Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-03 19:16 UTC

reyamira / pass-cli

A secure, cross-platform, always-free, and open-source alternative to 1password, bitwarden, etc., Password and API key manager for folks who live in the command line. (CLI + TUI)

GoApache-2.0★ 104 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#1password #bitwarden-cli #password #passwords #secret-manager #secrets #secrets-management #api-key-management #api-keys #cli #tui

reyamira/pass-cli holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (38/100). It was last updated 50 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

reyamiraOrganization

2 followers7 public repossince Dec 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/arimxyer/pass-clipoints to another repo — not scored	v0.20.0	-	37	63 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

58Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 50 days ago
12.5/36	Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 941 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	941
human_commit_share	0.85
days_since_last_push	50
active_weeks_last_year	18

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 37 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 63 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~19.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	37
latest_release_tag	v0.20.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	63
mean_days_between_releases	19.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

37Weak

How it's scored

32.7/60	Stars — 104 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	104
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good

How it's scored

33.1/42	Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
23.9/30	PR acceptance — 101/127 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	101
open_issues	4
closed_issues	15
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.789
closed_unmerged_prs	26
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
3.4/25	Owner reach — 2 followers of reyamira
8/25	Track record — 7 public repos, account ~0 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	reyamira
public_repos	7
account_age_days	266

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://reyamira.github.io/pass-cli/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 11 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	1password, bitwarden-cli, password, passwords, secret-manager, secrets, secrets-management, api-key-management, api-keys, cli, tui
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://reyamira.github.io/pass-cli/
docs_site	https://reyamira.github.io/pass-cli/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	5.2

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.53.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	5
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	49
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 49 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, docs/05-operations/agent.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 80 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.941
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md, docs/05-operations/agent.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	4,611

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

79Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 73 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 12 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.73
toolchain_manifests	docsite/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.12

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/213 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	78,092
source_files_sampled	213
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

104GitHub stars

1contributors

941commits, last 12 months

50days since last push

37releases

1bus factor

4open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
go package 'github.com/arimxyer/pass-cli' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arimxyer/pass-cli); excluded from ecosystem scoring
Could not fetch go package 'github.com/arimxyer/pass-cli/docsite' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 4Patch 5

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-03 19:16 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 19

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/atotto/clipboard	`v0.1.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.18.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gdamore/tcell/v2	`v2.13.10`	go.mod
Go	github.com/howeyc/gopass	`v0.0.0-20210920133722-c8aef6fb66ef`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mdp/qrterminal/v3	`v3.2.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter	`v1.1.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.2.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pquerna/otp	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rivo/tview	`v0.42.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/skip2/go-qrcode	`v0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686e`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.21.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/tyler-smith/go-bip39	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/zalando/go-keyring	`v0.2.8`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.53.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.46.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.44.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod

All dependencies 49

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/atotto/clipboard	`v0.1.4`	direct
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.18.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gdamore/tcell/v2	`v2.13.10`	direct
Go	github.com/howeyc/gopass	`v0.0.0-20210920133722-c8aef6fb66ef`	direct
Go	github.com/mdp/qrterminal/v3	`v3.2.1`	direct
Go	github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter	`v1.1.4`	direct
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.2.4`	direct
Go	github.com/pquerna/otp	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/rivo/tview	`v0.42.0`	direct
Go	github.com/skip2/go-qrcode	`v0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686e`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.21.0`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	github.com/tyler-smith/go-bip39	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/zalando/go-keyring	`v0.2.8`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.53.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.46.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.44.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/boombuler/barcode	`v1.0.1-0.20190219062509-6c824513bacc`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/displaywidth	`v0.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2	`v2.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/danieljoos/wincred	`v1.2.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gdamore/encoding	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2	`v2.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/imfing/hextra	`v0.11.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.19`	indirect
Go	github.com/olekukonko/cat	`v0.0.0-20250911104152-50322a0618f6`	indirect
Go	github.com/olekukonko/errors	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/olekukonko/ll	`v0.1.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero	`v0.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sourcegraph/conc	`v0.3.1-0.20240121214520-5f936abd7ae8`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/subosito/gotenv	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.4`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	indirect
Go	rsc.io/qr	`v0.2.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 49 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.53.0`	direct	unknown	4	`0.56.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records