Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 15:16 UTC

puikinsh / CoolAdmin

Free Bootstrap 5 based admin dashboard template - open source and licensed under MIT license

HTML · SCSS · CSSMIT★ 1,138 stars⑂ 658 forkssince May 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

puikinsh/CoolAdmin holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Aigars SilkalnsPersonal account
2,411 followers35 public repossince Feb 2013Divilab

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 9 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
10.6/18Commit volume — 14 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year14
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~89.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv3.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases89.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.6/60Stars — 1,138 stars
23.5/25Forks — 658 forks
9.9/15Watchers — 62 watchers
Inputs used
forks658
stars1,138
watchers62
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
20.4/80Monthly downloads — 33 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescooladmin
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads33
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.927
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
18/30PR acceptance — 6/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues0
closed_issues25
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24.3/25Owner reach — 2,411 followers of puikinsh
23.3/25Track record — 35 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,411
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginpuikinsh
public_repos35
account_age_days5,010
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 80 days ago
4/20Version history — 1 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescooladmin
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish80

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://cooladmin.colorlib.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsadmin, admin-dashboard, admin-panel, admin-template, bootstrap5, admin-dashboard-template, admin-dashboard-ui, css, dashboard, dashboard-templates, dashboards, html, admin-ui, colorlib
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://cooladmin.colorlib.com
docs_sitehttps://cooladmin.colorlib.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespackage-lock.json
manifestspackage.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages150
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://cooladmin.colorlib.com/llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 30 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://cooladmin.colorlib.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,938
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 22 of the last 60 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.367
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes52,979
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,138GitHub stars
4contributors
14commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/puikinsh/CoolAdmin: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-10-22T15:16:25Z. Please include `B89E:3A229:8BAD7AD:CAB53F4:6ADA28C6` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 658 ⇿
0Stars
658Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625750655112018-052022-072026-09
Major 1Minor 3Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.3indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@full-ui/headless-calendar7.1.2indirect
npm@fullcalendar/core7.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.153.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-ia322.5.6indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.5.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.13indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npmacorn7.4.1indirect
npmacorn8.19.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmasap2.0.6indirect
npmassert-never1.4.0indirect
npmbabel-walk3.0.0-canary-5indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmcharacter-parser2.2.0indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcliui9.0.1indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmconcurrently10.0.6indirect
npmconstantinople4.0.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdoctypes1.1.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfullcalendar7.1.2indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.3indirect
npmimmutable5.1.9indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.2indirect
npmis-expression4.0.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-promise2.2.2indirect
npmis-regex1.2.1indirect
npmjs-stringify1.0.2indirect
npmjstransformer1.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.20indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.30indirect
npmpreact10.29.8indirect
npmpromise7.3.1indirect
npmpug3.0.4indirect
npmpug-attrs3.0.0indirect
npmpug-code-gen3.0.4indirect
npmpug-error2.1.0indirect
npmpug-filters4.0.0indirect
npmpug-lexer5.0.1indirect
npmpug-linker4.0.0indirect
npmpug-load3.0.0indirect
npmpug-parser6.0.0indirect
npmpug-runtime3.0.1indirect
npmpug-strip-comments2.0.0indirect
npmpug-walk2.0.0indirect
npmreaddirp5.0.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.12indirect
npmrolldown1.2.13indirect
npmrxjs7.8.2indirect
npmsass1.105.1indirect
npmshell-quote1.12.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.2indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color10.2.2indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtemporal-polyfill1.0.5indirect
npmtemporal-spec1.0.1indirect
npmtemporal-utils1.0.3indirect
npmterser5.51.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtoken-stream1.0.0indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmvite8.3.4indirect
npmvoid-elements3.1.0indirect
npmwith7.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs18.0.0indirect
npmyargs-parser22.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.