Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 15:43 UTC

neuron-core / neuron-ai

The Agentic Framework of the PHP ecosystem to build production-ready AI driven applications. Connect components (LLMs, Tools, vector DBs, memory) to agents that interact with your data and UI.

PHPMIT★ 2,091 stars⑂ 243 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

neuron-core/neuron-ai holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NeuronOrganization
88 followers17 public repossince Sep 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistneuron-core/neuron-ai3.16.10182,7374514 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,609 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,609
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.16.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.9/60Stars — 2,091 stars
19.9/25Forks — 243 forks
8.4/15Watchers — 34 watchers
Inputs used
forks243
stars2,091
watchers34
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
70.2/80Monthly downloads — 182,737 downloads/month across packagist
10.1/20Registry dependents — 32 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesneuron-core/neuron-ai
dependents32
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,064,211
monthly_downloads182,737
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 62 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled62
top_contributor_share0.889
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
22.7/30PR acceptance — 181/239 decided PRs merged
9.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs181
open_issues3
closed_issues258
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.989
closed_unmerged_prs58
first_time_authors_30d4
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14/25Owner reach — 88 followers of neuron-core
11.2/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers88
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginneuron-core
public_repos17
account_age_days370

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 451 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesneuron-core/neuron-ai
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.neuron-ai.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagentic-ai, agentic-framework, ai, llm, llm-inference, llms, vector-database, php, agent, agents
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.neuron-ai.dev
docs_sitehttps://docs.neuron-ai.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, src/Agent/AGENTS.md, src/Agent/CLAUDE.md, src/Chat/AGENTS.md, src/Chat/CLAUDE.md, src/Console/AGENTS.md, src/Console/CLAUDE.md, src/Evaluation/AGENTS.md, src/Evaluation/CLAUDE.md, src/HttpClient/AGENTS.md, src/HttpClient/CLAUDE.md, src/MCP/AGENTS.md, src/MCP/CLAUDE.md, src/Observability/AGENTS.md, src/Observability/CLAUDE.md, src/Providers/AGENTS.md, src/Providers/CLAUDE.md, src/RAG/AGENTS.md, src/RAG/CLAUDE.md, src/StructuredOutput/AGENTS.md, src/StructuredOutput/CLAUDE.md, src/Testing/AGENTS.md, src/Testing/CLAUDE.md, src/Tools/AGENTS.md, src/Tools/CLAUDE.md, src/Workflow/AGENTS.md, src/Workflow/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.neuron-ai.dev/llms.txt)
19.2/40Legible commit history — 36 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.neuron-ai.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.36
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, src/Agent/AGENTS.md, src/Agent/CLAUDE.md, src/Chat/AGENTS.md, src/Chat/CLAUDE.md, src/Console/AGENTS.md, src/Console/CLAUDE.md, src/Evaluation/AGENTS.md, src/Evaluation/CLAUDE.md, src/HttpClient/AGENTS.md, src/HttpClient/CLAUDE.md, src/MCP/AGENTS.md, src/MCP/CLAUDE.md, src/Observability/AGENTS.md, src/Observability/CLAUDE.md, src/Providers/AGENTS.md, src/Providers/CLAUDE.md, src/RAG/AGENTS.md, src/RAG/CLAUDE.md, src/StructuredOutput/AGENTS.md, src/StructuredOutput/CLAUDE.md, src/Testing/AGENTS.md, src/Testing/CLAUDE.md, src/Tools/AGENTS.md, src/Tools/CLAUDE.md, src/Workflow/AGENTS.md, src/Workflow/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,746
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/708 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes29,369
source_files_sampled708
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,091GitHub stars
62contributors
1,609commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 243 ⇿
0Stars
243Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025024252025-032025-122026-09
Major 0Minor 7Patch 93

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 15:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistinspector-apm/inspector-php^3.18composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message^1.0|^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle—direct
Packagistinspector-apm/inspector-php—direct
Packagistpsr/http-message—direct
Packagistamphp/amp—indirect
Packagistamphp/http-client—indirect
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php—indirect
Packagistelasticsearch/elasticsearch—indirect
Packagistext-pdo—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistgoogle/auth—indirect
Packagisthtml2text/html2text—indirect
Packagistilluminate/database—indirect
Packagistlaudis/neo4j-php-client—indirect
Packagistopensearch-project/opensearch-php—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistrector/rector—indirect
Packagistspatie/fork—indirect
Packagisttomasvotruba/type-coverage—indirect
Packagisttypesense/typesense-php—indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.