Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-15 21:17 UTC

open-feature / python-sdk-contrib

Community contributions for hooks and reference providers in python

PythonNo license detected★ 27 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

open-feature/python-sdk-contrib holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (64/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OpenFeatureOrganization · verified domain
1,552 followers60 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api1.0.0321,7461167 days ago—
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-core2.0.0321,68120 days ago—
PyPIopenfeature-provider-flagd0.5.2295,9781876 days ago—
PyPIopenfeature-provider-flipt0.1.342,4871632 days ago—
PyPIopenfeature-provider-ofrep0.3.0251,8224161 days ago—
PyPIopenfeature-hooks-opentelemetry0.3.196,7216240 days ago—
PyPIopenfeature-provider-aws-ssm0.1.1251240 days agoopenfeatureawsssmparameter-storefeature-flags

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
17.3/18Commit volume — 84 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year84
human_commit_share0.51
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count39
latest_release_tagopenfeature-flagd-core/v2.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases23.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23/60Stars — 27 stars
12.5/25Forks — 33 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks33
stars27
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,330,460 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesopenfeature-flagd-api, openfeature-flagd-core, openfeature-provider-flagd, openfeature-provider-flipt, openfeature-provider-ofrep, openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry, openfeature-provider-aws-ssm
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,330,460
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.2
How it's scored
28.9/42Issue resolution — 69% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 311/351 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs311
open_issues26
closed_issues57
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.687
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
22.9/25Owner reach — 1,552 followers of open-feature
22.3/25Track record — 60 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,552
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginopen-feature
public_repos60
account_age_days1,707

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 18 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesopenfeature-flagd-api, openfeature-flagd-core, openfeature-provider-flagd, openfeature-provider-flipt, openfeature-provider-ofrep, openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry, openfeature-provider-aws-ssm
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://openfeature.dev
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://openfeature.dev
docs_sitehttps://openfeature.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

82Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:openfeature-flagd-api@1.0.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://openfeature.dev/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 50 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://openfeature.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — providers/openfeature-provider-env-var/src/openfeature/contrib/provider/envvar/py.typed, providers/openfeature-provider-ofrep/src/openfeature/py.typed, providers/openfeature-provider-unleash/src/openfeature/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/testkit/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-api/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/api/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-core/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/core/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 32 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsproviders/openfeature-provider-env-var/src/openfeature/contrib/provider/envvar/py.typed, providers/openfeature-provider-ofrep/src/openfeature/py.typed, providers/openfeature-provider-unleash/src/openfeature/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/testkit/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-api/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/api/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-core/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/core/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.32
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (providers/openfeature-provider-env-var/src/openfeature/contrib/provider/envvar/py.typed, providers/openfeature-provider-ofrep/src/openfeature/py.typed, providers/openfeature-provider-unleash/src/openfeature/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/testkit/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-api/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/api/py.typed, tools/openfeature-flagd-core/src/openfeature/contrib/tools/flagd/core/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/109 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes19,345
source_files_sampled109
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

27GitHub stars
27contributors
84commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
39releases
3bus factor
26open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'openfeature-python-contrib' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'openfeature-flagd-api-testkit' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 33 ⇿
0Stars
33Forks
37Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383322022-102024-092026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10
7.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-15 21:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 8/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained24 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 40
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIopenfeature-hooks-opentelemetry—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-aws-ssm—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-env-var—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-flagd—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-flipt—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-ofrep—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-unleash—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-core—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api-testkit—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.4hooks/openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api—hooks/openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions>=0.50b0hooks/openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2providers/openfeature-provider-aws-ssm/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.28.0providers/openfeature-provider-aws-ssm/pyproject.toml
PyPIcachebox>=5.1.0,<6.0.0providers/openfeature-provider-aws-ssm/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2providers/openfeature-provider-env-var/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2providers/openfeature-provider-flagd/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-core>=1.0.0,<2providers/openfeature-provider-flagd/pyproject.toml
PyPIgrpcio>=1.82.1providers/openfeature-provider-flagd/pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf>=7.35.1,<8.0.0providers/openfeature-provider-flagd/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.1providers/openfeature-provider-flagd/pyproject.toml
PyPIcachebox>=5.1.0,<6.0.0providers/openfeature-provider-flagd/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.7.0providers/openfeature-provider-flipt/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-provider-ofrep>=0.2.0providers/openfeature-provider-flipt/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2providers/openfeature-provider-ofrep/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.27.0providers/openfeature-provider-ofrep/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2providers/openfeature-provider-unleash/pyproject.toml
PyPIUnleashClient>=6.3.0providers/openfeature-provider-unleash/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api—tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest>=8.4.0tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest-bdd>=8.1.0tools/openfeature-flagd-api-testkit/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2tools/openfeature-flagd-api/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api>=1.0.0,<2tools/openfeature-flagd-core/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenfeature-sdk>=0.8.2tools/openfeature-flagd-core/pyproject.toml
PyPImmh3>=5.0.0,<6.0.0tools/openfeature-flagd-core/pyproject.toml
PyPIpanzi-json-logic==1.0.1tools/openfeature-flagd-core/pyproject.toml
PyPIsemver>=3,<4tools/openfeature-flagd-core/pyproject.toml
PyPIcbor2>=5.6.5,<6.0.0tools/openfeature-flagd-core/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 145

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 43 direct and 102 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIboto3—direct
PyPIboto31.40.61direct
PyPIcachebox—direct
PyPIcachebox5.2.3direct
PyPIcbor2—direct
PyPIcbor25.9.0direct
PyPIgrpcio—direct
PyPIgrpcio1.82.1direct
PyPImmh3—direct
PyPImmh35.2.1direct
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api—direct
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api1.0.0direct
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-api-testkit0.1.0direct
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-core—direct
PyPIopenfeature-flagd-core1.0.0direct
PyPIopenfeature-hooks-opentelemetry0.3.1direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-aws-ssm0.1.1direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-env-var0.1.1direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-flagd0.5.2direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-flipt0.1.3direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-ofrep—direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-ofrep0.3.0direct
PyPIopenfeature-provider-unleash0.1.2direct
PyPIopenfeature-sdk—direct
PyPIopenfeature-sdk0.8.4direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.41.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions—direct
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.62b1direct
PyPIpanzi-json-logic1.0.1direct
PyPIprotobuf—direct
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1direct
PyPIpytest—direct
PyPIpytest9.0.3direct
PyPIpytest-bdd—direct
PyPIpytest-bdd8.1.0direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPIrequests2.33.1direct
PyPIsemver—direct
PyPIsemver3.0.4direct
PyPIunleashclient—direct
PyPIunleashclient6.7.0direct
PyPIaioboto3—indirect
PyPIaioboto315.5.0indirect
PyPIaiobotocore2.25.1indirect
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.1indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIapscheduler3.11.2indirect
PyPIasserts—indirect
PyPIasserts0.14.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbotocore1.40.61indirect
PyPIbotocore-stubs1.42.41indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage—indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIdocker7.1.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfcache0.6.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgherkin-official29.0.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-health-checking—indirect
PyPIgrpcio-health-checking1.82.1indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIidna3.16indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIlaunchdarkly-eventsource1.5.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.9.0indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImoto—indirect
PyPImoto5.1.22indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPImypy1.20.2indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIopenfeature-python-contrib0.0.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.1indirect
PyPIparse1.21.1indirect
PyPIparse-type0.6.6indirect
PyPIpastel0.2.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs3.11.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpoethepoet—indirect
PyPIpoethepoet0.44.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary—indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.12indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIrequests-mock—indirect
PyPIrequests-mock1.12.1indirect
PyPIresponses0.26.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.14.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItestcontainers—indirect
PyPItestcontainers4.14.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItypes-aioboto3—indirect
PyPItypes-aioboto315.5.0indirect
PyPItypes-aiobotocore3.5.0indirect
PyPItypes-aiobotocore-ssm2.25.2indirect
PyPItypes-awscrt0.31.3indirect
PyPItypes-boto3—indirect
PyPItypes-boto31.42.95indirect
PyPItypes-boto3-ssm1.42.54indirect
PyPItypes-grpcio—indirect
PyPItypes-grpcio1.0.0.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf—indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf7.34.1.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml—indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-requests—indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-s3transfer0.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuv-build—indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.4indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
PyPIyggdrasil-engine1.3.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:openfeature-flagd-api@1.0.0 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.