Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 23:32 UTC

nextjournal / markdown

A cross-platform Clojure/Script parser for Markdown

ClojureISC★ 97 stars⑂ 11 forkssince Apr 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

nextjournal/markdown holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (28/100). It was last updated 107 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nextjournalOrganization
110 followers189 public repossince Apr 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 107 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume38 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push107
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases25 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recencylatest release 107 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~32.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.7.225
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release107
mean_days_between_releases32.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.2/60Stars97 stars
8.3/25Forks11 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks11
stars97
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (ISC)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 56% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.564
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution88% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance41/48 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs41
open_issues2
closed_issues15
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.882
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
14.7/25Owner reach110 followers of nextjournal
25/25Track record189 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers110
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnextjournal
public_repos189
account_age_days3,739
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsclojure, clojurescript, markdown
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

29At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

28At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeClojure without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageClojure
largest_source_bytes12,450
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

97GitHub stars
7contributors
38commits, last 12 months
107days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 23:32 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@codemirror/autocomplete^6.0.2package.json
npm@codemirror/commands^6.0.0package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-markdown6.0.0package.json
npm@codemirror/language^6.1.0package.json
npm@codemirror/lint^6.0.0package.json
npm@codemirror/search^6.0.0package.json
npm@codemirror/state^6.0.1package.json
npm@codemirror/view^6.0.2package.json
npm@lezer/common^1.0.0package.json
npm@lezer/generator^1.0.0package.json
npm@lezer/highlight^1.0.0package.json
npm@lezer/lr^1.0.0package.json
npm@lezer/markdown^1.0.0package.json
npm@nextjournal/lang-clojure1.0.0package.json
npm@nextjournal/lezer-clojure1.0.0package.json
npmd3-require^1.2.4package.json
npmemoji-regex^10.0.0package.json
npmframer-motion^6.2.8package.json
npmlezer-clojure1.0.0-rc.0package.json
npmmarkdown-it^14.1.0package.json
npmmarkdown-it-block-image^0.0.3package.json
npmmarkdown-it-footnote^3.0.3package.json
npmmarkdown-it-texmath^1.0.0package.json
npmmarkdown-it-toc-done-right^4.2.0package.json
npmpunycode2.1.1package.json
npmreact^18.2.0package.json
npmreact-dom^18.2.0package.json
npmuse-sync-external-store1.2.0package.json
npmvh-sticky-table-header1.2.1package.json
npmw3c-keyname^2.2.4package.json
All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 32 direct and 110 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@codemirror/autocomplete6.0.2direct
npm@codemirror/commands6.0.1direct
npm@codemirror/lang-markdown6.0.0direct
npm@codemirror/language6.2.0direct
npm@codemirror/lint6.0.0direct
npm@codemirror/search6.0.0direct
npm@codemirror/state6.1.0direct
npm@codemirror/view6.0.2direct
npm@lezer/common1.0.0direct
npm@lezer/generator1.1.0direct
npm@lezer/highlight1.0.0direct
npm@lezer/lr1.1.0direct
npm@lezer/markdown1.0.1direct
npm@nextjournal/lang-clojure1.0.0direct
npm@nextjournal/lezer-clojure1.0.0direct
npmd3-require1.3.0direct
npmemoji-regex10.1.0direct
npmframer-motion6.3.11direct
npmlezer-clojure1.0.0-rc.0direct
npmmarkdown-it14.1.0direct
npmmarkdown-it-block-image0.0.3direct
npmmarkdown-it-footnote3.0.3direct
npmmarkdown-it-texmath1.0.0direct
npmmarkdown-it-toc-done-right4.2.0direct
npmpunycode1.3.2direct
npmpunycode1.4.1direct
npmpunycode2.1.1direct
npmreact18.2.0direct
npmreact-dom18.2.0direct
npmuse-sync-external-store1.2.0direct
npmvh-sticky-table-header1.2.1direct
npmw3c-keyname2.2.4direct
npm@codemirror/lang-css6.0.0indirect
npm@codemirror/lang-html6.1.0indirect
npm@codemirror/lang-javascript6.0.1indirect
npm@emotion/is-prop-valid0.8.8indirect
npm@emotion/memoize0.7.4indirect
npm@lezer/css1.0.0indirect
npm@lezer/html1.0.0indirect
npm@lezer/javascript1.0.1indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmasn1.js5.4.1indirect
npmassert1.5.0indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbn.js4.12.0indirect
npmbn.js5.2.1indirect
npmbrorand1.1.0indirect
npmbrowserify-aes1.2.0indirect
npmbrowserify-cipher1.0.1indirect
npmbrowserify-des1.0.2indirect
npmbrowserify-rsa4.1.0indirect
npmbrowserify-sign4.2.1indirect
npmbrowserify-zlib0.2.0indirect
npmbuffer4.9.2indirect
npmbuffer-xor1.0.3indirect
npmbuiltin-status-codes3.0.0indirect
npmcipher-base1.0.4indirect
npmconsole-browserify1.2.0indirect
npmconstants-browserify1.0.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmcreate-ecdh4.0.4indirect
npmcreate-hash1.2.0indirect
npmcreate-hmac1.1.7indirect
npmcrelt1.0.5indirect
npmcrypto-browserify3.12.0indirect
npmdes.js1.0.1indirect
npmdiffie-hellman5.0.3indirect
npmdomain-browser1.2.0indirect
npmelliptic6.5.4indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmesbuild0.12.29indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmevp_bytestokey1.0.3indirect
npmframesync6.0.1indirect
npmhash-base3.1.0indirect
npmhash.js1.1.7indirect
npmhey-listen1.0.8indirect
npmhmac-drbg1.0.1indirect
npmhttps-browserify1.0.0indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.1indirect
npminherits2.0.3indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.0indirect
npmloose-envify1.4.0indirect
npmmd5.js1.3.5indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmmiller-rabin4.0.1indirect
npmminimalistic-assert1.0.1indirect
npmminimalistic-crypto-utils1.0.1indirect
npmnode-libs-browser2.2.1indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmos-browserify0.3.0indirect
npmpako1.0.11indirect
npmparse-asn15.1.6indirect
npmpath-browserify0.0.1indirect
npmpbkdf23.1.2indirect
npmpopmotion11.0.3indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmpublic-encrypt4.0.3indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmquerystring0.2.0indirect
npmquerystring-es30.2.1indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmrandomfill1.0.4indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.7indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.0indirect
npmreadline-sync1.4.10indirect
npmripemd1602.0.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmscheduler0.23.0indirect
npmsetimmediate1.0.5indirect
npmsha.js2.4.11indirect
npmshadow-cljs2.19.3indirect
npmshadow-cljs-jar1.3.2indirect
npmsource-map0.5.7indirect
npmsource-map-support0.4.18indirect
npmstream-browserify2.0.2indirect
npmstream-http2.8.3indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstyle-mod4.0.0indirect
npmstyle-value-types5.0.0indirect
npmtimers-browserify2.0.12indirect
npmto-arraybuffer1.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.4.0indirect
npmtty-browserify0.0.0indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmurl0.11.0indirect
npmutil0.10.3indirect
npmutil0.11.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvm-browserify1.1.2indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmws7.5.8indirect
npmxtend4.0.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.