Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 10:44 UTC

pytest-dev / pytest-asyncio

Asyncio support for pytest

PythonApache-2.0★ 1,663 stars⑂ 207 forkssince Apr 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined
#asyncio#pytest-plugin#python#testing

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (69/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

pytest-devOrganization
818 followers78 public repossince Sep 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0233,930,93476113 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 279 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year279
human_commit_share0.23
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year50

Release discipline

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 56 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 113 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~40.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count56
latest_release_tagv1.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release113
mean_days_between_releases40.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent
How it's scored
52.2/60Stars — 1,663 stars
19.3/25Forks — 207 forks
8.5/15Watchers — 35 watchers
Inputs used
forks207
stars1,663
watchers35
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 233,930,934 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespytest-asyncio
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads233,930,934
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 56% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 74 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled74
top_contributor_share0.556

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
37.9/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance — 970/1,134 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs970
open_issues38
closed_issues354
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.903
closed_unmerged_prs164
first_time_authors_30d6
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d7

Ownership & stewardship

76Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
20.9/25Owner reach — 818 followers of pytest-dev
25/25Track record — 78 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers818
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpytest-dev
public_repos78
account_age_days4,374

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 113 days ago
20/20Version history — 76 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespytest-asyncio
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish113

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pytest-asyncio.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsasyncio, pytest-plugin, python, testing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pytest-asyncio.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://pytest-asyncio.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

79Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages5
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pytest-asyncio@1.4.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 5 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

39Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.4/40Legible commit history — 17 of 23 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.739
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

86Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — pytest_asyncio/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 77 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspytest_asyncio/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.77

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (pytest_asyncio/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/63 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes38,225
source_files_sampled63
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,663GitHub stars
74contributors
279commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
56releases
1bus factor
38open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 207 ⇿
0Stars
207Forks
56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024020272015-042020-122026-09
Major 1Minor 14Patch 22

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 10:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner>=1.1,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest>=8.4,<10pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.12pyproject.toml
All dependencies 88

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0direct
PyPIpytest—direct
PyPIpytest9.1.1direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.6.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIcheck-wheel-contents0.6.3indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage—indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.31.2indirect
PyPIhypothesis—indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.167.1indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.5.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInodejs-wheel-binaries24.16.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.411indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.4indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm—indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme—indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs—indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.6.1indirect
PyPIwheel-filename1.4.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pytest-asyncio@1.4.0 pulls in 5 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio. Read them side by side →

99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99home-assistant/core:house_with_garden: Open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first.Exceptional99ansible/moleculeAn ansible-native testing framework for collections, playbooks, and roles with configurable workflows for testing any system or serviceExceptional99ag2ai/faststreamAsynchronous Python framework for event-driven services. A thin client for Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS, Redis and MQTT with full access to native broker features, plus AsyncAPI docs, in-memory tests and observability out of the box.Exceptional98pytest-dev/pytestThe pytest framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testingExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.