Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 00:13 UTC

openhab / openhab-jruby

A Helper Library for Writing openHAB Automations in Ruby

RubyEPL-2.0★ 6 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#home-automation

openhab/openhab-jruby holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (91/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

openHABOrganization
1,109 followers53 public repossince Aug 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsopenhab-scripting5.50.0-2780 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18Commit volume — 92 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year92
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 90 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count90
latest_release_tagv5.50.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases20
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

20At Risk
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars6
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (EPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good
How it's scored
57.8/80Total downloads — 361,481 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesopenhab-scripting
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads361,481
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.361

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent
How it's scored
38.1/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance — 466/491 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 16/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs466
open_issues5
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.906
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
21.9/25Owner reach — 1,109 followers of openhab
24.6/25Track record — 53 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,109
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginopenhab
public_repos53
account_age_days5,441
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 278 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesopenhab-scripting
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

91Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.openhab.org/addons/automation/jrubyscripting/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshome-automation
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.openhab.org/addons/automation/jrubyscripting/
docs_sitehttps://www.openhab.org/addons/automation/jrubyscripting/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 16 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 16/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 2/361 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes96,189
source_files_sampled361
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

6GitHub stars
10contributors
92commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
90releases
2bus factor
5open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 00:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests16 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 16/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsjar-dependencies0.4.1Gemfile
All dependencies 88

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 87 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsjar-dependencies0.4.1direct
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.0.1indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbundler—indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker2.6.1indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.6indirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.5indirect
RubyGemscucumber11.1.1indirect
RubyGemscucumber-ci-environment10.0.1indirect
RubyGemscucumber-core16.2.0indirect
RubyGemscucumber-cucumber-expressions17.1.0indirect
RubyGemscucumber-gherkin39.1.0indirect
RubyGemscucumber-html-formatter23.1.0indirect
RubyGemscucumber-messages32.3.1indirect
RubyGemscucumber-tag-expressions6.1.2indirect
RubyGemscuke_linter1.3.0indirect
RubyGemscuke_modeler3.30.0indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.1indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.3indirect
RubyGemsgem-release2.2.4indirect
RubyGemsgene_pool1.5.0indirect
RubyGemshttparty0.24.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsirb1.16.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.18.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmarcel—indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmemoist31.0.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source—indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsmulti_test1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmulti_xml0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.0indirect
RubyGemsopenhab5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.10.0indirect
RubyGemspastel0.8.0indirect
RubyGemspersistent_http1.0.6indirect
RubyGemspersistent_httparty0.1.2indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsprocess_exists0.2.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.3.1indirect
RubyGemspuma6.6.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.11.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.124indirect
RubyGemsrdoc7.0.3indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.11.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.82.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.49.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-inst1.2.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.9.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemssys-uname1.5.1indirect
RubyGemstimecop0.9.10indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstty-color0.6.0indirect
RubyGemstty-command0.10.1indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsyaml-lint0.1.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with openhab/openhab-jruby. Read them side by side →

84postlund/pyatvA client library for Apple TV and AirPlay devicesExcellent78Supergiovane/node-red-contrib-knx-ultimateControl your KNX intallation via Node-Red! A bunch of KNX nodes, with integrated Philips HUE control and ETS group address importer.Good99home-assistant/core:house_with_garden: Open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first.Exceptional98esphome/esphomeESPHome is a system to control your ESP32, ESP8266, BK72xx, RP2040 by simple yet powerful configuration files and control them remotely through Home Automation systems.Exceptional94homeassistant-ai/ha-mcpThe Unofficial and Awesome Home Assistant MCP ServerExceptional94ioBroker/ioBroker.js-controllerioBroker controllerExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.