Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 15:53 UTC

nucleos / NucleosUserBundle

👤 Lightweight user management for symfony.

PHPMIT★ 61 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

nucleos/NucleosUserBundle holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NucleosOrganization
8 followers30 public repossince Dec 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnucleos/user-bundle4.1.07,2834596 days agosymfonyuser-management

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume21 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases45 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 96 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~84.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tag4.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release96
mean_days_between_releases84.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/60Stars61 stars
10.3/25Forks18 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars61
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
51.5/80Monthly downloads7,283 downloads/month across packagist
5.6/20Registry dependents6 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnucleos/user-bundle
dependents6
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads408,160
monthly_downloads7,283
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth18 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.343
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
24.6/30PR acceptance612/747 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs612
open_issues5
closed_issues50
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs135
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
6.9/25Owner reach8 followers of nucleos
22.9/25Track record30 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnucleos
public_repos30
account_age_days2,400
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 96 days ago
20/20Version history45 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnucleos/user-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish96

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.nucleos.rocks/projects/user-bundle/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssymfony, symfony-bundle, bundle, user, management, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.nucleos.rocks/projects/user-bundle/
docs_sitehttps://docs.nucleos.rocks/projects/user-bundle/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/129 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes17,720
source_files_sampled129
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

61GitHub stars
18contributors
21commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
45releases
2bus factor
5open issues
Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 15:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 3/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/collections^1.8 || ^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/common^3.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/event-manager^1.2 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/persistence^4.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts^2.5 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/form^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mailer^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mime^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/password-hasher^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring^1.13composer.json
Packagistsymfony/routing^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-bundle^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-core^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-csrf^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-http^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/translation^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts^2.5 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/twig-bridge^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/validator^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagisttwig/twig^2.14 || ^3.1composer.json
All dependencies 55

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 29 direct and 26 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/collectionsdirect
Packagistdoctrine/commondirect
Packagistdoctrine/event-managerdirect
Packagistdoctrine/persistencedirect
Packagistsymfony/configdirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectiondirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherdirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/formdirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundledirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundationdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kerneldirect
Packagistsymfony/mailerdirect
Packagistsymfony/mimedirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolverdirect
Packagistsymfony/password-hasherdirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstringdirect
Packagistsymfony/routingdirect
Packagistsymfony/security-bundledirect
Packagistsymfony/security-coredirect
Packagistsymfony/security-csrfdirect
Packagistsymfony/security-httpdirect
Packagistsymfony/translationdirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bridgedirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundledirect
Packagistsymfony/validatordirect
Packagisttwig/twigdirect
Packagistdama/doctrine-test-bundleindirect
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundleindirect
Packagistdoctrine/ormindirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalizeindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistext-mbstringindirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistmaglnet/composer-require-checkerindirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-testindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmdindirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installerindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-doctrineindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunitindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rulesindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfonyindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kitindirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selectorindirect
Packagistsymfony/doctrine-bridgeindirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridgeindirect
Packagistsymfony/yamlindirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.