Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 16:39 UTC

osprey-oss / deptry

Find unused, missing and transitive dependencies in a Python project.

PythonMIT★ 1,468 stars⑂ 49 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

osprey-oss/deptry holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Osprey OSSOrganization
9 followers7 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdeptry0.25.111,242,15885161 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume358 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year358
human_commit_share0.07
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year50
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases87 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 161 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~63.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count87
latest_release_tag0.25.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release161
mean_days_between_releases63.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.4/60Stars1,468 stars
14/25Forks49 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks49
stars1,468
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads11,242,158 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdeptry
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads11,242,158
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 64% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.639
How it's scored
33.2/42Issue resolution79% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance1,366/1,424 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,366
open_issues44
closed_issues166
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.79
closed_unmerged_prs58
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach9 followers of osprey-oss
7.7/25Track record7 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginosprey-oss
public_repos7
account_age_days201

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 161 days ago
20/20Version history85 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdeptry
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish161

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://deptry.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdependencies, poetry, python, cicd, pep621, rust
has_wikino
homepagehttps://deptry.com/
docs_sitehttps://deptry.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages4
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:deptry@0.25.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 4 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance93 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, pdm.lock, poetry.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.93
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/148 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes19,152
source_files_sampled148
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,468GitHub stars
15contributors
358commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
87releases
1bus factor
44open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'deptryrs' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 49 ⇿
0Stars
49Forks
45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504822022-092024-092026-08
Major 0Minor 19Patch 25

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 16:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iochardetng=1.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioencoding_rs=0.8.35Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore=0.4.33Cargo.toml
crates.iolog=0.4.33Cargo.toml
crates.iopath-slash=0.2.1Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3=0.29.2Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3-log=0.13.4Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon=1.12.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex=1.13.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioruff_python_astCargo.toml
crates.ioruff_python_parserCargo.toml
crates.ioruff_source_fileCargo.toml
crates.ioruff_text_sizeCargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json=1.0.151Cargo.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0.0,<9pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama>=0.4.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=23.2pyproject.toml
PyPIrequirements-parser>=0.11.0,<1pyproject.toml
PyPItomli>=2.0.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 200

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iochardetng1.0.0direct
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8.35direct
crates.ioignore0.4.33direct
crates.iolog0.4.33direct
crates.iopath-slash0.2.1direct
crates.iopyo30.29.2direct
crates.iopyo3-log0.13.4direct
crates.iorayon1.12.0direct
crates.ioregex1.13.1direct
crates.ioruff_python_ast0.0.9direct
crates.ioruff_python_parser0.0.9direct
crates.ioruff_source_file0.0.9direct
crates.ioruff_text_size0.0.9direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIcolorama0.4.6direct
PyPIpackaging26.3direct
PyPIrequirements-parser0.13.1direct
PyPItomli2.4.1direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioarc-swap1.9.2indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.8indirect
crates.ioattribute-derive0.10.5indirect
crates.ioattribute-derive-macro0.10.5indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.iobstr1.13.1indirect
crates.iocastaway0.2.4indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iochar_str0.0.2indirect
crates.iocollection_literals1.0.3indirect
crates.iocompact_str0.10.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.ioderive-where1.6.1indirect
crates.iodrop_bomb0.1.5indirect
crates.ioeither1.18.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioget-size-derive20.10.3indirect
crates.ioget-size20.10.3indirect
crates.iogetopts0.2.24indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.ioglobset0.4.20indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iointerpolator0.5.0indirect
crates.iois-macro0.3.8indirect
crates.ioitertools0.15.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iomanyhow0.11.4indirect
crates.iomanyhow-macros0.11.4indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioordermap1.2.0indirect
crates.iophf0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_codegen0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_generator0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_shared0.11.3indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.15.0indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.ioproc-macro-utils0.10.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.29.2indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ioquote-use0.8.4indirect
crates.ioquote-use-macros0.8.4indirect
crates.iorand0.8.7indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.3.1indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioruff_python_trivia0.0.9indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.3indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.iosiphasher1.0.3indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iostatic_assertions1.1.0indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.3indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iothin-vec0.2.19indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.20indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.20indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.12.0indirect
crates.iotinyvec_macros0.1.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.25indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iounicode_names21.3.0indirect
crates.iounicode_names2_generator1.3.0indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.56indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.56indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIanysqlite0.0.5indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.2indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackports-zstd1.7.0indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcleo2.1.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcrashtest0.4.1indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdeepmerge3.0indirect
PyPIdep-logic0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeptry0.0.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdulwich1.2.12indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.22.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIfindpython0.8.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhishel1.3.1indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinline-snapshot0.35.4indirect
PyPIinstaller1.0.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpbs-installer2026.8.14indirect
PyPIpdm2.28.2indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.12.1.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpoetry2.4.1indirect
PyPIpoetry-core2.4.0indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrapidfuzz3.14.5indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIresolvelib1.2.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsocksio1.0.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers2026.6.1.19indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItypes-colorama0.4.15.20260508indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPIunearth0.18.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.39.1indirect
PyPIxattr1.3.0indirect
PyPIzensical0.0.56indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:deptry@0.25.1 pulls in 4 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.