Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 01:23 UTC

ruby-oauth / oauth2

🔐 oauth2 - A Ruby wrapper for the OAuth 2.0, & 2.1 Authorization Frameworks, including OpenID Connect (OIDC)

RubyCustom license★ 2,180 stars⑂ 627 forkssince Apr 2010View on GitHub ↗

#authentication #authorization #oauth2 #oauth2-client #security #oidc #oidc-client

ruby-oauth/oauth2 holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (95/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (68/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ruby OAuthOrganization

23 followers10 public repossince Dec 2008

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
RubyGems	oauth2	2.0.25	-	79	7 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
23.5/36	Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 427 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	427
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	34

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~33.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	16
latest_release_tag	v2.0.25
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	7
mean_days_between_releases	33.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

86Excellent

How it's scored

54.2/60	Stars — 2,180 stars
23.3/25	Forks — 627 forks
8.5/15	Watchers — 35 watchers

Inputs used

forks	627
stars	2,180
watchers	35
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

79Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Total downloads — 268,601,956 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	oauth2
dependents	—
ecosystems	rubygems
total_downloads	268,601,956
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

41Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 62% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 55 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	98
top_contributor_share	0.617

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
19.3/30	PR acceptance — 323/503 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	323
open_issues	0
closed_issues	228
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	180
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
9.9/25	Owner reach — 23 followers of ruby-oauth
19.6/25	Track record — 10 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	23
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	ruby-oauth
public_repos	10
account_age_days	6,430

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20	Version history — 79 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	oauth2
ecosystems	rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 36 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rubocop.yml
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://oauth2.galtzo.com/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	authentication, authorization, oauth2, oauth2-client, security, oidc, oidc-client
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://oauth2.galtzo.com/
docs_site	https://oauth2.galtzo.com/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 55 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	6.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	142
unassessed_packages	23
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

52Moderate

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6.5/40	Legible commit history — 12 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.122
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	10,617

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 16 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Gemfile.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.16
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Code legibility for models

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
52.3/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/41 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	93,868
source_files_sampled	41
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,180GitHub stars

98contributors

427commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

16releases

1bus factor

0open issues

RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 2,180 ★ / 627 ⇿

2,180Stars

627Forks

13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 13

Each point covers 15 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10

6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 01:23 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 55 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	nomono	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	irb	`~> 1.17`	Gemfile

All dependencies 165

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
RubyGems	irb	`1.18.0`	direct
RubyGems	nomono	`1.0.8`	direct
RubyGems	addressable	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	addressable	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	anonymous_loader	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	anonymous_loader	`0.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ansi	`1.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	appraisal2	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	appraisal2	`3.1.4`	indirect
RubyGems	appraisal2-rubocop	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ast	`2.4.3`	indirect
RubyGems	auth-sanitizer	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	auth-sanitizer	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	backports	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	backports	`3.25.3`	indirect
RubyGems	base64	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	benchmark	`0.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`4.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	bundler-audit	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	bundler-audit	`0.9.3`	indirect
RubyGems	cgi	`0.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	cmdparse	`3.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.7`	indirect
RubyGems	date	`3.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	debug	`1.11.1`	indirect
RubyGems	delegate	`0.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	diff-lcs	`1.6.2`	indirect
RubyGems	diffy	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-configurable	`1.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-core	`1.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-inflector	`1.3.1`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-initializer	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-logic	`1.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-schema	`1.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-types	`1.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	emoji_regex	`15.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	erb	`6.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday	`2.14.3`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday-net_http	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	gem_bench	`2.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	geom2d	`0.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	gitmoji-regex	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	gitmoji-regex	`2.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	hashie	`5.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	hexapdf	`1.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	io-console	`0.8.2`	indirect
RubyGems	json	`2.21.1`	indirect
RubyGems	jwt	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	jwt	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-dev	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-dev	`2.3.4`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-rb	`0.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-soup-cover	`3.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-test	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-test	`2.0.10`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown	`2.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown-parser-gfm	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	language_server-protocol	`3.17.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	lint_roller	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	multi_xml	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	multi_xml	`0.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	mutex_m	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	net-http	`0.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	nkf	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	nkf	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nokogiri	`1.19.4`	indirect
RubyGems	openssl	`4.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	ostruct	`0.6.3`	indirect
RubyGems	parallel	`1.28.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parallel_tests	`5.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parser	`3.3.11.1`	indirect
RubyGems	pp	`0.6.4`	indirect
RubyGems	prettyprint	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	prism	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	psych	`5.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`7.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	racc	`1.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rack	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rack	`3.2.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rainbow	`3.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`13.4.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rbs	`4.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	rdoc	`6.17.0`	indirect
RubyGems	reek	`6.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	regexp_parser	`2.12.0`	indirect
RubyGems	reline	`0.6.3`	indirect
RubyGems	require_bench	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	require_bench	`1.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec	`3.13.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-block_is_expected	`1.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-core	`3.13.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-expectations	`3.13.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-mocks	`3.13.8`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-pending_for	`0.1.21`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-stubbed_env	`1.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-support	`3.13.7`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec_junit_formatter	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop	`1.87.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-ast	`1.50.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-capybara	`2.23.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-env	`0.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-factory_bot	`2.28.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-gradual	`0.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-lts	`8.3.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-lts-rspec	`1.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-md	`2.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-minitest	`0.39.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-on-rbs	`2.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-packaging	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-performance	`1.26.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rake	`0.7.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec	`3.10.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec-extra	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec_rails	`2.32.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-ruby2_2	`3.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-thread_safety	`0.7.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-progressbar	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-progressbar	`1.13.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby_engine	`2.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby_version	`1.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	silent_stream	`1.0.12`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov	`1.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-cobertura	`4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-console	`0.9.5`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-rcov	`0.3.7`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov_lcov_formatter	`0.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	snaky_hash	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	snaky_hash	`2.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	standard	`1.55.0`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-custom	`1.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-performance	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-rspec	`0.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-rubocop-lts	`2.0.10`	indirect
RubyGems	stone_checksums	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	stone_checksums	`1.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	stringio	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	strscan	`3.1.8`	indirect
RubyGems	terminal-table	`4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	thor	`1.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	timecop	`0.9.11`	indirect
RubyGems	timecop-rspec	`1.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	tsort	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	turbo_tests2	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	turbo_tests2	`3.1.8`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-display_width	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-emoji	`4.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	uri	`1.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	version_gem	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	version_gem	`1.1.14`	indirect
RubyGems	webrick	`1.9.2`	indirect
RubyGems	yaml-converter	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	yard	`0.9.45`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-fence	`0.9.6`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-junk	`0.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-relative_markdown_links	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-timekeeper	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-yaml	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`2.8.2`	indirect
RubyGems	zlib	`3.2.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records