Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 19:08 UTC

pypa / pipenv

Python Development Workflow for Humans.

Python · HTMLMIT★ 25,033 stars⑂ 1,880 forkssince Jan 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#pip#python#packaging#virtualenv#pipfile

pypa/pipenv holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Security (65/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

98
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

98
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 86 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Python Packaging AuthorityOrganization · verified domain
2,421 followers59 public repossince Mar 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIpipenv2026.8.026,484,86442126 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

77Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 22 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 662 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year662
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 26 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2026.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release26
mean_days_between_releases16.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

97Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

99Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 25,033 stars
25/25Forks — 1,880 forks
14.2/15Watchers — 352 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,880
stars25,033
watchers352
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 26,484,864 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespipenv
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads26,484,864
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 73 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.303

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 1,812/2,220 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,812
open_issues12
closed_issues4,369
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.997
closed_unmerged_prs408
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

99Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
24.3/25Owner reach — 2,421 followers of pypa
24.9/25Track record — 59 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,421
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginpypa
public_repos59
account_age_days5,677

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 26 days ago
20/20Version history — 421 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespipenv
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish26

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pipenv.pypa.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspip, python, packaging, virtualenv, pipfile
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://pipenv.pypa.io
docs_sitehttps://pipenv.pypa.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
2.2/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 73 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pipenv@2026.8.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 71 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.755
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docker/Makefile, docs/Makefile, pipenv/vendor/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/cachecontrol/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/certifi/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/distro/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/idna/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/packaging/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/platformdirs/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/requests/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/rich/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/tomli/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/tomli_w/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/truststore/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/urllib3/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/dotenv/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/packaging/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/pipdeptree/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/tomlkit/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 55 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesPipfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docker/Makefile, docs/Makefile, pipenv/vendor/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/cachecontrol/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/certifi/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/distro/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/idna/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/packaging/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/platformdirs/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/requests/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/rich/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/tomli/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/tomli_w/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/truststore/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/urllib3/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/dotenv/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/packaging/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/pipdeptree/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/tomlkit/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.55
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/cachecontrol/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/certifi/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/distro/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/idna/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/packaging/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/platformdirs/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/pyproject_hooks/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/requests/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/rich/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/tomli/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/tomli_w/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/truststore/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/_vendor/urllib3/py.typed, pipenv/patched/pip/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/dotenv/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/packaging/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/pipdeptree/py.typed, pipenv/vendor/tomlkit/py.typed)
53.7/55Manageable file sizes — 13/570 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes2,266,996
source_files_sampled570
oversized_source_files13

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

25,033GitHub stars
97contributors
662commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
12open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'pipenv' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for pipenv carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,880 ⇿
0Stars
1,880Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

5001,0001,5002,0001,880142019-022022-112026-09
Major 3Minor 12Patch 84

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 19:07 UTC

3Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 73 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIcertifi—pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=22pyproject.toml
PyPIsetuptools>=67pyproject.toml
PyPIvirtualenv>=20.26.6pyproject.toml
All dependencies 174

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcertifi—direct
PyPIcertifi2018.1.18direct
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25direct
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22direct
PyPIpackaging—direct
PyPIpackaging26.0direct
PyPIpackaging26.2direct
PyPIsetuptools—direct
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0direct
PyPIvirtualenv—direct
PyPIvirtualenv21.2.0direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIargcomplete—indirect
PyPIargparse1.4.0indirect
PyPIarpeggio2.0.3indirect
PyPIatomicwrites1.4.1indirect
PyPIattrs17.4.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIblinker1.4indirect
PyPIbottle0.13.4indirect
PyPIbrotlipy0.7.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.0indirect
PyPIcffi1.11.5indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIchardet3.0.4indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.6indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick6.7indirect
PyPIclick8.0.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.3.9indirect
PyPIcontextlib20.5.5indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcrayons0.1.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdateparser0.7.0indirect
PyPIdecorator4.2.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.1.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.2indirect
PyPIflake83.9.2indirect
PyPIflask0.12.2indirect
PyPIflask-cache0.13.1indirect
PyPIflask-common0.2.0indirect
PyPIflask-limiter1.0.1indirect
PyPIfuncsigs1.0.2indirect
PyPIgreenlet0.4.13indirect
PyPIgunicorn19.7.1indirect
PyPIgunicorn26.1.0indirect
PyPIhttpbin0.6.2indirect
PyPIhumanize0.5.1indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.18indirect
PyPIidna—indirect
PyPIidna2.6indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIimagesize—indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.1indirect
PyPIitsdangerous0.24indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja2—indirect
PyPIjinja22.10indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlegacy-cgi2.6.4indirect
PyPIlimits1.3indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py2.1.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe—indirect
PyPImarkupsafe1.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImaya0.3.4indirect
PyPImccabe0.6.1indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.5.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImeinheld0.6.1indirect
PyPImock5.2.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser—indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.0.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIparse1.21.1indirect
PyPIparver0.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpendulum1.4.2indirect
PyPIpip26.2indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.4.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy0.6.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit2.21.0indirect
PyPIpy1.5.2indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.7.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.18indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpyenchant3.3.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes2.3.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpypiserver2.4.1indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest3.4.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov4.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures16.1indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.1.3indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz—indirect
PyPIpytz2018.3indirect
PyPIpytz2026.1.post1indirect
PyPIpytzdata2018.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIraven6.6.0indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIregex2018.2.21indirect
PyPIrequests—indirect
PyPIrequests2.18.4indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt0.8.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.15.35indirect
PyPIsafety—indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsemver3.0.4indirect
PyPIsix1.11.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer—indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-click4.4.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-spelling—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-spelling7.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-websupport—indirect
PyPIstdeb0.11.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItowncrier25.8.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.19.6indirect
PyPItwine1.9.1indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItzlocal1.5.1indirect
PyPIuc-micro-py2.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib3—indirect
PyPIurllib31.22indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv-clone—indirect
PyPIwaitress3.0.2indirect
PyPIwerkzeug0.14.1indirect
PyPIwhitenoise3.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pipenv@2026.8.0 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with pypa/pipenv. Read them side by side →

98pypa/pipThe Python package installerExceptional99pypa/cibuildwheel🎡 Build Python wheels for all the platforms with minimal configuration. Exceptional99apify/crawlee-pythonCrawlee—A web scraping and browser automation library for Python to build reliable crawlers. Extract data for AI, LLMs, RAG, or GPTs. Download HTML, PDF, JPG, PNG, and other files from websites. Works with Parsel, BeautifulSoup, Playwright, and raw HTTP. Both headful and headless mode. With proxy rotation.Exceptional98pypa/pipxInstall and Run Python Applications in Isolated EnvironmentsExceptional97tox-dev/pipdeptreeA command line utility to display dependency tree of the installed Python packagesExceptional97pyinstaller/pyinstallerFreeze (package) Python programs into stand-alone executablesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.