Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 06:33 UTC

pimeys / rust-postgres

Native PostgreSQL driver for the Rust programming language

RustApache-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Sep 2019forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

pimeys/rust-postgres holds a health index of 20 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (56/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (20/100). It was last updated 781 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

20
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

20
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 30 is calibrated to 24 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Julius de BruijnPersonal account
165 followers195 public repossince Nov 2008@twin-so

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iocodegenpoints to another repo — not scored0.3.0114,4887300 days ago—
crates.iopostgrespoints to another repo — not scored0.19.141,168,199110112 days agodatabasepostgrespostgresqlsql
crates.iopostgres-typespoints to another repo — not scored0.2.146,783,18221112 days agodatabasepostgrespostgresqlsql
crates.iotokio-postgrespoints to another repo — not scored0.7.186,365,21838112 days agoasyncdatabasepostgrespostgresqlsql
crates.iopostgres-derivepoints to another repo — not scored0.4.9727,92719112 days ago—
crates.iopostgres-opensslpoints to another repo — not scored0.5.3221,07010187 days ago—
crates.iopostgres-protocolpoints to another repo — not scored0.6.126,806,26629112 days ago—
crates.iopostgres-native-tlspoints to another repo — not scored0.5.31,103,81711187 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 781 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push781
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

48Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 60 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 3,463 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~33.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count60
latest_release_tagv0.11.12
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release3,463
mean_days_between_releases33.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

20At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars8
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

30At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

27At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 94 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled94
top_contributor_share0.918

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — 0/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16/25Owner reach — 165 followers of pimeys
25/25Track record — 195 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers165
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginpimeys
public_repos195
account_age_days6,528
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

36Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

1Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsCargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive-test/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive/Cargo.toml, postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml, postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml, postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml, postgres-types/Cargo.toml, postgres/Cargo.toml, tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:codegen@0.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

14Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.1/40Legible commit history — 26 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.265
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive-test/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive-test/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive/Cargo.toml, postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml, postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml, postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml, postgres-types/Cargo.toml, postgres/Cargo.toml, tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/119 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes53,050
source_files_sampled119
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
94contributors
0commits, last 12 months
781days since last push
60releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • crates package 'codegen' points at a different repository (https://gitlab.com/yovoslav/codegen.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'postgres' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'postgres-types' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'tokio-postgres' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'postgres-derive' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'postgres-openssl' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'postgres-protocol' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'postgres-native-tls' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/pimeys/rust-postgres: run: RepoClient.LocalPath: error during tarballHandler.setup: internal error: handler.httpClient.Do: Get "https://codeload.github.com/pimeys/rust-postgres/legacy.tar.gz/refs/heads/pgbouncer-mode": internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: error in HTTP: dial tcp: lookup codeload.github.com on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312023-032024-122026-09

Each point covers 4 days.

Direct dependencies 66
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iophf_codegen0.11codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.0codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iomarksman_escape0.1codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iolinked-hash-map0.5codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn1.0postgres-derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0postgres-derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0postgres-derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ionative-tls0.2postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.0postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-native-tls0.3postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-postgres0.7.0postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopenssl0.10postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.0postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-openssl0.6postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-postgres0.7.0postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.13postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iobyteorder1.0postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.0postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iofallible-iterator0.2postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.12postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-50.10postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2.0postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iostringprep0.1postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.0postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iofallible-iterator0.2postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostgres-protocol0.6.4postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostgres-derive0.4.2postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarray-init2postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iobit-vec-060.6postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono-040.4.16postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iocidr-020.2postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeui48-040.4postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeui48-11.0postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iogeo-types-060.6postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iogeo-types-0_70.7postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-11.0postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json-11.0postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid-080.8postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid-11.0postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iotime-020.2postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iotime-030.3postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmol_str-010.1.23postgres-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.0postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iofallible-iterator0.2postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-postgres0.7.7postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.0postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.0tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iobyteorder1.0tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iofallible-iterator0.2tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-channel0.3tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2.0tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iophf0.11tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostgres-protocol0.6.4tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostgres-types0.2.4tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket20.4tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.0tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 14 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioarray-init—direct
crates.ioasync-trait—direct
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.iobyteorder—direct
crates.iobytes—direct
crates.iofallible-iterator—direct
crates.iohmac—direct
crates.iolinked-hash-map—direct
crates.iolog—direct
crates.iomarksman_escape—direct
crates.iomd-5—direct
crates.iomemchr—direct
crates.ionative-tls—direct
crates.ioopenssl—direct
crates.ioparking_lot—direct
crates.iopercent-encoding—direct
crates.iophf—direct
crates.iophf_codegen—direct
crates.iopin-project-lite—direct
crates.iopostgres-derive—direct
crates.iopostgres-protocol—direct
crates.iopostgres-types—direct
crates.ioproc-macro2—direct
crates.ioquote—direct
crates.iorand—direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.iosha2—direct
crates.iosocket2—direct
crates.iostringprep—direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotokio-openssl—direct
crates.iotokio-postgres—direct
crates.iotokio-util—direct
crates.iobit-vec—indirect
crates.iochrono—indirect
crates.iocidr—indirect
crates.iocriterion—indirect
crates.ioenv_logger—indirect
crates.ioeui48—indirect
crates.iofutures—indirect
crates.iogeo-types—indirect
crates.iopostgres—indirect
crates.ioserde—indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.iotime—indirect
crates.iotrybuild—indirect
crates.iouuid—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:codegen@0.3.0 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with pimeys/rust-postgres. Read them side by side →

100scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional100modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdkThe official Rust SDK for the Model Context ProtocolExceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.