Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 08:29 UTC

netglue / prismic-client

PHP Api Client for Prismic.io

PHPMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 2 forkssince May 2020View on GitHub ↗

#psr-17 #psr-18 #prismic #prismicio #php #hacktoberfest

netglue/prismic-client holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Net Glue LtdOrganization · verified domain

2 followers40 public repossince Jan 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	netglue/prismic-client	1.20.0	2,740	51	241 days ago	cms prismic psr-7 psr-17 psr-18 prismicio

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 102 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	102
human_commit_share	0.21
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 51 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 241 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~48 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	51
latest_release_tag	1.20.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	241
mean_days_between_releases	48

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	8
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

49Weak

How it's scored

45.8/80	Monthly downloads — 2,740 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20	Registry dependents — 2 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	netglue/prismic-client
dependents	2
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	151,263
monthly_downloads	2,740
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.995

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good

How it's scored

31.5/42	Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 665/741 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	665
open_issues	4
closed_issues	12
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.75
closed_unmerged_prs	76
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

77Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
3.4/25	Owner reach — 2 followers of netglue
23.7/25	Track record — 40 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	netglue
public_repos	40
account_age_days	5,743

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 241 days ago
20/20	Version history — 51 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	netglue/prismic-client
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	241

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpcs.xml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	psr-17, psr-18, prismic, prismicio, php, hacktoberfest
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	96
unassessed_packages	1
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 96 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

30At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.5/40	Legible commit history — 12 of 21 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.571
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpcs.xml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 79 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.79

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/129 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	21,187
source_files_sampled	129
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example, samples

Inputs used

example_dirs	example, samples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars

2contributors

102commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

51releases

1bus factor

4open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 21Patch 8

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 08:29 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	laminas/laminas-escaper	`^2.9`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/cache	`^2.0.0 \|\| ^3.0.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-client-implementation	`*`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-client	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-message	`^1.0 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 92 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	laminas/laminas-escaper	`2.18.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/cache	`3.0.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	direct
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.7`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	boundwize/jsonrecast	`1.0.37`	indirect
Packagist	boundwize/structarmed	`0.19.4`	indirect
Packagist	clue/stream-filter	`1.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	danog/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/coding-standard	`14.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	laminas/laminas-diactoros	`3.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/cache-plugin	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/client-common	`2.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/curl-client	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/discovery	`1.20.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/httplug	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/message	`1.16.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/mock-client	`1.6.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/promise	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`12.5.8`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`6.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`8.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`12.5.40`	indirect
Packagist	psalm/plugin-phpunit	`0.19.7`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	roave/security-advisories	`—`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`4.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`7.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`8.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`7.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`8.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`6.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	slevomat/coding-standard	`8.31.1`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/array-to-xml	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/cache	`7.4.21`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/cache-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.4.21`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.4.21`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`7.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.4.21`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-exporter	`7.4.18`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`6.20.0`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`2.5.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 96 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records