Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-04 08:40 UTC

ppfeufer / aa-srp

SRP Module for Alliance Auth

PythonGPL-3.0★ 2 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Nov 2020View on GitHub ↗

ppfeufer/aa-srp holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Peter PfeuferPersonal account

33 followers78 public repossince Dec 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	aa-srp	5.3.0	118,529	137	0 days ago	allianceauth eveonline ship-replacement

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

91Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27/36	Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 395 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	395
human_commit_share	0.8
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	39

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~23 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v5.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	23

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 2 stars
7.5/25	Forks — 9 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	9
stars	2
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

85Excellent

How it's scored

67.7/80	Monthly downloads — 118,529 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	aa-srp
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	118,529
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.986

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

36.8/42	Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
29/30	PR acceptance — 488/504 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	488
open_issues	4
closed_issues	28
prs_merged_7d	2
prs_decided_7d	2
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	8
issue_closed_ratio	0.875
closed_unmerged_prs	16
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11/25	Owner reach — 33 followers of ppfeufer
25/25	Track record — 78 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	33
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	ppfeufer
public_repos	78
account_age_days	5,048

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 137 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	aa-srp
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .flake8, .pylintrc, eslint.config.js, tox.ini
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/ppfeufer/aa-srp/blob/master/README.md
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	allianceauth, ship-replacement, django
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://github.com/ppfeufer/aa-srp/blob/master/README.md
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	5.7

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	212
unassessed_packages	3
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 212 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 62 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.775
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .flake8, .pylintrc, eslint.config.js, tox.ini
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.17

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/83 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	219,767
source_files_sampled	83
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

2GitHub stars

3contributors

395commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

4open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package '@ppfeufer/aa-srp' from its registry
deps.dev does not index pypi:aa-srp@5.3.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿

0Stars

9Forks

91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 32Patch 51

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10

5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-04 08:40 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	allianceauth	`>=5.5,<6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	django-eveonline-sde	`>=0.2`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 215

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 213 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	allianceauth	`—`	direct
PyPI	django-eveonline-sde	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@cacheable/memory	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	@cacheable/utils	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/media-query-list-parser	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/selector-resolve-nested	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@csstools/selector-specificity	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.10.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.11`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@keyv/bigmap	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	@keyv/serialize	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-android-arm64	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm64	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x64	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-arm64	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-x64	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	@sindresorhus/merge-streams	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@stylistic/eslint-plugin	`5.10.0`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`8.70.1`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	astral-regex	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.12`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	cacheable	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	colord	`2.10.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	css-functions-list	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	env-paths	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.10.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.7`	indirect
npm	fastest-levenshtein	`1.0.16`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.3`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`11.1.5`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`6.1.23`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.4`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	global-modules	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	global-prefix	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.12.0`	indirect
npm	globby	`16.2.4`	indirect
npm	globjoin	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	hashery	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	hookified	`1.15.1`	indirect
npm	hookified	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	html-tags	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.8`	indirect
npm	immutable	`5.1.9`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	import-meta-resolve	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`5.6.0`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.truncate	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	mathml-tag-names	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.27.1`	indirect
npm	meow	`14.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	node-addon-api	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	normalize-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.28`	indirect
npm	postcss-safe-parser	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`7.1.6`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	qified	`0.10.1`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sass	`1.104.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	slash	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`8.2.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	stylelint	`17.15.0`	indirect
npm	stylelint-config-recommended	`18.0.0`	indirect
npm	stylelint-config-standard	`40.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`10.2.2`	indirect
npm	supports-hyperlinks	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	svg-tags	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	table	`6.9.0`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.51.2`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	unicorn-magic	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	which	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	write-file-atomic	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	py-cord	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 212 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
braces	`3.0.3`	indirect	high	1	—
fast-uri	`3.1.7`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.1.5`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records