Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 09:05 UTC

qxoticai / qxotic

AI sovereignty for the world's most trusted runtime.

JavaApache-2.0★ 175 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

qxoticai/qxotic holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (51/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Quixotic AIOrganization
13 followers5 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavencom.qxotic:gguf0.3.1-311 days ago
Mavencom.qxotic:json0.2.0-234 days ago
Mavencom.qxotic:safetensors0.3.1-311 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,213 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,213
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 34 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.2.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release34
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.3/60Stars — 175 stars
9.6/25Forks — 15 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars175
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
18/42Issue resolution — 43% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 2/2 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues4
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.429
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of qxoticai
7.1/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginqxoticai
public_repos5
account_age_days256
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescom.qxotic:gguf, com.qxotic:json, com.qxotic:safetensors
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://qxotic.ai
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgraalvm, hip, java, llama, llm, llm-inference, metal, opencl, cuda, ai, embeddings, rerank, text-generation, tts, asr
has_wikino
homepagehttps://qxotic.ai
docs_sitehttps://qxotic.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — gguf/AGENTS.md, gguf/CLAUDE.md, jota/AGENTS.md, jota/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.8/40Legible commit history — 24 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.24
agent_instruction_filesgguf/AGENTS.md, gguf/CLAUDE.md, jota/AGENTS.md, jota/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,587
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, jinfer/Makefile, jinfer/jinfer-bench/Makefile, jinfer/jinfer-cli/Makefile, jinfer/jinfer-tts/Makefile, jota/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, jinfer/Makefile, jinfer/jinfer-bench/Makefile, jinfer/jinfer-cli/Makefile, jinfer/jinfer-tts/Makefile, jota/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsexamples/pom.xml, gguf/pom.xml, jam/graalvm-annotations/pom.xml, jam/jam-core/pom.xml, jam/jam-native/pom.xml, jam/jam-scalar/pom.xml, jam/jam-vector/pom.xml, jam/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-bailingmoe3/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-bench/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-bom/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-cache/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-chat/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-cli/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-codecs/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-core/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-example-judge-advisor/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-example-local-rag/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-gemma4/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-gptoss/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-hub/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-inflect2/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-jinja/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-kernels/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-kokoro/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-laguna/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-langchain4j/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-lfm2/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-llama/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-maple/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-mellum/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-models-all/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-nemotronh/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-parakeet/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-qwen3/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-qwen35/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-server/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-spring-ai-autoconfigure/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-spring-ai-spring-boot-starter/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-spring-ai/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-testkit/pom.xml, jinfer/jinfer-tts/pom.xml, jinfer/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-c/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-cuda/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-hip/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-metal/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-mojo/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-opencl/pom.xml, jota/jota-backend-panama/pom.xml, jota/jota-core/pom.xml, jota/jota-memory/pom.xml, jota/jota-tensor/pom.xml, jota/pom.xml, json/benchmarks/pom.xml, json/pom.xml, pom.xml, safetensors/pom.xml, toknroll/pom.xml, toknroll/toknroll-benchmarks/pom.xml, toknroll/toknroll-core/pom.xml, toknroll/toknroll-gguf/pom.xml, toknroll/toknroll-hf/pom.xml, toknroll/toknroll-incubator/pom.xml, toknroll/toknroll-testkit/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 17/1,752 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes156,738
source_files_sampled1,752
oversized_source_files17
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — demos, example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, example, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

175GitHub stars
3contributors
2,213commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
4open issues
Maven, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿
0Stars
15Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151522026-092026-092026-10
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 09:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 80
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-core${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-codecs${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-kernels${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-cache${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-lfm2${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-qwen3${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-qwen35${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-bailingmoe3${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-laguna${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-mellum${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-gemma4${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-gptoss${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-nemotronh${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-parakeet${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-llama${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-inflect2${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-kokoro${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-chat${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-server${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-bench${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-hub${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-testkit${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-jinja${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-langchain4j${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-spring-ai${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-spring-ai-autoconfigure${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-spring-ai-spring-boot-starter${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jinfer-models-all${jinfer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-observation${micrometer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-observation-test${micrometer.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-core${reactor.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenorg.reactivestreams:reactive-streams${reactive-streams.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-core${spring-framework.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenorg.assertj:assertj-core${assertj.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core${mockito.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter${mockito.version}jinfer/pom.xml
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-core${jackson-core.version}jinfer/pom.xml
npm@docusaurus/core3.10.1package.json
npm@docusaurus/faster3.10.1package.json
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic3.10.1package.json
npm@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local^0.55.1package.json
npm@mdx-js/react^3.0.0package.json
npmprism-react-renderer^2.3.0package.json
npmreact^19.0.0package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0package.json
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api${slf4j.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple${slf4j.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom${junit.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.opentest4j:opentest4j${opentest4j.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.knuddels:jtokkit${jtokkit.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind${jackson-databind.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-compress${commons-compress.version}pom.xml
Mavencommons-io:commons-io${commons-io.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:gguf${gguf.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:safetensors${safetensors.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:json${json.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-core${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-memory${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-tensor${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-panama${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-c${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-hip${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-cuda${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-mojo${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-metal${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jota-backend-opencl${jota.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-core${toknroll.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-incubator${toknroll.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-gguf${toknroll.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-hf${toknroll.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jam-core${jam.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jam-native${jam.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jam-scalar${jam.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:jam-vector${jam.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:json—safetensors/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-core${toknroll.version}toknroll/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-gguf${toknroll.version}toknroll/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-hf${toknroll.version}toknroll/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-testkit${toknroll.version}toknroll/pom.xml
Mavencom.qxotic:toknroll-incubator${toknroll.version}toknroll/pom.xml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.