Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 02:40 UTC

phpDocumentor / Reflection

Reflection library to do Static Analysis for PHP Projects

PHPMIT★ 125 stars⑂ 60 forkssince Nov 2012View on GitHub ↗

phpDocumentor/Reflection holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (53/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

phpDocumentorOrganization
54 followers47 public repossince Dec 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection7.0.0898,98156108 days agophpdocreflectionstatic-analysisphpdocumentor

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
17.1/36Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits, discounted for automation: 29 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 101 days
13/18Commit volume — 133 commits in the last year, discounted for automation: 29 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 101 days
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year133
human_commit_share0.29
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year34
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 37 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 108 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~40.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tag7.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release108
mean_days_between_releases40.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34/60Stars — 125 stars
14.8/25Forks — 60 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks60
stars125
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
79.4/80Monthly downloads — 898,981 downloads/month across packagist
13.6/20Registry dependents — 108 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesphpdocumentor/reflection
dependents108
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads28,280,124
monthly_downloads898,981
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 58% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled35
top_contributor_share0.584
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance — 577/695 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs577
open_issues8
closed_issues60
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.882
closed_unmerged_prs118
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.5/25Owner reach — 54 followers of phpDocumentor
24.2/25Track record — 47 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers54
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginphpDocumentor
public_repos47
account_age_days5,397

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 108 days ago
20/20Version history — 56 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesphpdocumentor/reflection
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish108

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://www.phpdoc.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreflection, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttp://www.phpdoc.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — no data
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Code-Review, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages48
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 48 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.3/40Legible commit history — 17 of 29 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.586
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 36 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.36
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/178 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes105,996
source_files_sampled178
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

125GitHub stars
35contributors
133commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
8open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 60 ⇿
0Stars
60Forks
36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605922013-022019-092026-04
Major 4Minor 9Patch 12

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 02:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 15 changesets
10Contributorsproject has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistnikic/php-parser^5.5composer.json
Packagistwebmozart/assert^1.7 || ^2.1composer.json
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 46 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0direct
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1direct
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard13.0.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator2.0.0indirect
Packagisteliashaeussler/phpunit-attributes1.8.0indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php3.0.0indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream1.6.12indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.15indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.26.0indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy-phpunit2.5.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.4.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.13indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-webmozart-assert2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.63indirect
Packagistpsalm/phar6.16.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.18.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 48 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.