Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 23:29 UTC

reyxbo / reykit-py

General-purpose utility method integration package.

PythonMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#async#decorator#dll-injection#email#image#kit#log#net#os#random#regex#rey#reyxbo#schedule#stdout#system#table#text#thred#time

reyxbo/reykit-py holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (45/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (15/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

reyxboPersonal account
1 follower8 public repossince Aug 2022

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIreykit1.2.872,1951979 days agoasyncdecoratordll-injectionemailimagekitlognetosrandomregexreyreyxboschedulestdoutsystemtabletextthreadtime

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 9 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 114 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year114
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year25

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.6/80Monthly downloads — 2,195 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesreykit
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,195
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

32At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

34At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of reyxbo
15.1/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginreyxbo
public_repos8
account_age_days1,495
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history — 197 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesreykit
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.reyxbo.com/release/python/reykit
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsasync, decorator, dll-injection, email, image, kit, log, net, os, random, regex, rey, reyxbo, schedule, stdout, system, table, text, thred, time
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.reyxbo.com/release/python/reykit
docs_sitehttps://www.reyxbo.com/release/python/reykit
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

26At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 58 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages57
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:reykit@1.2.87 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 57 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

15Critical · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

11Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes51,992
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
114commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • pypi download statistics for 'reykit' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for reykit carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 23:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities58 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiohttp—pyproject.toml
PyPIapscheduler—pyproject.toml
PyPIbcrypt—pyproject.toml
PyPIcaptcha—pyproject.toml
PyPIconcurrent-log-handler—pyproject.toml
PyPIfiletype—pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyzbar—pyproject.toml
PyPIpdfplumber—pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil—pyproject.toml
PyPIpymem—pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-docx—pyproject.toml
PyPIqrcode—pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests_cache—pyproject.toml
PyPIreydb—pyproject.toml
PyPIvarname—pyproject.toml
PyPIPillow—pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT—pyproject.toml
All dependencies 62

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.13.3direct
PyPIapscheduler3.11.2direct
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0direct
PyPIcaptcha0.7.1direct
PyPIconcurrent-log-handler0.9.29direct
PyPIfiletype1.2.0direct
PyPIpandas3.0.1direct
PyPIpdfplumber0.11.9direct
PyPIpillow12.1.1direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.2direct
PyPIpyjwt2.12.1direct
PyPIpymem1.14.0direct
PyPIpython-docx1.2.0direct
PyPIpyzbar0.1.9direct
PyPIqrcode8.2direct
PyPIrequests2.32.5direct
PyPIrequests-cache1.3.1direct
PyPIreydb1.3.35direct
PyPIvarname0.15.1direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIcattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.5indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.5indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.3.2indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIlxml6.0.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.3indirect
PyPIpdfminer-six20251230indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIportalocker3.2.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIpsycopg3.3.3indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpypdfium25.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIreykit1.2.42indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.42indirect
PyPIsqlmodel0.0.37indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIurl-normalize2.2.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:reykit@1.2.87 pulls in 57 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with reyxbo/reykit-py. Read them side by side →

96palantir/blueprintA React-based UI toolkit for the webExceptional91xtekky/gpt4freeThe official gpt4free repository | various collection of powerful language models | opus 4.6 gpt 5.3 kimi 2.5 deepseek v3.2 gemini 3Excellent97rust-lang/libcRaw bindings to platform APIs for RustExceptional94awslabs/shuttleShuttle is a library for testing concurrent Rust codeExceptional94linebender/parleyRich text layout libraryExceptional94vega/vegaA visualization grammar.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.