Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 00:56 UTC

netresearch / t3x-nr-vault

Secure secrets management for TYPO3 with envelope encryption, access control, and audit logging

PHPGPL-2.0★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#typo3-extension

netresearch/t3x-nr-vault holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Netresearch DTT GmbHOrganization
40 followers278 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnetresearch/nr-vaultv0.10.113,8132012 days agosecurityoauthencryptiontypo3credentialssecretsvaultlibsodiumapi-keysaudit-logkey-rotationsecrets-managementenvelope-encryption

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 918 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year918
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 20 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~14.4 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv0.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases14.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate
How it's scored
55.2/80Monthly downloads — 13,813 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnetresearch/nr-vault
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads35,437
monthly_downloads13,813
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.813

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
28/42Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance — 184/194 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs184
open_issues2
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.667
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
11.6/25Owner reach — 40 followers of netresearch
25/25Track record — 278 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers40
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginnetresearch
public_repos278
account_age_days6,091
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnetresearch/nr-vault
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstypo3-extension
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

83Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.8/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Silver
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate8.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .ddev/GEMINI.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, .github/workflows/GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Classes/GEMINI.md, Configuration/AGENTS.md, Configuration/CLAUDE.md, Configuration/GEMINI.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Resources/GEMINI.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md, Tests/E2E/AGENTS.md, Tests/E2E/CLAUDE.md, Tests/E2E/GEMINI.md, Tests/GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .ddev/GEMINI.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, .github/workflows/GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Classes/GEMINI.md, Configuration/AGENTS.md, Configuration/CLAUDE.md, Configuration/GEMINI.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Resources/GEMINI.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md, Tests/E2E/AGENTS.md, Tests/E2E/CLAUDE.md, Tests/E2E/GEMINI.md, Tests/GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,308
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 2/330 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes90,661
source_files_sampled330
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

2GitHub stars
4contributors
918commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10
8.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 00:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
7CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Silver
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^13.4 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend^13.4 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-install^13.4 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-client^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-factory^1.0composer.json
All dependencies 14

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistpsr/http-client—direct
Packagistpsr/http-factory—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-install—direct
npm@axe-core/playwright^4.10.0indirect
npm@playwright/test^1.57.0indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-sodium—indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream—indirect
Packagistnetresearch/typo3-ci-workflows—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistroave/security-advisories—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-scheduler—indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with netresearch/t3x-nr-vault. Read them side by side →

93mongodb/kingfisherDetect leaked secrets + live validation. Map blast radius across your stack. Revoke fast. 1,000+ rules.Exceptional99trufflesecurity/trufflehogFind, verify, and analyze leaked credentialsExceptional95GitGuardian/ggshieldDetect and validate 500+ types of hardcoded secrets with advanced checks. Use it as a pre-commit hook, GitHub Action, or CLI for proactive secret detection and security.Exceptional90Keeper-Security/secrets-managerKeeper Secrets Manager is a cloud-based, zero-knowledge platform for securing infrastructure secrets. Provides automatic password rotation and integration into popular DevOps CI/CD tools.Excellent96netresearch/t3x-rte_ckeditor_imageImage support in CKEditor for the TYPO3 ecosystem - by NetresearchExceptional94nextcloud/end_to_end_encryption:closed_lock_with_key: Server API to support End-to-End EncryptionExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.