Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-07 02:28 UTC

panoramicdata / PanoramicData.OData.Client

A crazy-fast, MIT-licensed OData Client

C#MIT★ 15 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

panoramicdata/PanoramicData.OData.Client holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Panoramic Data LimitedOrganization
12 followers119 public repossince May 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetPanoramicData.OData.Client10.0.109-340 days agoodataodata4clientrestapihttplinqquerypagination

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 110 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year110
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 30 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tag10.0.109
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases8.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

24At Risk
How it's scored
18.6/60Stars — 15 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars15
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapp.codacy.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.6/80Total downloads — 30,428 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesPanoramicData.OData.Client
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads30,428
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.54

Issue & PR responsiveness

56Moderate
How it's scored
39.2/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
6.8/30PR acceptance — 5/22 decided PRs merged
10.4/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues1
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.933
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d5

Ownership & stewardship

79Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
8/25Owner reach — 12 followers of panoramicdata
25/25Track record — 119 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginpanoramicdata
public_repos119
account_age_days3,002
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 34 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesPanoramicData.OData.Client
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

68Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40Legible commit history — 44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.44
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,489

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

39Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj, PanoramicData.OData.Client/PanoramicData.OData.Client.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestsPanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj, PanoramicData.OData.Client/PanoramicData.OData.Client.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/141 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes29,375
source_files_sampled141
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

15GitHub stars
3contributors
110commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
1open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345522025-122026-042026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 29
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-07 02:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetAwesomeAssertions.Analyzers—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.msbuild—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetMoq—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test/PanoramicData.OData.Client.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—PanoramicData.OData.Client/PanoramicData.OData.Client.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub—PanoramicData.OData.Client/PanoramicData.OData.Client.csproj
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with panoramicdata/PanoramicData.OData.Client. Read them side by side →

99axios/axiosPromise based HTTP client for the browser and node.jsExceptional94dotnet/dev-proxySimulate API failures, throttling, and chaos — all from your command line.Exceptional97discordjs/discord.jsA powerful JavaScript library for interacting with the Discord APIExceptional96expressjs/expressFast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework for node.Exceptional96php-curl-class/php-curl-classPHP Curl Class makes it easy to send HTTP requests and integrate with web APIsExceptional95hoppscotch/hoppscotchOpen-Source API Development Ecosystem • https://hoppscotch.io • Offline, On-Prem & Cloud • Web, Desktop & CLI • Open-Source Alternative to Postman, InsomniaExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.