Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 23:06 UTC

netresearch / t3x-nr-llm

The shared AI foundation for TYPO3 — one LLM setup for every extension on your site

PHPGPL-2.0★ 4 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

#ai #claude #llm #openai #php #typo3 #typo3-extension #anthropic #gemini #gpt #embeddings #ollama #provider-abstraction #streaming

netresearch/t3x-nr-llm holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Netresearch DTT GmbHOrganization · verified domain

43 followers286 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	netresearch/nr-llm	v0.34.0	7,082	58	9 days ago	translation extension streaming typo3 ai chatbot gemini openai llm embeddings claude ollama provider-abstraction

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36	Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 2,689 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	2,689
human_commit_share	0.9
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	37

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 58 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~2.7 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	58
latest_release_tag	v0.34.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	9
mean_days_between_releases	2.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

7.7/60	Stars — 4 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	4
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	below_threshold

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	12
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	api.securityscorecards.dev, codecov.io, github.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate

How it's scored

51.3/80	Monthly downloads — 7,082 downloads/month across packagist
5.2/20	Registry dependents — 5 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	netresearch/nr-llm
dependents	5
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	21,944
monthly_downloads	7,082
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.995

Issue & PR responsiveness

98Exceptional

How it's scored

41.5/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
28.7/30	PR acceptance — 736/769 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	736
open_issues	2
closed_issues	147
prs_merged_7d	6
prs_decided_7d	6
prs_merged_30d	49
prs_decided_30d	49
issue_closed_ratio	0.987
closed_unmerged_prs	33
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

87Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
11.8/25	Owner reach — 43 followers of netresearch
25/25	Track record — 286 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	43
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	netresearch
public_repos	286
account_age_days	6,150

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20	Version history — 58 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	netresearch/nr-llm
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 15 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, eslint.config.mjs, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://netresearch.github.io/t3x-nr-llm/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 14 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai, claude, llm, openai, php, typo3, typo3-extension, anthropic, gemini, gpt, embeddings, ollama, provider-abstraction, streaming
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://netresearch.github.io/t3x-nr-llm/
docs_site	https://netresearch.github.io/t3x-nr-llm/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

88Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

85Excellent

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.8/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Silver
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	8.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	88
unassessed_packages	14
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 88 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .ddev/GEMINI.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, .github/workflows/GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Classes/GEMINI.md, Configuration/AGENTS.md, Configuration/CLAUDE.md, Configuration/GEMINI.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, Documentation/CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Resources/GEMINI.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md, Tests/GEMINI.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://netresearch.github.io/t3x-nr-llm/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 90 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://netresearch.github.io/t3x-nr-llm/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	.ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .ddev/GEMINI.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, .github/workflows/GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Classes/GEMINI.md, Configuration/AGENTS.md, Configuration/CLAUDE.md, Configuration/GEMINI.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, Documentation/CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Resources/GEMINI.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md, Tests/GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	11,484

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, eslint.config.mjs, phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.1/55	Manageable file sizes — 25/1,536 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	208,619
source_files_sampled	1,536
oversized_source_files	25

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars

3contributors

2,689commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

58releases

1bus factor

2open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Star history carried forward from 2026-07-10: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 4 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 4 ★ / 2 ⇿

4Stars

2Forks

47Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-10. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

Major 0Minor 25Patch 22

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.5 / 10

8.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 23:05 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
7	CII-Best-Practices	badge detected: Silver
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	netresearch/nr-vault	`^0.16.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-client	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/log	`^2.0 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`^13.4 \|\| ^14.3`	composer.json

All dependencies 102

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 95 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	netresearch/nr-vault	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-client	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`—`	direct
npm	@axe-core/playwright	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@cacheable/memory	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	@cacheable/utils	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.10.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@keyv/bigmap	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	@keyv/serialize	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@playwright/test	`1.63.0`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.13.3`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	axe-core	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.9`	indirect
npm	cacheable	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.10.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-no-unsanitized	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`11.1.5`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`6.1.23`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.4`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.12.0`	indirect
npm	hashery	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	hookified	`1.15.1`	indirect
npm	hookified	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`5.6.0`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	playwright	`1.63.0`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.63.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	qified	`0.10.1`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.18.2`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	fakerphp/faker	`—`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/typo3-ci-workflows	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	tpwd/ke_search	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-dashboard	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-indexed-search	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-install	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sentence-transformers	`6.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	torch	`2.14.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 88 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records