Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 11:38 UTC

nvuillam / npm-groovy-lint

Lint, format and auto-fix your Groovy / Jenkinsfile / Gradle files using command line

JavaScript · GroovyMIT★ 247 stars⑂ 70 forkssince Feb 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#linter #lint #groovy #groovy-language #code-quality-analyzer #ci #jenkinsfile #codenarc #gradle #nextflow #megalinter #sarif #sarif-report #hacktoberfest

nvuillam/npm-groovy-lint holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (66/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nicolas VuillamyPersonal account

381 followers178 public repossince Feb 2016Cloudity & OX Security

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	npm-groovy-lint	18.0.0	115,360	225	76 days ago	groovy lint jenkinsfile codenarc format linter formatter auto-fix refactor gradle

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36	Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 127 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	127
human_commit_share	0.44
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	22

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 50 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 76 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~22.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	50
latest_release_tag	v18.0.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	76
mean_days_between_releases	22.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

57Moderate

How it's scored

38.8/60	Stars — 247 stars
15.3/25	Forks — 70 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	70
stars	247
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	13
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

84Excellent

How it's scored

67.5/80	Monthly downloads — 115,360 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	npm-groovy-lint
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	115,360
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 31 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	31
top_contributor_share	0.893

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good

How it's scored

41.6/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
23.9/30	PR acceptance — 321/403 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	321
open_issues	2
closed_issues	200
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.99
closed_unmerged_prs	82
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.6/25	Owner reach — 381 followers of nvuillam
25/25	Track record — 178 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	381
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	nvuillam
public_repos	178
account_age_days	3,853

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 76 days ago
20/20	Version history — 225 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	npm-groovy-lint
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	76

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

82Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://nvuillam.github.io/npm-groovy-lint/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 14 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	linter, lint, groovy, groovy-language, code-quality-analyzer, ci, jenkinsfile, codenarc, gradle, nextflow, megalinter, sarif, sarif-report, hacktoberfest
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://nvuillam.github.io/npm-groovy-lint/
docs_site	https://nvuillam.github.io/npm-groovy-lint/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate

How it's scored

0/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no data
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	6.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CII-Best-Practices, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	83
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:npm-groovy-lint@18.0.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 83 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

70Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.5/40	Legible commit history — 21 of 44 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.477
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	5,956

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 53 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.07
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.53

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/106 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	25,284
source_files_sampled	106
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

247GitHub stars

31contributors

127commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

50releases

1bus factor

2open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 70 ⇿

0Stars

70Forks

50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 9Minor 15Patch 26

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10

6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 11:37 UTC

0	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9	CI-Tests	28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
n/a	CII-Best-Practices	internal error: error during http.Do: Get "https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects.json?url=https://github.com/nvuillam/npm-groovy-lint": Get "https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects.json?url=https://github.com/nvuillam/npm-groovy-lint": dial tcp: lookup www.bestpractices.dev on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving
0	Code-Review	Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	java-caller	`^6.0.0`	package.json
npm	js-yaml	`^5.0.0`	package.json
npm	node-sarif-builder	`^5.0.0`	package.json
npm	optionator	`^0.9.0`	package.json

All dependencies 177

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 172 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	java-caller	`6.0.0`	direct
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.1`	direct
npm	js-yaml	`5.4.1`	direct
npm	node-sarif-builder	`5.0.0`	direct
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	direct
npm	@bcoe/v8-coverage	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.10.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/fs-minipass	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@istanbuljs/schema	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/istanbul-lib-coverage	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/sarif	`2.1.7`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	adm-zip	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.9`	indirect
npm	browser-stdout	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	buffer-crc32	`0.2.13`	indirect
npm	c8	`12.0.0`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	chownr	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	cliui	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	diff	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.9.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.4`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.12.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-unicode-supported	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.5.2`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.9`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	minizlib	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	mocha	`11.8.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	njre	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	pend	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.9.6`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	randombytes	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.4`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	serialize-javascript	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`8.2.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	tar	`7.5.22`	indirect
npm	test-exclude	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	v8-to-istanbul	`9.3.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	workerpool	`9.3.4`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yallist	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs	`18.1.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`22.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-unparser	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	yauzl	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:npm-groovy-lint@18.0.0 pulls in 83 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records