Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 11:32 UTC

raeq / disarm

Canonicalize and neutralize adversarial Unicode — homoglyph/bidi/zalgo/invisibles — before it reaches your classifiers, indexes, and identifiers

Python · RustMIT★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#abjad#cjk#confusables#grapheme#homoglyphs#normalization#pinyin#romanization#slugify#tr39#unidecode#zalgo#bidi#transliteration#transliteration-cyrillic#nlp-machine-learning

raeq/disarm holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Richard QuinnPersonal account
4 followers3 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iodisarm0.11.17043 days agoconfusablehomoglyphnormalizationtransliterationunicode-securityencodingtext-processinginternationalization
PyPIdisarm0.11.1-63 days agounicode-securityhomoglyphconfusabletr39idnanti-spoofingtext-sanitizationadversarialcanonicalizationbidizalgonormalizationsecuritytransliterationslugslugifyunidecoderomanizationfilenamesanitizegraphemeencodingcjkpinyin

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 724 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year724
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 21 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tagv0.11.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

31At Risk
How it's scored
24.7/80Monthly downloads — 70 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdisarm, disarm
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads210
monthly_downloads70
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.973

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
40.3/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
27.4/30PR acceptance — 278/304 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs278
open_issues9
closed_issues213
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.959
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

39Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of raeq
16.4/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginraeq
public_repos3
account_age_days4,293
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdisarm, disarm
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 15 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml, biome.json
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.disarm.dev/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 16 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsabjad, cjk, confusables, grapheme, homoglyphs, normalization, pinyin, romanization, slugify, tr39, unidecode, zalgo, bidi, transliteration, transliteration-cyrillic, nlp-machine-learning
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.disarm.dev/
docs_sitehttps://www.disarm.dev/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

68Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
4/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,634
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml, biome.json
11/11Static type checking — bindings/node/tsconfig.json, packaging/translit-rs-deprecation/translit/py.typed, python/disarm/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsbindings/node/tsconfig.json, packaging/translit-rs-deprecation/translit/py.typed, python/disarm/py.typed
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (bindings/node/tsconfig.json, packaging/translit-rs-deprecation/translit/py.typed, python/disarm/py.typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 5/245 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes122,951
source_files_sampled245
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
724commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
21releases
1bus factor
9open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'disarm-fuzz' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10
6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 11:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
8SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iopyo30.29.0Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1Cargo.toml
crates.ioaho-corasick1Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags2Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iophf0.13Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-segmentation1Cargo.toml
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iochardetng1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioidna1Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.18Cargo.toml
crates.iolibfuzzer-sys0.4fuzz/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1fuzz/Cargo.toml
crates.iodisarm—fuzz/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 278

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 264 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaho-corasick—direct
crates.iobitflags—direct
crates.iochardetng—direct
crates.iodisarm—direct
crates.ioencoding_rs—direct
crates.ioidna—direct
crates.iolibfuzzer-sys—direct
crates.iolog—direct
crates.iophf—direct
crates.iopyo3—direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iounicode-normalization—direct
crates.iounicode-segmentation—direct
crates.iocriterion—indirect
crates.ioiai-callgrind—indirect
crates.iomagnus—indirect
crates.ionapi—indirect
crates.ionapi-build—indirect
crates.ionapi-derive—indirect
crates.iophf_codegen—indirect
crates.ioproptest—indirect
crates.iostats_alloc—indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/ansi2.0.7indirect
npm@inquirer/checkbox5.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/confirm6.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/core11.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/editor5.2.2indirect
npm@inquirer/expand5.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/external-editor3.0.3indirect
npm@inquirer/figures2.0.7indirect
npm@inquirer/input5.1.2indirect
npm@inquirer/number4.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/password5.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/prompts8.5.2indirect
npm@inquirer/rawlist5.3.1indirect
npm@inquirer/search4.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/select5.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/type4.0.7indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/cli3.7.2indirect
npm@napi-rs/cross-toolchain1.0.3indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm-eabi1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-arm641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-x641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-freebsd-x641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-musl1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-ppc64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-riscv64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-s390x-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-musl1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-wasm32-wasi1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-arm64-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-ia32-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-x64-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-android-arm-eabi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-android-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-darwin-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-darwin-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-freebsd-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-wasm32-wasi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-ia32-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-x64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm-eabi1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-arm641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-x641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-freebsd-x641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-musl1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-gnu1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-musl1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-wasm32-wasi1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-ia32-msvc1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-x64-msvc1.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-request-log6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.10indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/rest22.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.9indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchardet2.1.1indirect
npmcli-width4.1.0indirect
npmclipanion4.0.0-rc.4indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmemnapi1.11.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmes-toolkit1.47.1indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npmjs-yaml4.2.0indirect
npmjson-with-bigint3.5.8indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmute-stream3.0.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.4indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypanion3.14.0indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvitest4.1.9indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
PyPIanyascii0.3.3indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIdisarm—indirect
PyPIdisarm0.11.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.2indirect
PyPIftfy6.3.1indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.0.2indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.156.6indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImaturin1.14.0indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs—indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocstrings—indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.4indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.3indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpathvalidate3.3.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions—indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyperf2.10.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.2.1indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIregex2026.5.9indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.10indirect
PyPIruff0.15.21indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsybil10.0.1indirect
PyPIsybil9.3.0indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIunidecode1.4.0indirect
PyPIuroman1.3.1.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.2.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with raeq/disarm. Read them side by side →

92jawah/charset_normalizerTruly universal encoding detector in pure Python.Excellent92google/zerocopyZerocopy makes zero-cost memory manipulation effortless. We write `unsafe` so you don’t have to.Excellent97cure53/DOMPurifyDOMPurify - a DOM-only, super-fast, uber-tolerant XSS sanitizer for HTML, MathML and SVG. DOMPurify works with a secure default, but offers a lot of configurability and hooks. Demo:Exceptional91javascript-obfuscator/javascript-obfuscatorA powerful obfuscator for JavaScript and Node.jsExcellent8910up/safe-svgEnable SVG uploads and sanitize them to stop XML/SVG vulnerabilities in your WordPress website.Excellent99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.