Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 05:05 UTC

oliverklee-de / oelib

TYPO3 library extension "oelib"

PHPGPL-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Nov 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#typo3-cms-extension#typo3#hacktoberfest#php

oliverklee-de/oelib holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

oliverklee.deOrganization
1 follower17 public repossince Oct 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistoliverklee/oelibv6.3.111,5317764 days agotemplatinglibraryextension

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

97Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 229 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year229
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year48

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 66 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 64 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~84 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count66
latest_release_tagv6.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release64
mean_days_between_releases84
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

6Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
54.2/80Monthly downloads — 11,531 downloads/month across packagist
4/20Registry dependents — 3 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesoliverklee/oelib
dependents3
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads882,595
monthly_downloads11,531
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 75% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.748

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance — 1,730/1,776 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,730
open_issues76
closed_issues556
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.88
closed_unmerged_prs46
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of oliverklee-de
10.7/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginoliverklee-de
public_repos17
account_age_days287
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 64 days ago
20/20Version history — 77 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesoliverklee/oelib
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish64

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.oliverklee.de/typo3-services/seminarmanager/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstypo3-cms-extension, typo3, hacktoberfest, php
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.oliverklee.de/typo3-services/seminarmanager/
docs_sitehttps://www.oliverklee.de/typo3-services/seminarmanager/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 2/91 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes112,173
source_files_sampled91
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

0GitHub stars
13contributors
229commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
66releases
1bus factor
76open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 05:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/dbal^2.13.8 || ^3.9composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php80^1.31.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^11.5.41 || ^12.4.41composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase^11.5.41 || ^12.4.41composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid^11.5.41 || ^12.4.41composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend^11.5.41 || ^12.4.41composer.json
Packagisttypo3fluid/fluid^2.7.4 || ^4.0.2composer.json
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/dbal—direct
Packagistpsr/log—direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php80—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend—direct
Packagisttypo3fluid/fluid—direct
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalize2.52.0indirect
Packagistext-dom—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-libxml—indirect
Packagistext-zip—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.95.15indirect
Packagisthelmich/typo3-typoscript-lint—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint1.4.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.4.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan1.12.32indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit1.4.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules1.6.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.6.35indirect
Packagistrector/type-perfect1.0.0indirect
Packagistsaschaegerer/phpstan-typo31.10.2indirect
Packagistsjbr/static-info-tables—indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirect
Packagistssch/typo3-rector2.15.2indirect
Packagistssch/typo3-rector-testing-framework2.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/cache—indirect
Packagistsymfony/console—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-extensionmanager—indirect
Packagisttypo3/coding-standards—indirect
Packagisttypo3/testing-framework7.1.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with oliverklee-de/oelib. Read them side by side →

98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional98symfony/symfonyThe Symfony PHP frameworkExceptional98codeigniter4/CodeIgniter4Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)Exceptional98Sylius/SyliusHeadless open-source eCommerce platform on top of PHP/Symfony/API PlatformExceptional97dunglas/dunglasapibundleThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional96PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheetA pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet filesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.