Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 16:42 UTC

plengauer / opentelemetry-bash

ShellApache-2.0★ 162 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

plengauer/opentelemetry-bash holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (57/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Philipp LengauerPersonal account
21 followers25 public repossince Feb 2022Dynatrace

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,477 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,477
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~10.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.58.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases10.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.8/60Stars162 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars162
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 60% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.604
How it's scored
40.8/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
27/30PR acceptance2,942/3,263 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 27/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs2,942
open_issues14
closed_issues464
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.971
closed_unmerged_prs321
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9.7/25Owner reach21 followers of plengauer
19.1/25Track record25 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginplengauer
public_repos25
account_age_days1,600
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

57Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows32 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbash, opentelemetry, script, shell, agent, injection, instrumentation, logs, metrics, propagation, traces, github-actions
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 27/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.2

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,382
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeShell without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/24 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageShell
largest_source_bytes27,751
source_files_sampled24
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesdemos, example
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, example
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

162GitHub stars
9contributors
1,477commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
14open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 16:41 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 27/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 183

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 183 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenio.opentelemetry.javaagent:opentelemetry-javaagent2.29.0indirect
Mavennet.bytebuddy:byte-buddy1.18.11-jdk5indirect
npm@actions/artifact6.2.1indirect
npm@actions/cache6.1.0indirect
npm@actions/core3.0.1indirect
npm@actions/exec3.0.0indirect
npm@actions/github9.1.1indirect
npm@actions/glob0.6.1indirect
npm@actions/http-client3.0.2indirect
npm@actions/http-client4.0.1indirect
npm@actions/io3.0.2indirect
npm@azure/abort-controller2.1.2indirect
npm@azure/core-auth1.10.1indirect
npm@azure/core-client1.10.2indirect
npm@azure/core-http-compat2.4.0indirect
npm@azure/core-lro2.7.2indirect
npm@azure/core-paging1.6.2indirect
npm@azure/core-rest-pipeline1.24.0indirect
npm@azure/core-tracing1.3.1indirect
npm@azure/core-util1.13.1indirect
npm@azure/core-xml1.5.1indirect
npm@azure/logger1.3.0indirect
npm@azure/storage-blob12.32.0indirect
npm@azure/storage-common12.4.0indirect
npm@bufbuild/protobuf2.12.0indirect
npm@bufbuild/protoplugin2.12.0indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@nodable/entities2.2.0indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-request-log6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-retry8.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.10indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/api1.9.1indirect
npm@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node0.78.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resource-detector-alibaba-cloud0.35.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resource-detector-aws2.20.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resource-detector-azure0.28.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resource-detector-container0.8.11indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resource-detector-gcp0.55.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resource-detector-github0.32.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/resources2.9.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-node0.220.0indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@protobuf-ts/plugin2.11.1indirect
npm@protobuf-ts/protoc2.11.1indirect
npm@protobuf-ts/runtime2.11.1indirect
npm@protobuf-ts/runtime-rpc2.11.1indirect
npm@traceloop/node-server-sdk0.27.0indirect
npm@typescript/vfs1.6.4indirect
npm@typespec/ts-http-runtime0.3.6indirect
npmabort-controller3.0.0indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmanynum1.0.0indirect
npmarchiver7.0.1indirect
npmarchiver-utils5.0.2indirect
npmasync3.2.6indirect
npmb4a1.8.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbare-events2.9.1indirect
npmbare-fs4.7.2indirect
npmbare-os3.9.1indirect
npmbare-path3.0.1indirect
npmbare-stream2.13.3indirect
npmbare-url2.4.5indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmbinary0.3.0indirect
npmbottleneck2.19.5indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.15indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.1indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmbuffer-crc321.0.0indirect
npmbuffers0.1.1indirect
npmchainsaw0.1.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcompress-commons6.0.2indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmcrc-321.2.2indirect
npmcrc32-stream6.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmevent-target-shim5.0.1indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmevents-universal1.0.1indirect
npmfast-fifo1.3.2indirect
npmfast-xml-builder1.2.0indirect
npmfast-xml-parser5.8.0indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-stream2.0.1indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjson-with-bigint3.5.8indirect
npmjwt-decode4.0.0indirect
npmlazystream1.0.1indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminimatch5.1.9indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath-expression-matcher1.5.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.8indirect
npmreadable-stream4.7.0indirect
npmreaddir-glob1.1.3indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.4indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstreamx2.28.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrnum2.4.0indirect
npmtar-stream3.2.0indirect
npmteex1.0.1indirect
npmtext-decoder1.2.7indirect
npmtraverse0.3.9indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtunnel0.0.6indirect
npmtypescript3.9.10indirect
npmtypescript5.4.5indirect
npmundici6.26.0indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
npmunzip-stream0.3.4indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmxml-naming0.1.0indirect
npmzip-stream6.0.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-distro0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.64b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-resource-detector-azure0.1.5indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-resourcedetector-docker0.4.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-resourcedetector-gcp1.12.0a0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-resourcedetector-kubernetes0.3.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk-extension-aws2.1.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPItraceloop-sdk0.62.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.