Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-28 01:11 UTC

opentelekomcloud / terraform-provider-opentelekomcloud

Terraform T Cloud Public (OpenTelekomCloud) provider

GoMPL-2.0★ 110 stars⑂ 93 forkssince Dec 2017View on GitHub ↗

opentelekomcloud/terraform-provider-opentelekomcloud holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (65/100). It was last updated today. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

T Cloud Public (formerly Open Telekom Cloud)Organization

78 followers72 public repossince May 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/opentelekomcloud/terraform-provider-opentelekomcloud	v1.37.2	-	228	4 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
34.6/36	Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 219 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	219
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	50

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.1 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v1.37.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	4
mean_days_between_releases	10.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate

How it's scored

33/60	Stars — 110 stars
16.4/25	Forks — 93 forks
6.2/15	Watchers — 14 watchers

Inputs used

forks	93
stars	110
watchers	14
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

88Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

88Excellent

How it's scored

45.9/54	Bus factor — 5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 16% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 32 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	5
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.156

Issue & PR responsiveness

97Exceptional

How it's scored

40.3/42	Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
28.9/30	PR acceptance — 1,902/1,971 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,902
open_issues	60
closed_issues	1,424
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.96
closed_unmerged_prs	69
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
13.6/25	Owner reach — 78 followers of opentelekomcloud
25/25	Track record — 72 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	78
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	opentelekomcloud
public_repos	72
account_age_days	3,727

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20	Version history — 228 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/opentelekomcloud/terraform-provider-opentelekomcloud
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml, tox.ini
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://registry.terraform.io/providers/opentelekomcloud/opentelekomcloud/latest
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://registry.terraform.io/providers/opentelekomcloud/opentelekomcloud/latest
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 32 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

83Excellent

How it's scored

24.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go v1.37.0 (unknown), golang.org/x/crypto v0.52.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,627 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	5
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	62
unassessed_packages	5
affected_by_severity	unknown 4
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 62 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — GNUmakefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml, tox.ini
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	GNUmakefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/1,199 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	79,983
source_files_sampled	1,199
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—

Key facts

110GitHub stars

99contributors

219commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

5bus factor

60open issues

Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch pypi package 'terraform_provider_opentelekomcloud' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 93 ⇿

0Stars

93Forks

97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 4Patch 93

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10

6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-28 01:11 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 32 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 20

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/GehirnInc/crypt	`v0.0.0-20230320061759-8cc1b52080c5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/apparentlymart/go-cidr	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go	`v1.37.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.7.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp	`v0.5.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cty	`v1.4.1-0.20200723130312-85980079f637`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror	`v1.1.2-0.20250313123807-1ee6e1a1957a`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid	`v1.0.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-version	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2	`v2.24.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jinzhu/copier	`v0.3.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jmespath/go-jmespath	`v0.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/keybase/go-crypto	`v0.0.0-20200123153347-de78d2cb44f4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/opentelekomcloud/gophertelekomcloud	`v0.9.9-0.20260727102019-5ac96946e868`	go.mod
Go	github.com/unknwon/com	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.52.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.20.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v2	`v2.4.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 67

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 47 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/apparentlymart/go-cidr	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go	`v1.37.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gehirninc/crypt	`v0.0.0-20230320061759-8cc1b52080c5`	direct
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.7.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp	`v0.5.2`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cty	`v1.4.1-0.20200723130312-85980079f637`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror	`v1.1.2-0.20250313123807-1ee6e1a1957a`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid	`v1.0.3`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-version	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2	`v2.24.1`	direct
Go	github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/jinzhu/copier	`v0.3.5`	direct
Go	github.com/jmespath/go-jmespath	`v0.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/keybase/go-crypto	`v0.0.0-20200123153347-de78d2cb44f4`	direct
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/opentelekomcloud/gophertelekomcloud	`v0.9.9-0.20260727102019-5ac96946e868`	direct
Go	github.com/unknwon/com	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.52.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.20.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v2	`v2.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/agext/levenshtein	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v13	`v13.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cloudflare/circl	`v1.6.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.13.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`v1.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-checkpoint	`v0.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-hclog	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin	`v1.4.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/hc-install	`v0.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2	`v2.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/logutils	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-exec	`v0.17.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-json	`v0.14.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go	`v0.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-log	`v0.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-address	`v0.0.0-20220623143253-7d51757b572c`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost	`v0.0.0-20200729002733-f050f53b9734`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/yamux	`v0.0.0-20181012175058-2f1d1f20f75d`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/pretty	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/copystructure	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface	`v1.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrap	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/reflectwalk	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/oklog/run	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/protonmail/go-crypto	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack	`v4.0.4+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v4	`v4.3.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/zclconf/go-cty	`v1.12.1`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.55.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.45.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.37.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/appengine	`v1.6.7`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto	`v0.0.0-20230410155749-daa745c078e1`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.82.1`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	indirect
PyPI	myst-parser	`—`	indirect
PyPI	otc-sphinx-directives	`—`	indirect
PyPI	otcdocstheme	`—`	indirect
PyPI	reno	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 62 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go	`v1.37.0`	direct	unknown	2	—
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.52.0`	direct	unknown	1	—
golang.org/x/net	`v0.55.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.56.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.37.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records