Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-03 08:46 UTC

os-climate / physrisk

Physical climate risk calculation engine

Python · TeXApache-2.0★ 67 stars⑂ 57 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗

os-climate/physrisk holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (57/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OS-ClimateOrganization
235 followers96 public repossince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIphysrisk-lib1.9.212,25510110 days agophysicalclimateriskfinance

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 108 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year108
human_commit_share0.74
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year32

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.7 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv1.9.21
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases3.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29.5/60Stars — 67 stars
14.6/25Forks — 57 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks57
stars67
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.7/80Monthly downloads — 2,255 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesphysrisk-lib
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,255
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 62% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.622
How it's scored
30.8/42Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 415/509 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs415
open_issues21
closed_issues58
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.734
closed_unmerged_prs94
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.1/25Owner reach — 235 followers of os-climate
23.3/25Track record — 96 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers235
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginos-climate
public_repos96
account_age_days1,889

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history — 101 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesphysrisk-lib
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://physrisk.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://physrisk.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 42 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages58
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:physrisk-lib@1.9.21 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 58 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 73 of 74 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.986
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/135 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes52,189
source_files_sampled135
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

67GitHub stars
21contributors
108commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
21open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 57 ⇿
0Stars
57Forks
30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605422022-072024-072026-07
Major 0Minor 5Patch 25

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 08:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 8/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities42 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaffine>=2.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdependency-injector>=4.48.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgeopandas>=1.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIh3>=4.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlmdbm>=0.0.6pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml>=6.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumba>=0.61.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpint>=0.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=12.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyproj>=3.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.32.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIshapely>=2.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIs3fs>=2025.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIvirtualenv>=20.36.1pyproject.toml
PyPIzarr>=2.18.0,<3.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 210

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 190 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaffine2.4.0direct
PyPIaiohttp3.14.0direct
PyPIdependency-injector4.49.0direct
PyPIgeopandas1.1.3direct
PyPIh34.4.2direct
PyPIlmdbm0.0.6direct
PyPIlxml6.1.1direct
PyPInumba0.65.1direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPIpillow12.2.0direct
PyPIpint0.24.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpyproj3.7.1direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIs3fs2026.4.0direct
PyPIscipy1.15.3direct
PyPIshapely2.1.2direct
PyPIvirtualenv21.3.3direct
PyPIzarr2.18.3direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIaiobotocore3.7.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIapeye1.4.1indirect
PyPIapeye-core1.1.5indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIasciitree0.3.3indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.5.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIautodocsumm0.2.15indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIbleach4.1.0indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.0indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIbrotlicffi1.2.0.1indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.3indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.0indirect
PyPIcssselect20.9.0indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.20indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdict2css0.5.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.20.1indirect
PyPIdomdf-python-tools3.10.0indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfasteners0.20indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIflexcache0.3indirect
PyPIflexparser0.4indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.4.0indirect
PyPIgraphviz0.21indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.1indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.2.0indirect
PyPIipython8.39.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-cache1.0.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.8.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIlatexcodec3.0.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIlibsass0.23.0indirect
PyPIllvmlite0.47.0indirect
PyPIlmdb2.2.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune3.2.1indirect
PyPImsgpack1.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-nb1.4.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.1indirect
PyPInarwhals2.21.2indirect
PyPInatsort8.4.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.4indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInbsphinx0.9.5indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumcodecs0.13.1indirect
PyPInumpydoc1.9.0indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpandoc2.4indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.6indirect
PyPIplotly6.7.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIplumbum1.10.0indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpybtex0.26.1indirect
PyPIpybtex-docutils1.0.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydata-sphinx-theme0.15.4indirect
PyPIpydyf0.12.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyogrio0.12.1indirect
PyPIpyphen0.17.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.10.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.3.1indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.13indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.10.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools-git-versioningindirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.3indirect
PyPIsphinx7.4.7indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints2.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-jinja2-compat0.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-prompt1.8.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-simplepdf1.6.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.4.5indirect
PyPIsphinx-toggleprompt0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-toolbox3.8.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-bibtex2.6.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-details-directive0.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.49indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstandard-imghdr3.10.14indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItinyhtml52.1.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.5indirect
PyPItox4.54.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.7.0indirect
PyPIweasyprint68.1indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwheelindirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
PyPIzopfli0.4.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:physrisk-lib@1.9.21 pulls in 58 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.