Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 08:14 UTC

phpro / grumphp

A PHP code-quality tool

PHPMIT★ 4,311 stars⑂ 450 forkssince Mar 2015View on GitHub ↗

KindPluginCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#code-quality #php #git-hooks #composer-plugin #hacktoberfest

phpro/grumphp holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PHProOrganization

46 followers37 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	phpro/grumphp	v2.23.0	384,073	113	36 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

71Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 16 days ago
15.2/36	Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
16.8/18	Commit volume — 74 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	74
human_commit_share	0.93
days_since_last_push	16
active_weeks_last_year	22

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 36 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~40.2 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v2.23.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	36
mean_days_between_releases	40.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

90Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent

How it's scored

59/60	Stars — 4,311 stars
22.1/25	Forks — 450 forks
10.2/15	Watchers — 69 watchers

Inputs used

forks	450
stars	4,311
watchers	69
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	ci.appveyor.com, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

94Exceptional

How it's scored

74.5/80	Monthly downloads — 384,073 downloads/month across packagist
20/20	Registry dependents — 1,154 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	phpro/grumphp
dependents	1,154
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	17,388,645
monthly_downloads	384,073
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 65% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 49 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.652

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

41.7/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24.9/30	PR acceptance — 578/697 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

merged_prs	578
open_issues	4
closed_issues	483
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.992
closed_unmerged_prs	119
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12/25	Owner reach — 46 followers of phpro
23.5/25	Track record — 37 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	46
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	phpro
public_repos	37
account_age_days	4,623

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20	Version history — 113 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	phpro/grumphp
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	code-quality, php, git-hooks, composer-plugin, hacktoberfest
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

66Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5	Code-Review — Found 5/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 49 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	6.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	110
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 110 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

28At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.5/40	Legible commit history — 48 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.516
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.07

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/438 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	36,190
source_files_sampled	438
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

4,311GitHub stars

99contributors

74commits, last 12 months

16days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

4open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 450 ⇿

0Stars

450Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 58Patch 39

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10

6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 08:14 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4	Code-Review	Found 5/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10	Contributors	project has 49 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 20

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	amphp/amp	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`^2.1`	composer.json
Packagist	doctrine/collections	`^1.6.8 \|\| ^2.0 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	gitonomy/gitlib	`^1.6`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel/serializable-closure	`^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`^2.0 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	ondram/ci-detector	`^4.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/container	`^1.1 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	seld/jsonlint	`^1.8`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/config	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/console	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/dotenv	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/expression-language	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/finder	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/process	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 110

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 90 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.1`	direct
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.4.0`	direct
Packagist	doctrine/collections	`2.6.0`	direct
Packagist	gitonomy/gitlib	`1.6.0`	direct
Packagist	laravel/serializable-closure	`2.0.13`	direct
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`3.10.0`	direct
Packagist	ondram/ci-detector	`4.2.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	direct
Packagist	seld/jsonlint	`1.12.1`	direct
Packagist	symfony/config	`7.4.10`	direct
Packagist	symfony/console	`7.4.14`	direct
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`7.4.10`	direct
Packagist	symfony/dotenv	`7.4.11`	direct
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`7.4.9`	direct
Packagist	symfony/expression-language	`7.4.8`	direct
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.4.11`	direct
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.4.14`	direct
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`7.4.8`	direct
Packagist	symfony/process	`7.4.13`	direct
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`7.4.12`	direct
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.4`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	brianium/paratest	`7.8.5`	indirect
Packagist	composer/ca-bundle	`1.5.13`	indirect
Packagist	composer/class-map-generator	`1.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	composer/composer	`2.10.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/metadata-minifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/spdx-licenses	`1.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	jean85/pretty-package-versions	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	justinrainbow/json-schema	`6.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	marc-mabe/php-enum	`4.7.2`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-cs-fixer/shim	`3.95.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/php-diff	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/phpspec	`8.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/prophecy	`1.26.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/prophecy-phpunit	`2.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`11.0.12`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`5.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`11.5.55`	indirect
Packagist	psr/cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	react/promise	`3.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`6.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`6.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`7.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`6.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`7.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`5.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`5.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	seld/phar-utils	`1.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	seld/signal-handler	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/cache	`7.4.12`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/cache-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.38.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php73	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php81	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-exporter	`7.4.9`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`2.4.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 110 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records