Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-26 10:36 UTC

reactiveui / Splat.DI.SourceGenerator

A source generator that produces Splat dependency injection registrations at compile time. Constructor and property injection are resolved without runtime reflection, with analyzers and code fixes and full native AOT support.

C#MIT★ 37 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗

reactiveui/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (55/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ReactiveUIOrganization · verified domain
297 followers26 public repossince Sep 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSplat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer3.0.0-40 days agosystem.reactivesplatdependencyinjection
NuGetSplat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator3.0.0-260 days agosystem.reactivesplatdependencyinjection

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume — 33 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share0.35
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 26 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~204.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv3.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases204.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/60Stars — 37 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars37
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
50.9/80Total downloads — 79,343 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSplat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer, Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads79,343
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.872
How it's scored
39.5/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
15.9/30PR acceptance — 169/319 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs169
open_issues1
closed_issues16
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.941
closed_unmerged_prs150
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
17.8/25Owner reach — 297 followers of reactiveui
22.4/25Track record — 26 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers297
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginreactiveui
public_repos26
account_age_days5,127

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 26 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSplat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer, Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdependency-injection, c-sharp
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6/7.5Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
1/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.2

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 31 of 35 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.886
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes21,852
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.csproj, src/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator.csproj, src/benchmarks/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator.Benchmarks/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator.Benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 65 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestssrc/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.csproj, src/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator.csproj, src/benchmarks/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator.Benchmarks/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator.Benchmarks.csproj, src/tests/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator.TestApp/Splat.DI.SourceGenerator.TestApp.csproj, src/tests/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.Tests/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.Tests.csproj, src/tests/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator.Tests/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.65
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/188 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes28,602
source_files_sampled188
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

37GitHub stars
5contributors
33commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
26releases
1bus factor
1open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

2334455522023-052025-012026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 3

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-26 10:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
2SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—src/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—src/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—src/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer/Splat.DependencyInjection.Analyzer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—src/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—src/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator/Splat.DependencyInjection.SourceGenerator.csproj
All dependencies 11

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—direct
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net100—indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net80—indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net90—indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—indirect
NuGetReactiveUI—indirect
NuGetReactiveUI.SourceGenerators—indirect
NuGetSplat—indirect
NuGetTUnit—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.