Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 01:48 UTC

ronkok / Temml

TeX-to-MathML conversion library in JavaScript

JavaScript · HTMLMIT★ 353 stars⑂ 26 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗

ronkok/Temml holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated 35 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ron KokPersonal account

33 followers4 public repossince Dec 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	temml	0.13.5	3,317,716	50	35 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

62Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 35 days ago
15.9/36	Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18	Commit volume — 92 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	92
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	35
active_weeks_last_year	23

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 67 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 35 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~45.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	67
latest_release_tag	v0.13.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	35
mean_days_between_releases	45.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate

How it's scored

41.3/60	Stars — 353 stars
11.7/25	Forks — 26 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	26
stars	353
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 3,317,716 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	temml
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	3,317,716
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.988

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good

How it's scored

37.4/42	Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
18.8/30	PR acceptance — 10/16 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	10
open_issues	13
closed_issues	106
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.891
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

48Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11/25	Owner reach — 33 followers of ronkok
17.1/25	Track record — 4 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	33
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	ronkok
public_repos	4
account_age_days	3,937

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 35 days ago
20/20	Version history — 50 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	temml
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	35

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

46Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://temml.org/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	latex, math, javascript
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://temml.org/
docs_site	https://temml.org/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

28At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	2.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	35
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	177
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 6, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 177 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

2Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.1/40	Legible commit history — 4 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.04
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

51Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
50.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 9/122 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	1,173,890
source_files_sampled	122
oversized_source_files	9

Key facts

353GitHub stars

8contributors

92commits, last 12 months

35days since last push

67releases

1bus factor

13open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 26 ⇿

0Stars

26Forks

67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 5Patch 62

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10

2.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-03 01:48 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	12 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	29 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 177

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 177 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.21.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.4.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`0.17.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`3.3.4`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`9.39.3`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`2.1.7`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@gar/promise-retry	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.7`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/fs-minipass	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.11`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/agent	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/fs	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@npmcli/redact	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	abbrev	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	cacache	`20.0.4`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	chownr	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	env-paths	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`9.39.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`8.4.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	esm	`3.2.25`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	exponential-backoff	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fs-minipass	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	globals	`15.15.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-cache-semantics	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.2.7`	indirect
npm	make-fetch-happen	`15.0.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	minipass	`3.3.6`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	minipass-collect	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	minipass-fetch	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	minipass-flush	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	minipass-pipeline	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	minipass-sized	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	minizlib	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	node-gyp	`12.2.0`	indirect
npm	nopt	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-map	`7.0.4`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	proc-log	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.4`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	smart-buffer	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	socks	`2.8.7`	indirect
npm	socks-proxy-agent	`8.0.5`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	ssri	`13.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	tar	`7.5.13`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.46.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.15`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	which	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 177 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	7	`5.0.12`
brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect	high	7	`5.0.12`
http-cache-semantics	`4.2.0`	indirect	high	1	—
js-yaml	`4.1.1`	indirect	high	4	`4.3.2`
tar	`7.5.13`	indirect	high	6	`7.5.21`
ws	`8.20.0`	indirect	high	2	`8.21.0`
@humanfs/node	`0.16.7`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.16.8`
ip-address	`10.1.0`	indirect	moderate	5	`10.7.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records