Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 02:52 UTC

open-telemetry / opamp-spec

OpAMP Specification

MakefileApache-2.0★ 160 stars⑂ 63 forkssince Nov 2021View on GitHub ↗

open-telemetry/opamp-spec holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (36/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OpenTelemetry - CNCFOrganization · verified domain

8,080 followers112 public repossince Apr 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
23.5/36	Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 104 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	104
human_commit_share	0.38
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	34

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 20 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 67 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~64.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	20
latest_release_tag	v0.20.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	67
mean_days_between_releases	64.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate

How it's scored

35.7/60	Stars — 160 stars
14.9/25	Forks — 63 forks
7.1/15	Watchers — 20 watchers

Inputs used

forks	63
stars	160
watchers	20
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

65Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 32 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	32
top_contributor_share	0.515

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

27.9/42	Issue resolution — 66% of issues closed
28/30	PR acceptance — 248/266 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	248
open_issues	43
closed_issues	85
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	3
prs_decided_30d	4
issue_closed_ratio	0.664
closed_unmerged_prs	18
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 8,080 followers of open-telemetry
25/25	Track record — 112 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	8,080
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	open-telemetry
public_repos	112
account_age_days	2,733

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

42Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

81Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

76Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
3/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	210
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 2, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 210 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 38 of 38 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 62 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.62

Code legibility for models

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Makefile without a type-check config
0/55	Manageable file sizes — no source files detected

Inputs used

primary_language	Makefile
largest_source_bytes	—
source_files_sampled	0
oversized_source_files	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Manageable file sizes. Remaining weights renormalized.

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — proto/opamp/v1/anyvalue.proto, proto/opamp/v1/opamp.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	proto/opamp/v1/anyvalue.proto, proto/opamp/v1/opamp.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

160GitHub stars

32contributors

104commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

20releases

1bus factor

43open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 63 ⇿

0Stars

63Forks

20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 20Patch 0

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.6 / 10

7.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 02:52 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9	CI-Tests	29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	24 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
6	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6	Vulnerabilities	4 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 210

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 210 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@oozcitak/dom	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	@oozcitak/infra	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	@oozcitak/url	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@oozcitak/util	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	@textlint/ast-node-types	`15.8.0`	indirect
npm	@textlint/markdown-to-ast	`15.8.0`	indirect
npm	@types/debug	`4.1.13`	indirect
npm	@types/katex	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@types/mdast	`3.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/ms	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`2.0.11`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	anchor-markdown-header	`0.8.4`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ast-types	`0.13.4`	indirect
npm	async	`3.2.6`	indirect
npm	bail	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	basic-ftp	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	boundary	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.12`	indirect
npm	ccount	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	character-entities	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	character-entities	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	character-entities-legacy	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	character-entities-legacy	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	character-reference-invalid	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	character-reference-invalid	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	cheerio	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	cheerio-select	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	css-select	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	css-what	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	data-uri-to-buffer	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decode-named-character-reference	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	deep-extend	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	degenerator	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	devlop	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	doctoc	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	domutils	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	domutils	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	encoding-sniffer	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	fault	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	format	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	get-uri	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	html-link-extractor	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	htmlparser2	`10.1.0`	indirect
npm	htmlparser2	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`9.1.0`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`9.1.0`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.10`	indirect
npm	ini	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.7.2`	indirect
npm	is-absolute-url	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-alphabetical	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-alphabetical	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-alphanumerical	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-alphanumerical	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-buffer	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	is-decimal	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-decimal	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-hexadecimal	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-hexadecimal	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-relative-url	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	jsonc-parser	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	jsonpointer	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	katex	`0.16.47`	indirect
npm	link-check	`5.6.0`	indirect
npm	linkify-it	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	loglevel	`1.9.2`	indirect
npm	longest-streak	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`7.18.3`	indirect
npm	markdown-it	`14.3.2`	indirect
npm	markdown-link-check	`3.15.0`	indirect
npm	markdown-link-extractor	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	markdown-table	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	markdownlint	`0.41.1`	indirect
npm	markdownlint-cli	`0.49.1`	indirect
npm	marked	`18.0.14`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-find-and-replace	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-footnote	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-from-markdown	`0.8.5`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-frontmatter	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-gfm	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-gfm-autolink-literal	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-gfm-strikethrough	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-gfm-table	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-gfm-task-list-item	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-to-markdown	`0.6.5`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-to-string	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mdurl	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	micromark	`2.11.4`	indirect
npm	micromark	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	micromark-core-commonmark	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-directive	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-footnote	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-frontmatter	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm	`0.3.3`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-autolink-literal	`0.5.7`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-autolink-literal	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-footnote	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-strikethrough	`0.6.5`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-table	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-table	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-tagfilter	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-gfm-task-list-item	`0.3.3`	indirect
npm	micromark-extension-math	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	micromark-factory-destination	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-factory-label	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-factory-space	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-factory-title	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-factory-whitespace	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-character	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-chunked	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-classify-character	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-combine-extensions	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-decode-numeric-character-reference	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-encode	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-html-tag-name	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-normalize-identifier	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-resolve-all	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-sanitize-uri	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-subtokenize	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-symbol	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-types	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	needle	`3.5.0`	indirect
npm	neotraverse	`0.6.18`	indirect
npm	netmask	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	node-email-verifier	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	pac-proxy-agent	`9.1.0`	indirect
npm	pac-resolver	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-entities	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	parse-entities	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	parse5-htmlparser2-tree-adapter	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	parse5-parser-stream	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	progress	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	proxy-agent	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	proxy-agent-negotiate	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	punycode.js	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	quickjs-wasi	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	remark-footnotes	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	remark-frontmatter	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	remark-gfm	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	remark-parse	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	remove-markdown	`0.6.4`	indirect
npm	repeat-string	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	run-con	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	smart-buffer	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	smol-toml	`1.7.2`	indirect
npm	socks	`2.8.10`	indirect
npm	socks-proxy-agent	`10.1.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	string-width	`8.2.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	structured-source	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	trough	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	uc.micro	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	undici	`7.29.1`	indirect
npm	unified	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-stringify-position	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	validator	`13.15.35`	indirect
npm	vfile	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	vfile-message	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlbuilder2	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	zwitch	`1.0.5`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 210 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
basic-ftp	`5.3.1`	indirect	high	1	`6.2.1`
js-yaml	`5.2.3`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.4.1`
smol-toml	`1.7.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.9.0`
katex	`0.16.47`	indirect	low	1	`0.18.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records