Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 23:01 UTC

omniauth / omniauth-ldap

📁 LDAP strategy for OmniAuth

RubyCustom license★ 148 stars⑂ 155 forkssince Oct 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#ldap#ldap-authentication#omniauth#ruby#rubygem

omniauth/omniauth-ldap holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OmniAuth CommunityOrganization
34 followers23 public repossince Feb 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsomniauth-ldap3.0.2-1753 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 179 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year179
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 53 days ago
5.4/27Release cadence — a release every ~444 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv3.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release53
mean_days_between_releases444
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate
How it's scored
35.2/60Stars — 148 stars
18.2/25Forks — 155 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks155
stars148
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

79Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

76Good
How it's scored
61.2/80Total downloads — 768,694 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesomniauth-ldap
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads768,694
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 59% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 34 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled34
top_contributor_share0.59

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
15.5/30PR acceptance — 44/85 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs44
open_issues0
closed_issues44
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs41
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.1/25Owner reach — 34 followers of omniauth
22.1/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginomniauth
public_repos23
account_age_days3,866

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 53 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesomniauth-ldap
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish53

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 32 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/omniauth-ldap/3.0.2
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsldap, ldap-authentication, omniauth, ruby, rubygem
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://www.rubydoc.info/gems/omniauth-ldap/3.0.2
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

68Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages168
unassessed_packages20
affected_by_severitylow 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 168 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

52Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7.5/40Legible commit history — 13 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.14
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,617

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07

Code legibility for models

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
52.5/55Manageable file sizes — 1/22 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes93,868
source_files_sampled22
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — sample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

148GitHub stars
34contributors
179commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
0open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 155 ⇿
0Stars
155Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012010632011-102018-092025-08
Major 1Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10
6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 23:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemskettle-family~> 1.2Gemfile
RubyGemsnomono~> 1.1Gemfile
RubyGemsirb~> 1.17Gemfile
All dependencies 188

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsirb1.18.0direct
RubyGemskettle-family1.2.43direct
RubyGemsnomono1.1.4direct
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader—indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2—indirect
RubyGemsappraisal23.2.0indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2-rubocop1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsauth-sanitizer—indirect
RubyGemsauth-sanitizer0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsbackports3.25.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit—indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit0.9.3indirect
RubyGemscgi0.5.2indirect
RubyGemscitrus3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscmdparse3.0.7indirect
RubyGemscolsole1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscommand_kit0.6.0indirect
RubyGemscommand_kit-completion0.3.0indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker2.9.0indirect
RubyGemscompletely0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdelegate0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsdocopt_ng0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsdry-configurable1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-core1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-inflector1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsdry-initializer3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-logic1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-schema1.16.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-types1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsemoji_regex15.0.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsgem_bench2.0.5indirect
RubyGemsgeom2d0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsgitmoji-regex—indirect
RubyGemsgitmoji-regex2.0.11indirect
RubyGemshashie5.1.0indirect
RubyGemshexapdf1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.1indirect
RubyGemskettle-dev—indirect
RubyGemskettle-dev2.5.26indirect
RubyGemskettle-drift1.0.12indirect
RubyGemskettle-gha-pins0.3.6indirect
RubyGemskettle-ndjson0.1.11indirect
RubyGemskettle-rb0.1.9indirect
RubyGemskettle-soup-cover3.0.9indirect
RubyGemskettle-test—indirect
RubyGemskettle-test2.0.19indirect
RubyGemskettle-wash0.1.3indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.5.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmarkly0.16.0indirect
RubyGemsmister_bin0.9.0indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-ldap—indirect
RubyGemsnet-ldap0.20.0indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsomniauth—indirect
RubyGemsomniauth2.1.4indirect
RubyGemsopenssl4.0.2indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.28.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel_tests5.7.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.11.1indirect
RubyGemsparslet2.0.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.4.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemspyu-ruby-sasl—indirect
RubyGemspyu-ruby-sasl0.0.3.3indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack—indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-test—indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.127indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.17.0indirect
RubyGemsreek6.5.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrequire_bench—indirect
RubyGemsrequire_bench1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsroda—indirect
RubyGemsroda3.106.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-block_is_expected1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-pending_for0.1.21indirect
RubyGemsrspec-stubbed_env1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec_junit_formatter0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.88.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-capybara2.23.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-env0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-factory_bot2.28.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-gradual0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts8.3.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts-rspec1.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-md2.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.40.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-on-rbs2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-packaging0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec-extra0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec_rails2.32.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ruby2_23.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-thread_safety0.7.3indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar—indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby_engine2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsruby_version1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrubyntlm—indirect
RubyGemsrubyntlm0.6.5indirect
RubyGemsservice_actor3.9.4indirect
RubyGemssilent_stream1.0.12indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.0.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-cobertura4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-console0.9.5indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-rcov0.3.7indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_lcov_formatter0.9.0indirect
RubyGemssorbet-runtime0.6.13420indirect
RubyGemsstandard1.56.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-custom1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsstandard-performance1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-rspec0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-rubocop-lts2.0.10indirect
RubyGemsstone_checksums—indirect
RubyGemsstone_checksums1.0.8indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstrings-ansi0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimecop0.9.11indirect
RubyGemstimecop-rspec1.0.3indirect
RubyGemstoken-resolver2.0.9indirect
RubyGemstoml0.3.0indirect
RubyGemstoml-rb4.2.1indirect
RubyGemstree_sitter_language_pack1.14.3indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstty-cursor0.7.1indirect
RubyGemstty-progressbar0.18.3indirect
RubyGemstty-screen0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsturbo_tests2—indirect
RubyGemsturbo_tests23.2.4indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem—indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem1.1.15indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemsyaml-converter0.2.4indirect
RubyGemsyard0.9.45indirect
RubyGemsyard-fence0.9.7indirect
RubyGemsyard-junk0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-lint1.10.2indirect
RubyGemsyard-relative_markdown_links0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-timekeeper0.2.5indirect
RubyGemsyard-yaml0.2.4indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.2indirect
RubyGemszlib3.2.3indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 168 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
json2.21.1indirectlow12.21.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with omniauth/omniauth-ldap. Read them side by side →

89galtzo-floss/flag_shih_tzu🏁 Bit fields for ActiveRecordExcellent88karafka/waterdropStandalone Karafka library for producing Kafka messagesExcellent87dry-rb/dry-cliGeneral purpose Command Line Interface (CLI) framework for RubyExcellent87oxidize-rb/rb-sysEasily build Ruby native extensions in RustExcellent87webhippie/gettext_i18n_rails_jsExtends gettext_i18n_rails making your .PO files available to client side javascript as JSONExcellent87ruby-oauth/auth-sanitizer🟥 Configurable KV output redactionExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.