Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-29 21:42 UTC

projectblacklight / spotlight

Spotlight enables librarians, curators, and others who are responsible for digital collections to create attractive, feature-rich websites that highlight these collections.

Ruby · JavaScript · HTMLCustom license★ 168 stars⑂ 63 forkssince Nov 2013View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

#solr #rails #ruby #discovery-interface #rails-application #rails-engine #exhibit

projectblacklight/spotlight holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Project BlacklightOrganization

52 followers34 public repossince Aug 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	spotlight-frontend	5.3.1	291	35	0 days ago
RubyGems	blacklight-spotlight	5.3.1	-	187	0 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.1/36	Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 151 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	151
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	29

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~61.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v5.3.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	61.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

60Moderate

How it's scored

36.1/60	Stars — 168 stars
14.9/25	Forks — 63 forks
8.5/15	Watchers — 35 watchers

Inputs used

forks	63
stars	168
watchers	35
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

71Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	badge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

41Weak

How it's scored

32.9/80	Monthly downloads — 291 downloads/month across npm, rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	spotlight-frontend, blacklight-spotlight
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm, rubygems
total_downloads	420,184
monthly_downloads	291
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

60Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 38 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 46 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	38
top_contributor_share	0.481

Issue & PR responsiveness

89Excellent

How it's scored

35.4/42	Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 2,087/2,327 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	2,087
open_issues	213
closed_issues	1,154
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	5
prs_merged_30d	7
prs_decided_30d	7
issue_closed_ratio	0.844
closed_unmerged_prs	240
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12.4/25	Owner reach — 52 followers of projectblacklight
23.2/25	Track record — 34 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	52
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	projectblacklight
public_repos	34
account_age_days	6,241

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 187 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	spotlight-frontend, blacklight-spotlight
ecosystems	npm, rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rubocop.yml, eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/blacklight-spotlight/5.3.1
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	solr, rails, ruby, discovery-interface, rails-application, rails-engine, exhibit
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/blacklight-spotlight/5.3.1
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 46 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	148
unassessed_packages	46
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 148 resolved dependencies against OSV. 46 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40	Legible commit history — 49 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.5
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml, eslint.config.js
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/695 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	255,641
source_files_sampled	695
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

168GitHub stars

38contributors

151commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

2bus factor

213open issues

npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index npm:spotlight-frontend@5.3.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 63 ⇿

0Stars

63Forks

97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 4Minor 39Patch 39

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10

6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-29 21:42 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8	CI-Tests	13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 46 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	26 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	rails	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rails	`—`	Gemfile
npm	blacklight-frontend	`^8.4.0`	package.json
npm	jquery	`>=3.7.1`	package.json
npm	jquery-serializejson	`^3.2.1`	package.json
npm	leaflet	`^1.9.4`	package.json
npm	leaflet-iiif	`^3.0.0`	package.json
npm	openseadragon-rails	`^1.0.1`	package.json
npm	sir-trevor	`^0.8.2`	package.json
npm	sortablejs	`^1.15.3`	package.json

All dependencies 194

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	blacklight-frontend	`8.4.0`	direct
npm	jquery	`3.7.1`	direct
npm	jquery-serializejson	`3.2.1`	direct
npm	leaflet	`1.9.4`	direct
npm	leaflet-iiif	`3.0.0`	direct
npm	openseadragon-rails	`1.0.17`	direct
npm	sir-trevor	`0.8.2`	direct
npm	sortablejs	`1.15.3`	direct
RubyGems	rails	`—`	direct
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@popperjs/core	`2.11.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-commonjs	`26.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/pluginutils	`5.1.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.17.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	bootstrap	`5.3.3`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.7`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commondir	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	es5-shim	`4.6.7`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.7.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-reference	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.11`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.8`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	openseadragon	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.8.4`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	rollup-plugin-includepaths	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	svg4everybody	`2.1.9`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	activejob-status	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	acts-as-taggable-on	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	axe-core-rspec	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	blacklight	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	blacklight-gallery	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	bootstrap_form	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	cancancan	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	capybara	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	carrierwave	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	csv	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	devise	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	devise_invitable	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	engine_cart	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	factory_bot	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday-follow_redirects	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	friendly_id	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	google-analytics-data	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n-active_record	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n-tasks	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	iiif-presentation	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	iiif_manifest	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	mini_magick	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	nokogiri	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	openseadragon	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	paper_trail	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rails-controller-testing	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	redcarpet	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	riiif	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-activemodel-mocks	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-collection_matchers	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-its	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-rails	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-capybara	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rails	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	selenium-webdriver	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	sitemap_generator	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	solr_wrapper	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	sqlite3	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	view_component	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	webmock	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 148 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 46 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`5.0.7`	indirect	high	2	`5.0.9`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records