Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 19:39 UTC

postcss / autoprefixer

Parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to rules by Can I Use

JavaScript · CSSMIT★ 22,251 stars⑂ 1,291 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

postcss/autoprefixer holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

PostCSSOrganization

428 followers57 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	autoprefixer	10.5.4	262,488,365	256	19 days ago	autoprefixer css postcss postcss-plugin prefix

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 12 days ago
6.2/36	Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
15.5/18	Commit volume — 52 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	52
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	12
active_weeks_last_year	9

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 19 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~23.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	10.5.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	19
mean_days_between_releases	23.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

89Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

99Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 22,251 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,291 forks
14.2/15	Watchers — 360 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,291
stars	22,251
watchers	360
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 262,488,365 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	autoprefixer
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	262,488,365
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	100
top_contributor_share	0.89

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent

How it's scored

40.7/42	Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
24.4/30	PR acceptance — 286/351 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	286
open_issues	37
closed_issues	1,132
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.968
closed_unmerged_prs	65
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
18.9/25	Owner reach — 428 followers of postcss
24.8/25	Track record — 57 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	428
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	postcss
public_repos	57
account_age_days	4,389

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 19 days ago
20/20	Version history — 256 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	autoprefixer
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	19

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://twitter.com/autoprefixer
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	css, postcss-plugins, prefixer
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://twitter.com/autoprefixer
docs_site	https://twitter.com/autoprefixer
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 contributor organization profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	75
security_posture_after_multiplier	40
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	54

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	10
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:autoprefixer@10.5.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 10 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

8Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
8/40	Legible commit history — 15 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.15
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/97 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	36,391
source_files_sampled	97
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

22,251GitHub stars

100contributors

52commits, last 12 months

12days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

37open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,291 ⇿

0Stars

1,291Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 1Minor 13Patch 86

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10

5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 19:39 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 35 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	25 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	browserslist	`^4.28.6`	package.json
npm	caniuse-lite	`^1.0.30001806`	package.json
npm	fraction.js	`^5.3.4`	package.json
npm	picocolors	`^1.1.1`	package.json
npm	postcss-value-parser	`^4.2.0`	package.json

All dependencies 167

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 162 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	browserslist	`4.28.6`	direct
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001806`	direct
npm	fraction.js	`5.3.4`	direct
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	direct
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	direct
npm	@bcoe/v8-coverage	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@istanbuljs/schema	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@logux/oxc-configs	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-arm64	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/darwin-x64	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-arm64	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/linux-x64	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-arm64	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint-tsgolint/win32-x64	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-android-arm64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-darwin-x64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/esbuild	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/file	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/preset-small-lib	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/istanbul-lib-coverage	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	actions-up	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-colors	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.10.43`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.7`	indirect
npm	bytes-iec	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	c8	`11.0.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	diff	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.392`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	enquirer	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prefer-let	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	kleur	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.5.2`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	mri	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`5.1.16`	indirect
npm	nanospinner	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	nanospy	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.51`	indirect
npm	oxlint	`1.74.0`	indirect
npm	oxlint-tsgolint	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.19`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	requireindex	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sade	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	size-limit	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	test-exclude	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	uvu	`0.5.6`	indirect
npm	v8-to-istanbul	`9.3.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.3`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:autoprefixer@10.5.4 pulls in 10 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records