Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 15:16 UTC

para-cms / para

Rails complete admin interface builder

Ruby · CSSMIT★ 12 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Sep 2014View on GitHub ↗

para-cms/para holds a health index of 16 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (43/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 1981 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

16
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

16
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 32 is calibrated to 26 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ParaOrganization
0 followers6 public repossince Nov 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsparapoints to another repo — not scored0.12.10-650 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,981 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1,981
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 4 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,616 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~259.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tag0.8.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,616
mean_days_between_releases259.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.9/60Stars — 12 stars
7.5/25Forks — 9 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars12
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.683
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
8.6/30PR acceptance — 2/7 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues8
closed_issues52
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of para-cms
18.2/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpara-cms
public_repos6
account_age_days4,348

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrails, ruby, admin, backoffice, rails-admin, activeadmin, cms, cms-framework
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

23At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 155 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate1.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
5.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: simple_form 3.5.0 (critical 9.8), devise 4.2.0 (moderate 6.1), jquery-rails 4.2.1 (moderate 6.9), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
23.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,772 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories156
affected_packages27
assessed_packages102
unassessed_packages32
affected_by_severitycritical 6, high 13, moderate 7, low 1
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 102 resolved dependencies against OSV. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

27At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/262 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes13,509
source_files_sampled262
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

12GitHub stars
4contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,981days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
8open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • rubygems package 'para' points at a different repository (http://github.com/glyph-fr/para); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810912017-092019-122022-03
Major 0Minor 0Patch 3

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.9 / 10
1.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 15:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities155 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsjquery-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsturbolinks—Gemfile
RubyGemscoffee-rails~> 4.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsdevise>= 3.0Gemfile
RubyGemssimple_form—Gemfile
RubyGemssimple_form_extension—Gemfile
RubyGemskaminari>= 0.16.1Gemfile
RubyGemsransack>= 1.4.1Gemfile
RubyGemsbootstrap-kaminari-views>= 0.0.5Gemfile
RubyGemsredactor-rails—Gemfile
All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsbootstrap-kaminari-views0.0.5direct
RubyGemscoffee-rails—direct
RubyGemscoffee-rails4.1.1direct
RubyGemsdevise—direct
RubyGemsdevise4.2.0direct
RubyGemsjquery-rails—direct
RubyGemsjquery-rails4.2.1direct
RubyGemskaminari—direct
RubyGemskaminari0.17.0direct
RubyGemsransack—direct
RubyGemsransack1.8.2direct
RubyGemssimple_form—direct
RubyGemssimple_form3.5.0direct
RubyGemssimple_form_extension—direct
RubyGemssimple_form_extension1.4.5direct
RubyGemsturbolinks—direct
RubyGemsturbolinks5.0.1direct
RubyGemsactioncable5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactive_decorator—indirect
RubyGemsactive_decorator1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob-status—indirect
RubyGemsactivejob-status0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsarel7.1.4indirect
RubyGemsautoprefixer-rails9.4.2indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.11indirect
RubyGemsbootstrap-sass—indirect
RubyGemsbootstrap-sass3.3.7indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.2.3indirect
RubyGemscancancan—indirect
RubyGemscancancan1.17.0indirect
RubyGemschunky_png1.3.11indirect
RubyGemsclimate_control0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsclosure_tree—indirect
RubyGemsclosure_tree6.6.0indirect
RubyGemscocaine0.5.8indirect
RubyGemscocoon—indirect
RubyGemscocoon1.2.12indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.10.0indirect
RubyGemscompass0.12.2indirect
RubyGemscompass-rails—indirect
RubyGemscompass-rails2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.0.5indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsdeep_cloneable—indirect
RubyGemsdeep_cloneable2.3.2indirect
RubyGemserubis2.7.0indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.7.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.9.25indirect
RubyGemsfont-awesome-rails—indirect
RubyGemsfont-awesome-rails4.7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsfont-awesome-sass—indirect
RubyGemsfont-awesome-sass4.7.0indirect
RubyGemsfriendly_id—indirect
RubyGemsfriendly_id5.2.4indirect
RubyGemsfssm0.2.10indirect
RubyGemsglobalid0.3.7indirect
RubyGemshaml5.0.4indirect
RubyGemshaml-rails—indirect
RubyGemshaml-rails1.0.0indirect
RubyGemshtml2haml2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.1.1indirect
RubyGemsmail2.6.4indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.1indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2016.0521indirect
RubyGemsmimemagic0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.3.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.11.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsorm_adapter0.5.0indirect
RubyGemspaperclip—indirect
RubyGemspaperclip4.3.7indirect
RubyGemspg—indirect
RubyGemspg1.1.3indirect
RubyGemspolyamorous1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrack2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrack-test0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrails—indirect
RubyGemsrails5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrails-i18n—indirect
RubyGemsrails-i18n5.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrailties5.0.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrake11.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.10.3indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.9.10indirect
RubyGemsrequest_store—indirect
RubyGemsrequest_store1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsresponders2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsroo—indirect
RubyGemsroo2.7.1indirect
RubyGemsroo-xls—indirect
RubyGemsroo-xls1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core—indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.8.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.8.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-ole1.2.12.1indirect
RubyGemsruby_parser3.11.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip1.2.2indirect
RubyGemssass3.7.2indirect
RubyGemssass-listen4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssass-rails—indirect
RubyGemssass-rails5.0.7indirect
RubyGemsselectize-rails0.12.3indirect
RubyGemssexp_processor4.11.0indirect
RubyGemsspreadsheet—indirect
RubyGemsspreadsheet1.1.8indirect
RubyGemssprockets3.7.0indirect
RubyGemssprockets-rails3.2.0indirect
RubyGemstemple0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsthor0.19.1indirect
RubyGemsthread_safe0.3.6indirect
RubyGemstilt2.0.8indirect
RubyGemstruncate_html—indirect
RubyGemstruncate_html0.9.3indirect
RubyGemsturbolinks-source5.0.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo1.2.4indirect
RubyGemsvertebra—indirect
RubyGemsvertebra0.1.3indirect
RubyGemswarden1.2.6indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.6.4indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.2indirect
RubyGemswith_advisory_lock4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 27

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 102 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 27 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct. 32 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
simple_form3.5.0directcritical15.0.0
activerecord5.0.0.1indirectcritical48.0.2.1
activesupport5.0.0.1indirectcritical68.1.2.1
nokogiri1.8.1indirectcritical452.2.1
paperclip4.3.7indirectcritical15.2.0
rack2.0.3indirectcritical363.2.6
actionmailer5.0.0.1indirecthigh17.2.1.1
actionpack5.0.0.1indirecthigh107.2.1.1
actionview5.0.0.1indirecthigh78.1.2.1
activejob5.0.0.1indirecthigh15.2.1.1
concurrent-ruby1.0.5indirecthigh31.3.7
crass1.0.3indirecthigh11.0.7
loofah2.1.1indirecthigh62.25.2
rails-html-sanitizer1.0.3indirecthigh71.7.1
rubyzip1.2.2indirecthigh23.4.0
sprockets3.7.0indirecthigh14.0.0.beta8
tzinfo1.2.4indirecthigh11.2.10
websocket-driver0.6.4indirecthigh40.8.2
websocket-extensions0.1.2indirecthigh10.1.5
devise4.2.0directmoderate45.0.4
jquery-rails4.2.1directmoderate34.4.0
kaminari0.17.0directmoderate11.2.1
bcrypt3.1.11indirectmoderate13.1.22
bootstrap-sass3.3.7indirectmoderate65.3.0
mail2.6.4indirectmoderate12.9.1
rake11.3.0indirectmoderate112.3.3
globalid0.3.7indirectlow11.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.