Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 21:17 UTC

pantheon-systems / wp-redis

WordPress Object Cache using Redis.

PHPGPL-2.0★ 247 stars⑂ 66 forkssince Sep 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined

pantheon-systems/wp-redis holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (51/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PantheonOrganization · verified domain
216 followers97 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistpantheon-systems/wp-redis1.4.75,03134268 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence17/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume30 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share0.73
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases37 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 268 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~112.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tag1.4.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release268
mean_days_between_releases112.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.8/60Stars247 stars
15.1/25Forks66 forks
9.6/15Watchers55 watchers
Inputs used
forks66
stars247
watchers55
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescircleci.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.4/80Monthly downloads5,031 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20Registry dependents2 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagespantheon-systems/wp-redis
dependents2
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads71,579
monthly_downloads5,031
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 74% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.735
How it's scored
35.1/42Issue resolution84% of issues closed
23.1/30PR acceptance310/403 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 19/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs310
open_issues26
closed_issues132
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.835
closed_unmerged_prs93
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.8/25Owner reach216 followers of pantheon-systems
25/25Track record97 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers216
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginpantheon-systems
public_repos97
account_age_days5,751
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 268 days ago
20/20Version history34 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespantheon-systems/wp-redis
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish268

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-redis/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscaching, redis, wordpress, wordpress-plugin, hacktoberfest, object-cache
has_wikino
homepagehttps://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-redis/
docs_sitehttps://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-redis/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 19/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
4.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages81
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://wordpress.org/llms.txt)
38.7/40Legible commit history53 of 73 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://wordpress.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.726
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance26 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.26
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/7 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes51,525
source_files_sampled7
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

247GitHub stars
30contributors
30commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
26open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 66 ⇿
0Stars
66Forks
36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756522014-112020-032025-07
Major 1Minor 11Patch 24

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 21:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 19/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 82 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistautomattic/vipwpcs3.1.0indirect
Packagistbehat/behat3.29.0indirect
Packagistbehat/gherkin4.17.0indirect
Packagistbehat/mink1.13.0indirect
Packagistbehat/mink-browserkit-driver2.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator2.0.0indirect
Packagistfig-r/psr2r-sniffer2.3.0indirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-extension2.7.5indirect
Packagistmasterminds/html52.10.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.14.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistpantheon-systems/pantheon-wordpress-upstream-testsindirect
Packagistpantheon-systems/pantheon-wp-coding-standards3.0.2indirect
Packagistpantheon-systems/wpunit-helpers2.0.7indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-collective/code-sniffer0.3.1indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibility9.3.5indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/phpcompatibility-paragonie1.3.4indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/phpcompatibility-wp2.1.8indirect
Packagistphpcsstandards/phpcsextra1.5.1indirect
Packagistphpcsstandards/phpcsutils1.2.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.32indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.6.36indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.10indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistsirbrillig/phpcs-variable-analysis2.13.0indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.22.1indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit6.4.42indirect
Packagistsymfony/config6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/console6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector6.4.34indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler6.4.40indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.4.43indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation6.4.42indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter6.4.42indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml6.4.43indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistwp-coding-standards/wpcs3.4.1indirect
Packagistyoast/phpunit-polyfills4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.