plugin-vercel-analytics3.10.1direct
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic3.10.1direct
npm@docusaurus/theme-mermaid3.10.1direct
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.1direct
npm@react-native-segmented-control/segmented-control^2.5.7direct
npm@react-navigation/bottom-tabs^7.16.2direct
npm@react-navigation/native^7.2.5direct
npmcheerio^1.2.0direct
npmclsx^2.1.1direct
npmdeep-equal^2.2.3direct
npmesbuild-register^3.6.0direct
npmprism-react-renderer^2.4.1direct
npmreact19.2.3direct
npmreact-dom19.2.3direct
npmreact-native0.85.3direct
npmreact-native-nitro-modules*direct
npmreact-native-nitro-modules^0.35.9direct
npmreact-native-nitro-test*direct
npmreact-native-nitro-test-external*direct
npmreact-native-safe-area-context^5.8.0direct
npmreact-native-screens^4.25.2direct
npmsatori^0.26.0direct
npmsharp^0.35.2direct
RubyGemsactivesupport7.1.6direct
RubyGemsbenchmark0.4.1direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.2.2direct
RubyGemscocoapods1.16.2direct
RubyGemslogger1.7.0direct
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0direct
RubyGemsnkf0.2.0direct
RubyGemsxcodeproj1.27.0direct
npm@babel/core^7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/runtime^7.29.7indirect
npm@docusaurus/module-type-aliases3.10.1indirect
npm@docusaurus/tsconfig3.10.1indirect
npm@docusaurus/types3.10.1indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc^3.3.5indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.39.4indirect
npm@jamesacarr/eslint-formatter-github-actions^0.2.0indirect
npm@react-native-community/cli20.1.3indirect
npm@react-native-community/cli-platform-android20.1.3indirect
npm@react-native-community/cli-platform-ios20.1.3indirect
npm@react-native-harness/platform-android1.3.0indirect
npm@react-native-harness/platform-apple1.3.0indirect
npm@react-native/babel-preset0.85.3indirect
npm@react-native/eslint-config0.85.3indirect
npm@react-native/jest-preset0.85.3indirect
npm@react-native/metro-config0.85.3indirect
npm@react-native/typescript-config0.85.3indirect
npm@release-it-plugins/workspaces^5.0.3indirect
npm@release-it/bumper^7.0.5indirect
npm@release-it/conventional-changelog^10.0.6indirect
npm@tsconfig/react-native^3.0.9indirect
npm@types/deep-equal^1.0.4indirect
npm@types/jest*indirect
npm@types/jest^29.5.12indirect
npm@types/jest^29.5.14indirect
npm@types/node^26.0.0indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.15indirect
npmbabel-plugin-module-resolver^5.0.3indirect
npmchalk^5.3.0indirect
npmdocusaurus-plugin-llms^0.4.0indirect
npmeslint^9.39.4indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^10.1.8indirect
npmeslint-plugin-ft-flow^3.0.11indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier^5.5.5indirect
npmjest*indirect
npmjest^29.7.0indirect
npmnitrogen*indirect
npmprettier^3.8.3indirect
npmreact-native-builder-bob^0.41.0indirect
npmreact-native-harness1.3.0indirect
npmreact-native-worklets^0.9.1indirect
npmrelease-it^19.2.4indirect
npmts-morph^28.0.0indirect
npmtypescript^6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript~6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.60.0indirect
npmyargs^18.0.0indirect
npmzod^4.4.3indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsalgoliasearch1.27.5indirect
RubyGemsatomos0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsCFPropertyList3.0.8indirect
RubyGemsclaide1.1.0indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-core1.16.2indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-deintegrate1.0.5indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-downloader2.1indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-plugins1.0.0indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-search1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-trunk1.6.0indirect
RubyGemscocoapods-try1.2.0indirect
RubyGemscolored23.1.2indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.6indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool2.5.5indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsescape0.0.4indirect
RubyGemsethon0.18.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsfourflusher2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsfuzzy_match2.0.4indirect
RubyGemsgh_inspector1.1.3indirect
RubyGemshttpclient2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.6indirect
RubyGemsjson2.19.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.25.1indirect
RubyGemsmolinillo0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsnanaimo0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnap1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsnetrc0.11.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix4.0.7indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsruby-macho2.5.1indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.3.2indirect
RubyGemstyphoeus1.6.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.