Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 14:45 UTC

ryota2357 / lean_string

Compact, clone-on-write string for Rust.

RustMIT★ 12 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗

ryota2357/lean_string holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated 20 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ryota2357Personal account
35 followers94 public repossince Feb 2020The University of Electro-Communications

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iolean_string0.7.0138,9231444 days agocowssostringdata-structuresno-std
crates.iobenchpoints to another repo — not scored1.1.05121963 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 20 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18Commit volume62 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year62
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push20
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases14 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 44 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~64.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv0.7.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release44
mean_days_between_releases64.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.9/60Stars12 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars12
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
68.6/80Monthly downloads138,923 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageslean_string
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads868,707
monthly_downloads138,923
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.984
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance5/6 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.2/25Owner reach35 followers of ryota2357
25/25Track record94 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers35
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginryota2357
public_repos94
account_age_days2,382
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslean_string
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configCargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://crates.io/crates/lean_string
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdata-structures, rust, string, no-std
has_wikino
homepagehttps://crates.io/crates/lean_string
docs_sitehttps://crates.io/crates/lean_string
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
2.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages83
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 83 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, bench/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configCargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice12 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.12
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, bench/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes1/30 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes61,938
source_files_sampled30
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

12GitHub stars
3contributors
62commits, last 12 months
20days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'bench' points at a different repository (https://github.com/AlexanderThaller/bench-rs); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412024-112025-092026-07
Major 0Minor 6Patch 7

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 14:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioitoa1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iozmij1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iocastaway0.2.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioarbitrary1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_core1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioduplicate2.0.1bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iocriterion0.8bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iolean_stringbench/Cargo.toml
crates.iolean_string_prev=0.7.0bench/Cargo.toml
crates.iocompact_str=0.10.0bench/Cargo.toml
crates.ioecow=0.3.0bench/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 93

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioarbitrarydirect
crates.iocastawaydirect
crates.iocastaway0.2.4direct
crates.iocompact_str0.10.0direct
crates.iocriterion0.8.2direct
crates.ioduplicate2.0.1direct
crates.ioecow0.3.0direct
crates.ioitoadirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18direct
crates.iolean_string0.7.0direct
crates.ioserde_coredirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229direct
crates.iozmijdirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioalloca0.4.0indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.2indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.8.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.33indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.33indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.33indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.ioloomindirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopage_size0.6.0indirect
crates.iopasteindirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioproc-macro2-diagnostics0.10.1indirect
crates.ioproptestindirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.16indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserdeindirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iostatic_assertions1.1.0indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.3indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.126indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.55indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.55indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 83 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.