Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 02:38 UTC

openswoole / swoole-src

Programmatic server for PHP with async IO, coroutines and fibers

C++ · PHPApache-2.0★ 858 stars⑂ 55 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗
#openswoole#php#async#coroutines#concurrency

openswoole/swoole-src holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated 123 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OpenswooleOrganization
461 followers15 public repossince Aug 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistopenswoole/ext-openswoolepoints to another repo — not scoreddev-master8-123 days agoextensionopenswooleext-openswooleopen-swoole

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

48Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

30At Risk
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 123 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume — 65 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year65
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push123
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

74Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 140 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~166.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv26.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release140
mean_days_between_releases166.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

69Good
How it's scored
47.6/60Stars — 858 stars
14.4/25Forks — 55 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks55
stars858
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

58Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 55% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.547

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
30.6/42Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 186/201 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs186
open_issues49
closed_issues131
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.728
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
19.2/25Owner reach — 461 followers of openswoole
18.5/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers461
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginopenswoole
public_repos15
account_age_days1,786
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://openswoole.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopenswoole, php, async, coroutines, concurrency
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://openswoole.com
docs_sitehttps://openswoole.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
53.1/55Manageable file sizes — 14/404 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes192,587
source_files_sampled404
oversized_source_files14

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

858GitHub stars
100contributors
65commits, last 12 months
123days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
49open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • packagist package 'openswoole/ext-openswoole' points at a different repository (https://github.com/openswoole/ext-openswoole); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 02:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 25 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistclue/stream-filter1.7.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.3.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.8.0indirect
Packagistnyholm/psr71.8.2indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphp-http/client-common2.7.3indirect
Packagistphp-http/discovery1.20.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/httplug2.4.1indirect
Packagistphp-http/message1.16.2indirect
Packagistphp-http/message-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/promise1.3.1indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.0.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with openswoole/swoole-src. Read them side by side →

94swoole/swoole-src🚀 Coroutine-based concurrency library for PHPExceptional91php-standard-library/php-standard-libraryPHP Standard LibraryExcellent90dereuromark/cakephp-queueQueue plugin for CakePHP - simple, pure PHP and without dependencies.Excellent96microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional92rtic-rs/rticReal-Time Interrupt-driven Concurrency (RTIC) framework for ARM Cortex-M microcontrollersExcellent91awslabs/shuttleShuttle is a library for testing concurrent Rust codeExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.