Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-01 14:10 UTC

omenien / omena-css

Semantic CSS tooling for diagnostics, transformations, modules, Sass, editor workflows, and evidence-aware builds.

Rust · TypeScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindEditor extensionhow this is determined
#classnames#css-modules#lsp#scss#typescript#vscode-extension

omenien/omena-css holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

omenienOrganization
1 follower14 public repossince Apr 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 5,244 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year5,244
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 64 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count64
latest_release_tagvscode-v5.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases8.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate
How it's scored
36.5/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
14.7/30PR acceptance — 55/112 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs55
open_issues7
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.868
closed_unmerged_prs57
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of omenien
9.1/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginomenien
public_repos14
account_age_days106
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 16 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://omena.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsclassnames, css-modules, lsp, scss, typescript, vscode-extension
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://omena.dev
docs_sitehttps://omena.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — rust/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/engine-shadow-runner/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/engine-style-parser/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — apps/docs/tsconfig.json, client/tsconfig.json, examples/tsconfig.json, packages/check-orchestrator/tsconfig.json, packages/cme-checker/tsconfig.json, packages/vitest-cme/tsconfig.json, scripts/fixtures/real-workspace-lint-corpus/tsconfig.json, server/checker-cli/tsconfig.json, server/engine-core-ts/tsconfig.json, server/engine-host-node/tsconfig.json, server/lsp-server/tsconfig.json, server/tsconfig.json, shared/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/backend-typecheck-smoke/flow-relations/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/backend-typecheck-smoke/path-alias/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/backend-typecheck-smoke/template-literals/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/lsp-stdio-smoke/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/type-fact-backend-parity/composite/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/type-fact-backend-parity/literal-union/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/type-fact-backend-parity/path-alias/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/docs/tsconfig.json, client/tsconfig.json, examples/tsconfig.json, packages/check-orchestrator/tsconfig.json, packages/cme-checker/tsconfig.json, packages/vitest-cme/tsconfig.json, scripts/fixtures/real-workspace-lint-corpus/tsconfig.json, server/checker-cli/tsconfig.json, server/engine-core-ts/tsconfig.json, server/engine-host-node/tsconfig.json, server/lsp-server/tsconfig.json, server/tsconfig.json, shared/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/backend-typecheck-smoke/flow-relations/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/backend-typecheck-smoke/path-alias/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/backend-typecheck-smoke/template-literals/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/lsp-stdio-smoke/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/type-fact-backend-parity/composite/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/type-fact-backend-parity/literal-union/tsconfig.json, test/_fixtures/type-fact-backend-parity/path-alias/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsrust/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/engine-shadow-runner/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/engine-style-parser/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-abstract-value/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-benchmarks/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-bridge/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-bundler/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-cascade-proof/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-cascade/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-categorical/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-checker/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-cli/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-cross-file-summary/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-cst-typed/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-diff-test/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-engine-input-producers/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-ensemble/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-evidence-graph/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-incremental/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-interner/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-lawvere/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-lsp-server/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-meta-macros/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-napi/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-parser/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-product-hints/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-query-checker-orchestrator/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-query-core/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-query-transform-runner/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-query/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-reachability-datalog-lab/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-reactive/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-refinement-trait/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-refinement/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-resolver/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-rg-flow/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-scss-eval/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-semantic/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-sif/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-smt/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-spec-audit/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-streaming-ifds/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-syntax/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-testkit/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-transform-bundle/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-transform-cst/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-transform-egg/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-transform-passes/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-transform-print/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-transform-target/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-tsgo-client/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-umbrella/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-value-lattice/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-variational/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-wasm/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-zk-audit/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/omena-zk-circuit/Cargo.toml, rust/fuzz/Cargo.toml, tools/raffia-oracle/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.8/55Manageable file sizes — 71/1,776 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes706,076
source_files_sampled1,776
oversized_source_files71

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
5,244commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
64releases
1bus factor
7open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'omena-raffia-oracle' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-01 14:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@omena/sharedworkspace:*client/package.json
npmvscode-languageclient^10.1.0client/package.json
npm@omena/sharedworkspace:*server/package.json
npmfast-glob^3.3.3server/package.json
npmpostcss^8.5.23server/package.json
npmpostcss-less^6.0.0server/package.json
npmpostcss-scss^4.0.9server/package.json
npmtypescript^6.0.3server/package.json
npmvscode-languageserver^10.1.0server/package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-textdocument^1.0.12server/package.json
npmsource-map-js^1.2.1packages/css-build-adapter/package.json
npmfast-glob^3.3.3packages/eslint-plugin/package.json
npm@omena/css-build-adapterworkspace:*packages/postcss-plugin/package.json
npmsource-map-js^1.2.1packages/postcss-plugin/package.json
npm@omena/css-build-adapterworkspace:*packages/vite-plugin/package.json
crates.ioomena-parser—tools/raffia-oracle/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraffia=0.12.3tools/raffia-oracle/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0tools/raffia-oracle/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0tools/raffia-oracle/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with omenien/omena-css. Read them side by side →

98prettier/prettierPrettier is an opinionated code formatter.Exceptional98cloudscape-design/componentsReact components for Cloudscape Design SystemExceptional96Shopify/ruby-lspAn opinionated language server for RubyExceptional96forcedotcom/salesforcedx-vscodeSalesforce Extensions for VS CodeExceptional96AmadeusITGroup/otterThe Otter project is a highly modular framework whose goal is to provide a common platform to accelerate and facilitate the development of runtime customizable Angular based Web ApplicationsExceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.