Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 17:13 UTC

nuodb / nuodb-helm-charts

NuoDB Helm Chart for Kubernetes & OpenShift

GoBSD-3-Clause★ 8 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗

nuodb/nuodb-helm-charts holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NuoDB, Inc.Organization
11 followers36 public repossince Dec 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nuodb/nuodb-helm-charts/v3v3.12.1-173 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
13/18Commit volume27 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year27
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~124.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv3.12.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases124.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
8.7/25Forks12 forks
6.2/15Watchers14 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars8
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth18 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.305
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance353/396 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 20/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs353
open_issues2
closed_issues20
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs43
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
7.8/25Owner reach11 followers of nuodb
23.4/25Track record36 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnuodb
public_repos36
account_age_days5,327
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/nuodb/nuodb-helm-charts/v3
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnuodb, database, helm, helm-charts, kubernetes, k8s
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 20/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53.3/55Manageable file sizes2/66 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes190,355
source_files_sampled66
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
18contributors
27commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
22releases
2bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 17:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 20/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/semver/v3v3.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yamlv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratestv0.46.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquotev0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51go.mod
Gogithub.com/kedacore/keda/v2v2.17.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/otiai10/copyv1.14.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoringv0.79.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.32.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.32.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20241210054802-24370beab758go.mod
All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 75 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yaml1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratest0.46.8direct
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquote0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51direct
Gogithub.com/kedacore/keda/v22.17.2direct
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v33.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/otiai10/copy1.14.0direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoring0.79.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.10.0direct
Gok8s.io/api0.32.2direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.32.2direct
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20241210054802-24370beab758direct
Gofilippo.io/edwards255191.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.55.5indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/boombuler/barcode1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v22.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.12.1indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch/v55.9.11indirect
Gogithub.com/expr-lang/expr1.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v22.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errors1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysql1.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-models0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocket1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/go-commons0.17.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrap1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierror1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespath0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.17.11indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-zglob0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedir1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/spdystream0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/mxk/go-flowrate0.0.0-20140419014527-cca7078d478findirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/pquerna/otp1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.63.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v22.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v22.27.0indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float160.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetrics0.0.0-20231213231151-1d8dd44e695eindirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20250210185358-939b2ce775acindirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.13.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.32.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.31.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.11.0indirect
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v22.4.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.6indirect
Gogopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v44.12.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver0.32.1indirect
Gok8s.io/client-go0.32.2indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.130.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20241212222426-2c72e554b1e7indirect
Goknative.dev/pkg0.0.0-20250326102644-9f3e60a9244cindirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.19.7indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20241014173422-cfa47c3a1cc8indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.5.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.4.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.