Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-19 15:35 UTC

ninemoreminutes / django-crum

Django CRUM (Current Request User Middleware) captures the current request and user in thread local storage.

PythonCustom license★ 102 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Oct 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#django#django-middleware

ninemoreminutes/django-crum holds a health index of 23 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (70/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 909 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

23
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

23
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nine More Minutes, Inc.Organization
1 follower25 public repossince Feb 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdjango-crum0.7.9-142107 days agodjangorequestusermiddlewarethreadlocal

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 909 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push909
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

32At Risk
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 10 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,107 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~179.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tag0.7.9
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,107
mean_days_between_releases179.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

45Weak
How it's scored
32.5/60Stars — 102 stars
9.6/25Forks — 15 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars102
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

24At Risk
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — 0/20 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues5
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of ninemoreminutes
22.3/25Track record — 25 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginninemoreminutes
public_repos25
account_age_days5,674
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 2,107 days ago
20/20Version history — 14 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdjango-crum
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2,107

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://django-crum.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdjango, django-middleware
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://django-crum.readthedocs.io/
docs_sitehttp://django-crum.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:django-crum@0.7.9 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.6/40Legible commit history — 22 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.367
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — tox.ini
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 60
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes8,015
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

102GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
909days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
5open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿
0Stars
15Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151522014-122020-022025-05
Major 0Minor 1Patch 9

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-19 15:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdjango>=1.8setup.cfg
All dependencies 101

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 99 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdjango2.2.20direct
PyPIdjango3.2direct
PyPIalabaster0.7.12indirect
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.2indirect
PyPIasgiref3.3.4indirect
PyPIattrs20.3.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.9.0indirect
PyPIbackcall0.2.0indirect
PyPIbleach3.3.0indirect
PyPIbump2version1.0.1indirect
PyPIbumpversion0.6.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2020.12.5indirect
PyPIchardet4.0.0indirect
PyPIclick7.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.4indirect
PyPIcoverage5.5indirect
PyPIdecorator5.0.5indirect
PyPIdistlib0.3.1indirect
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar3.1.1indirect
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar3.2indirect
PyPIdjango-extensions3.1.0indirect
PyPIdjango-extensions3.1.2indirect
PyPIdjangorestframework3.12.4indirect
PyPIdocutils0.17indirect
PyPIfilelock3.0.12indirect
PyPIflake83.9.0indirect
PyPIidna2.10indirect
PyPIimagesize1.2.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata2.1.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata3.10.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources3.2.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources5.1.2indirect
PyPIiniconfig1.1.1indirect
PyPIipython7.16.1indirect
PyPIipython7.22.0indirect
PyPIipython7.9.0indirect
PyPIipython-genutils0.2.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.17.2indirect
PyPIjedi0.18.0indirect
PyPIjinja22.11.3indirect
PyPIkeyring23.0.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe1.1.1indirect
PyPImccabe0.6.1indirect
PyPIpackaging20.9indirect
PyPIparso0.7.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.2indirect
PyPIpathlib22.3.5indirect
PyPIpep5170.10.0indirect
PyPIpexpect4.8.0indirect
PyPIpickleshare0.7.5indirect
PyPIpip-tools5.5.0indirect
PyPIpip-tools6.0.1indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.7.0indirect
PyPIpluggy0.13.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit2.0.10indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.18indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpy1.10.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.7.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes2.3.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.8.1indirect
PyPIpyparsing2.4.7indirect
PyPIpytest6.1.2indirect
PyPIpytest6.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov2.11.1indirect
PyPIpytest-django4.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-flake81.0.7indirect
PyPIpytest-runner5.2indirect
PyPIpytest-runner5.3.0indirect
PyPIpytz2021.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer29.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.25.1indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt0.9.1indirect
PyPIrfc39861.4.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools-twine0.1.3indirect
PyPIsix1.15.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx3.5.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp1.0.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp1.0.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp1.0.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp1.0.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml1.1.4indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.4.1indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItox3.23.0indirect
PyPItox-gh-actions2.4.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.60.0indirect
PyPItraitlets4.3.3indirect
PyPItraitlets5.0.5indirect
PyPItwine1.15.0indirect
PyPItwine3.4.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions3.7.4.3indirect
PyPIurllib31.26.4indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.4.3indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.5indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIzipp1.2.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.4.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:django-crum@0.7.9 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ninemoreminutes/django-crum. Read them side by side →

92marshmallow-code/webargsA friendly library for parsing HTTP request arguments, with built-in support for popular web frameworks, including Flask, Django, Bottle, Tornado, Pyramid, webapp2, Falcon, and aiohttp.Excellent87adamchainz/django-cors-headersDjango app for handling the server headers required for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)Excellent99aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-pythonA developer toolkit to implement Serverless best practices and increase developer velocity.Exceptional99wagtail/wagtailA Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experienceExceptional98django/djangoThe Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.Exceptional98netbox-community/netboxThe premier source of truth powering network automation. Open source under Apache 2. Try NetBox Cloud free: https://netboxlabs.com/products/free-netbox-cloud/Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.