Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 00:39 UTC

omniauth / omniauth-identity

A simple login and password strategy for OmniAuth.

RubyCustom license★ 363 stars⑂ 99 forkssince Sep 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#omniauth#omniauth-strategy#authentication#authentication-middleware#authentication-strategy

omniauth/omniauth-identity holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (64/100). It was last updated 25 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OmniAuth CommunityOrganization
34 followers23 public repossince Feb 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsomniauth-identity3.2.1-2652 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

67Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 25 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 128 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year128
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push25
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 52 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~67.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv3.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release52
mean_days_between_releases67.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good
How it's scored
41.5/60Stars — 363 stars
16.6/25Forks — 99 forks
6.5/15Watchers — 16 watchers
Inputs used
forks99
stars363
watchers16
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

79Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

83Excellent
How it's scored
66.3/80Total downloads — 2,387,452 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesomniauth-identity
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads2,387,452
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 23 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled23
top_contributor_share0.897

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
40.6/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
19.6/30PR acceptance — 72/110 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs72
open_issues2
closed_issues59
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.967
closed_unmerged_prs38
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.1/25Owner reach — 34 followers of omniauth
22.1/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginomniauth
public_repos23
account_age_days3,866

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 52 days ago
20/20Version history — 26 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesomniauth-identity
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish52

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 41 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/omniauth-identity/3.2.1
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsomniauth, omniauth-strategy, authentication, authentication-middleware, authentication-strategy
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://www.rubydoc.info/gems/omniauth-identity/3.2.1
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

63Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages151
unassessed_packages20
affected_by_severitylow 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 151 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

51Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6/40Legible commit history — 11 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.112
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,617

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

85Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 1/37 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes93,868
source_files_sampled37
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

363GitHub stars
23contributors
128commits, last 12 months
25days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
2open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 99 ⇿
0Stars
99Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801009532011-122019-042026-08
Major 1Minor 2Patch 12

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 00:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsnomono—Gemfile
RubyGemsirb~> 1.17Gemfile
All dependencies 171

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 169 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsirb1.18.0direct
RubyGemsnomono1.0.8direct
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.3indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord—indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.3indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_active_record—indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_active_record1.0.9indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader—indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2—indirect
RubyGemsappraisal23.1.4indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2-rubocop0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsauth-sanitizer—indirect
RubyGemsauth-sanitizer0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsbackports3.25.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt—indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.22indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit—indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit0.9.3indirect
RubyGemscgi0.5.2indirect
RubyGemscmdparse3.0.7indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdelegate0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsdry-configurable1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-core1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-inflector1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsdry-initializer3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-logic1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-schema1.16.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-types1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsemoji_regex15.0.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.4indirect
RubyGemsgem_bench2.0.5indirect
RubyGemsgeom2d0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsgitmoji-regex—indirect
RubyGemsgitmoji-regex2.0.4indirect
RubyGemshashie5.1.0indirect
RubyGemshexapdf1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.1indirect
RubyGemskettle-dev—indirect
RubyGemskettle-dev2.3.4indirect
RubyGemskettle-rb0.1.1indirect
RubyGemskettle-soup-cover3.0.0indirect
RubyGemskettle-test—indirect
RubyGemskettle-test2.0.10indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.5.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m—indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsomniauth—indirect
RubyGemsomniauth2.1.4indirect
RubyGemsopenssl4.0.2indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.28.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel_tests5.7.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.11.1indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.4.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack2.2.23indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-test—indirect
RubyGemsrack-test1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.17.0indirect
RubyGemsreek6.5.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrequire_bench—indirect
RubyGemsrequire_bench1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-block_is_expected1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-pending_for—indirect
RubyGemsrspec-pending_for0.1.21indirect
RubyGemsrspec-stubbed_env1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec_junit_formatter0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.87.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-capybara2.23.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-env0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-factory_bot2.28.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-gradual0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts12.3.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts-rspec1.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-md2.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.39.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-on-rbs2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-packaging0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec-extra0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec_rails2.32.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ruby2_43.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-thread_safety0.7.3indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar—indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby_engine2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsruby_version1.0.3indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssilent_stream1.0.12indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.0.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-cobertura4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-console0.9.5indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-rcov0.3.7indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_lcov_formatter0.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard1.55.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-custom1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsstandard-performance1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-rspec0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-rubocop-lts2.0.10indirect
RubyGemsstone_checksums—indirect
RubyGemsstone_checksums1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimecop0.9.11indirect
RubyGemstimecop-rspec1.0.3indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsturbo_tests2—indirect
RubyGemsturbo_tests23.1.8indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem—indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem1.1.14indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemsyaml-converter0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsyard0.9.45indirect
RubyGemsyard-fence0.9.6indirect
RubyGemsyard-junk0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-relative_markdown_links0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-timekeeper0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsyard-yaml0.2.3indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.2indirect
RubyGemszlib3.2.3indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 151 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
json2.21.1indirectlow12.21.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with omniauth/omniauth-identity. Read them side by side →

84clerk/clerk-sdk-rubyAccess the Clerk Backend API from RubyExcellent80lynndylanhurley/devise_token_authToken based authentication for Rails JSON APIs. Designed to work with jToker and ng-token-auth.Excellent99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional89mezzio/mezzio-authentication-oauth2OAuth2 (server) authentication middleware for Mezzio and PSR-7 applications.Excellent87mezzio/mezzio-authenticationAuthentication middleware for Mezzio and PSR-7 applicationsExcellent78ellaisys/aws-cognitoAWS Cognito package (with MFA, SRP and Passkeys Feature) for PHP/LaravelGood

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.