Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 23:14 UTC

numerique-gouv / content-manager

Gestionnaire de contenu permettant de créer et gérer un site internet basé sur le Système de design de l'État, accessible et sécurisé. Basé sur Wagtail CMS

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 65 stars⑂ 70 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#cms#django#dsfr#gouvernement#wagtail#hacktoberfest

numerique-gouv/content-manager holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

numerique.gouvOrganization
255 followers57 public repossince Sep 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdemopoints to another repo — not scored0.1.0-15574 days agotestegg
PyPIsites-conformes4.0.2-174 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence — 41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 288 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year288
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year41

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 51 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~17.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count51
latest_release_tagv4.1-rc1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases17.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak
How it's scored
29.3/60Stars — 65 stars
15.3/25Forks — 70 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks70
stars65
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 69% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.689

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate
How it's scored
30.4/42Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
22.5/30PR acceptance — 310/413 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs310
open_issues35
closed_issues92
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.724
closed_unmerged_prs103
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
17.3/25Owner reach — 255 followers of numerique-gouv
24.8/25Track record — 57 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers255
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginnumerique-gouv
public_repos57
account_age_days2,852
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessites-conformes
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://sites.beta.gouv.fr/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscms, django, dsfr, gouvernement, wagtail, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://sites.beta.gouv.fr/
docs_sitehttps://sites.beta.gouv.fr/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

74Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — demo/justfile, docs/Makefile, justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdemo/justfile, docs/Makefile, justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

43Weak
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
42.6/55Manageable file sizes — 104/462 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes2,035,581
source_files_sampled462
oversized_source_files104

Key facts

65GitHub stars
22contributors
288commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
51releases
1bus factor
35open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • pypi package 'demo' points at a different repository (UNKNOWN); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 23:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIsites-conformes>=3.2.0rc1demo/pyproject.toml
npmtarteaucitronjs^1.33.0package.json
PyPIdjango-dsfr>=2.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwagtail>=7.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg2-binary>=2.9.10pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdj-database-url>=3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgunicorn>=23.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdj-static>=0.0.6pyproject.toml
PyPIwhitenoise<7.0,>=6.6pyproject.toml
PyPIwagtailmenus>=4.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIwagtail-modeladmin>=2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwagtail-markdown>=0.12.1pyproject.toml
PyPIunidecode>=1.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-storages>=1.14.6pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3==1.35.99pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.13.4pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-taggit>=6.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwagtail-localize>=1.12.1pyproject.toml
PyPIicalendar>=6.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIfaker>=37.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrust-just>=1.40.0pyproject.toml
PyPImozilla-django-oidc>=4.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIwand>=0.6.13pyproject.toml
PyPIwagtail-honeypot>=1.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIsentry-sdk>=2.61.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 132

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 106 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmtarteaucitronjs1.34.0direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0direct
PyPIboto31.35.99direct
PyPIdj-database-url3.1.2direct
PyPIdj-static0.0.6direct
PyPIdjango6.0.7direct
PyPIdjango-dsfr3.5.2direct
PyPIdjango-storages1.14.6direct
PyPIdjango-taggit6.1.0direct
PyPIfaker40.31.0direct
PyPIgunicorn26.0.0direct
PyPIicalendar7.2.0direct
PyPImozilla-django-oidc5.0.2direct
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.12direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2direct
PyPIrust-just1.56.0direct
PyPIsentry-sdk2.66.0direct
PyPIunidecode1.4.0direct
PyPIwagtail7.4.2direct
PyPIwagtail-honeypot1.3.1direct
PyPIwagtail-localize1.13.1direct
PyPIwagtail-markdown0.14.1direct
PyPIwagtail-modeladmin2.4.0direct
PyPIwagtailmenus4.0.7direct
PyPIwand0.7.2direct
PyPIwhitenoise6.12.0direct
npm@playwright/test1.61.1indirect
npm@types/node22.20.1indirect
npmdotenv16.6.1indirect
npmdotenv-expand11.0.7indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmplaywright1.61.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.61.1indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
PyPIanyascii0.3.3indirect
PyPIasgiref3.12.1indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIbotocore1.35.99indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcssbeautifier2.0.3indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdemo0.1.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdjango-appconf1.2.0indirect
PyPIdjango-cogwheels0.3indirect
PyPIdjango-compressor4.6.0indirect
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar7.0.0indirect
PyPIdjango-filter26.1indirect
PyPIdjango-modelcluster6.5indirect
PyPIdjango-permissionedforms0.1indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs-ext6.0.7indirect
PyPIdjango-tasks0.12.0indirect
PyPIdjango-treebeard5.3.0indirect
PyPIdjango-widget-tweaks1.5.1indirect
PyPIdjangorestframework3.17.1indirect
PyPIdjlint1.40.7indirect
PyPIdraftjs-exporter5.2.0indirect
PyPIeditorconfig0.17.1indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.30.0indirect
PyPIfiletype1.2.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIipython9.15.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsbeautifier2.0.3indirect
PyPIjson50.15.0indirect
PyPIlaces0.1.2indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py—indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImodelsearch1.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser—indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIpillow-heif1.4.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpolib1.2.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.4indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrcssmin1.2.2indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.10indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrjsmin1.2.5indirect
PyPIruff0.15.21indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.10.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton—indirect
PyPIsphinx-wagtail-theme—indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.5indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstatic30.7.0indirect
PyPItblib3.2.2indirect
PyPItelepath0.3.1indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.6.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwillow1.12.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with numerique-gouv/content-manager. Read them side by side →

99wagtail/wagtailA Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experienceExceptional98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional96paperless-ngx/paperless-ngxA community-supported supercharged document management system: scan, index and archive all your documentsExceptional96django-helpdesk/django-helpdeskA Django application to manage tickets for an internal helpdesk. Formerly known as Jutda Helpdesk.Exceptional98strapi/strapi🚀 Strapi is the leading open-source headless CMS. It’s 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, fully customizable, and developer-first.Exceptional97dnnsoftware/Dnn.PlatformDNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is the leading open source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.