Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 00:29 UTC

nanostores / persistent

Smart store for Nano Stores state manager to keep data in localStorage

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 382 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Jul 2021View on GitHub ↗

nanostores/persistent holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Nano StoresOrganization

243 followers19 public repossince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@nanostores/persistent	1.3.5	434,029	35	55 days ago	cross-tab localstorage nano persistent preact react store svelte vue

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

59Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 16 days ago
6.2/36	Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
16.6/18	Commit volume — 70 commits in the last year
7/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

commits_last_year	70
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	16
active_weeks_last_year	9

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 55 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~51.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	13
latest_release_tag	1.3.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	55
mean_days_between_releases	51.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate

How it's scored

41.9/60	Stars — 382 stars
11.5/25	Forks — 25 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	25
stars	382
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

94Exceptional

How it's scored

75.2/80	Monthly downloads — 434,029 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@nanostores/persistent
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	434,029
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	17
top_contributor_share	0.733

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good

How it's scored

35.9/42	Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
28.1/30	PR acceptance — 29/31 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	29
open_issues	6
closed_issues	35
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.854
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
17.2/25	Owner reach — 243 followers of nanostores
20.1/25	Track record — 19 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	243
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	nanostores
public_repos	19
account_age_days	1,932

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 55 days ago
20/20	Version history — 35 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@nanostores/persistent
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	55

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 contributor organization profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
5.2/7.5	Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.2
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	75
security_posture_after_multiplier	39
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	52

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	182
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 182 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

5Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.3/40	Legible commit history — 10 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/15 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	8,027
source_files_sampled	15
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

382GitHub stars

17contributors

70commits, last 12 months

16days since last push

13releases

1bus factor

6open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿

0Stars

25Forks

12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 4Patch 7

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 00:29 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
7	Maintained	9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 182

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 182 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@logux/actions	`0.5.0`	indirect
npm	@logux/core	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	@logux/oxc-configs	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@logux/server	`0.14.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.139.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-x64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@profoundlogic/hogan	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/esbuild	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/file	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/preset-small-lib	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.1`	indirect
npm	@types/trusted-types	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	@types/whatwg-mimetype	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/ws	`8.18.1`	indirect
npm	abbrev	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	actions-up	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-colors	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	better-node-test	`0.8.4`	indirect
npm	buffer-image-size	`0.6.4`	indirect
npm	bytes-iec	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	check-dts	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	cookie	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	diff	`8.0.4`	indirect
npm	diff2html	`3.4.56`	indirect
npm	dompurify	`3.4.12`	indirect
npm	enquirer	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prefer-let	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-tsconfig	`4.14.0`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.7.0`	indirect
npm	happy-dom	`20.11.0`	indirect
npm	highlight.js	`11.11.1`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	marked	`18.0.6`	indirect
npm	multiocular	`0.8.4`	indirect
npm	nanodelay	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	nanoevents	`9.1.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`5.1.16`	indirect
npm	nanospinner	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	nanostores	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	nopt	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	oxlint	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	oxlint-tsgolint	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.20`	indirect
npm	requireindex	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-pkg-maps	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	size-limit	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	tsx	`4.20.6`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	url-pattern	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.1.5`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.1`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 182 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
postcss	`8.5.20`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.5.23`
dompurify	`3.4.12`	indirect	low	1	`3.4.13`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records