Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 01:19 UTC

onsi / ginkgo

A Modern Testing Framework for Go

GoMIT★ 9,043 stars⑂ 707 forkssince Aug 2013View on GitHub ↗

#golang #testing #test #test-driven-development #bdd #bdd-framework #go

onsi/ginkgo holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated 17 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Onsi FakhouriPersonal account

531 followers68 public repossince Jan 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2	v2.32.1	-	83	17 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 17 days ago
18/36	Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18	Commit volume — 88 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	88
human_commit_share	0.95
days_since_last_push	17
active_weeks_last_year	26

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~23.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v2.32.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	17
mean_days_between_releases	23.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

95Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 9,043 stars
23.7/25	Forks — 707 forks
11.1/15	Watchers — 99 watchers

Inputs used

forks	707
stars	9,043
watchers	99
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.598

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

37.6/42	Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
22.8/30	PR acceptance — 529/695 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	529
open_issues	96
closed_issues	823
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.896
closed_unmerged_prs	166
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.6/25	Owner reach — 531 followers of onsi
25/25	Track record — 68 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	531
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	onsi
public_repos	68
account_age_days	5,707

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20	Version history — 83 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://onsi.github.io/ginkgo/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	golang, testing, test, test-driven-development, bdd, bdd-framework, go
has_wiki	yes
homepage	http://onsi.github.io/ginkgo/
docs_site	http://onsi.github.io/ginkgo/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 13/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 77 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

79Good

How it's scored

24.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: golang.org/x/sys 0.31.0 (unknown), golang.org/x/sys v0.43.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
34.8/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 97 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	79
affected_packages	14
assessed_packages	134
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 5, moderate 2, low 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 134 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

15Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.2/40	Legible commit history — 27 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.284
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Gemfile.lock, go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	ginkgo/performance/_fixtures/performance_fixture/go.mod, go.mod, integration/_fixtures/version_mismatch_fixture/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.05

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/412 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	118,119
source_files_sampled	412
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

9,043GitHub stars

99contributors

88commits, last 12 months

17days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

96open issues

Go, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 707 ⇿

0Stars

707Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 38Patch 61

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 01:18 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9	CI-Tests	12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 13/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 28 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	17 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	77 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3	`v3.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gkampitakis/go-snaps	`v0.5.15`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3	`v3.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/pprof	`v0.0.0-20260402051712-545e8a4df936`	go.mod
Go	github.com/joshdk/go-junit	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mfridman/tparse	`v0.18.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/onsi/gomega	`v1.40.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.43.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.44.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 121 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/gkampitakis/go-snaps	`v0.5.15`	direct
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.3`	direct
Go	github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3	`v3.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/pprof	`v0.0.0-20260402051712-545e8a4df936`	direct
Go	github.com/joshdk/go-junit	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/masterminds/semver/v3	`v3.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/mfridman/tparse	`v0.18.0`	direct
Go	github.com/onsi/gomega	`1.13.0`	direct
Go	github.com/onsi/gomega	`1.20.1`	direct
Go	github.com/onsi/gomega	`v1.40.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`0.31.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.43.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.44.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gkampitakis/ciinfo	`v0.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/gkampitakis/go-diff	`v1.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-yaml	`v1.18.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`0.5.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`1.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/pretty	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/text	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/maruel/natural	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/onsi/ginkgo	`1.16.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2	`2.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.13.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tdewolff/minify/v2	`2.9.17`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/gjson	`v1.18.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/match	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/pretty	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/sjson	`v1.2.5`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.4`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`0.35.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.35.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`0.38.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.53.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.20.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`0.23.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.36.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.7`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v2	`2.4.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`3.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	activesupport	`6.1.7.5`	indirect
RubyGems	addressable	`2.8.7`	indirect
RubyGems	base64	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	coffee-script	`2.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	coffee-script-source	`1.12.2`	indirect
RubyGems	colorator	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	commonmarker	`0.23.11`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.4`	indirect
RubyGems	csv	`3.3.2`	indirect
RubyGems	dnsruby	`1.72.3`	indirect
RubyGems	em-websocket	`0.5.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ethon	`0.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	eventmachine	`1.2.7`	indirect
RubyGems	execjs	`2.10.0`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday	`2.12.2`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday-net_http	`3.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ffi	`1.17.1`	indirect
RubyGems	forwardable-extended	`2.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	gemoji	`4.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	github-pages	`232`	indirect
RubyGems	github-pages-health-check	`1.18.2`	indirect
RubyGems	html-pipeline	`2.14.3`	indirect
RubyGems	http_parser.rb	`0.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`1.14.6`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll	`3.10.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-avatar	`0.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-coffeescript	`1.2.2`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-commonmark	`1.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-commonmark-ghpages	`0.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-default-layout	`0.1.5`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-feed	`0.17.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-gist	`1.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-github-metadata	`2.16.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-include-cache	`0.2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-mentions	`1.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-optional-front-matter	`0.3.2`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-paginate	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-readme-index	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-redirect-from	`0.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-relative-links	`0.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-remote-theme	`0.4.3`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-sass-converter	`1.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-seo-tag	`2.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-sitemap	`1.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-swiss	`1.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-architect	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-cayman	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-dinky	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-hacker	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-leap-day	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-merlot	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-midnight	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-minimal	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-modernist	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-primer	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-slate	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-tactile	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-theme-time-machine	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-titles-from-headings	`0.5.3`	indirect
RubyGems	jekyll-watch	`2.2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jemoji	`0.13.0`	indirect
RubyGems	json	`2.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown	`2.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown-parser-gfm	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	liquid	`4.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	listen	`3.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.6.4`	indirect
RubyGems	mercenary	`0.3.6`	indirect
RubyGems	minima	`2.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest	`5.25.4`	indirect
RubyGems	net-http	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nokogiri	`1.18.9`	indirect
RubyGems	octokit	`4.25.1`	indirect
RubyGems	pathutil	`0.16.2`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`5.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	racc	`1.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rb-fsevent	`0.11.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rb-inotify	`0.11.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`3.4.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rouge	`3.30.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubyzip	`2.3.2`	indirect
RubyGems	safe_yaml	`1.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	sass	`3.7.4`	indirect
RubyGems	sass-listen	`4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	sawyer	`0.9.2`	indirect
RubyGems	simpleidn	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	terminal-table	`1.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	typhoeus	`1.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	tzinfo	`2.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-display_width	`1.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	uri	`1.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	webrick	`1.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`2.7.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 134 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`0.35.0`	indirect	critical	32	`0.52.0`
activesupport	`6.1.7.5`	indirect	high	3	`8.1.2.1`
addressable	`2.8.7`	indirect	high	1	`2.9.0`
concurrent-ruby	`1.3.4`	indirect	high	3	`1.3.7`
faraday	`2.12.2`	indirect	high	3	`2.14.3`
nokogiri	`1.18.9`	indirect	high	11	`1.19.4`
golang.org/x/net	`0.38.0`	indirect	moderate	11	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.53.0`	indirect	moderate	8	`1.27.0-rc.3`
json	`2.9.1`	indirect	low	1	`2.19.9`
golang.org/x/sys	`0.31.0`	direct	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.43.0`	direct	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.35.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/text	`0.23.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.36.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records