Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 18:21 UTC

safe-global / safe-transaction-service

Keeps track of transactions sent via Safe contacts and confirmed transactions. It also keeps track of Ether and ERC20 token transfers to Safe contracts.

PythonCustom license★ 236 stars⑂ 343 forkssince Jul 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined
#ethereum#gnosis#gnosis-safe#multisig#backend

safe-global/safe-transaction-service holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (68/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Safe Labs GmbHOrganization · verified domain
1,173 followers46 public repossince Apr 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 255 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year255
human_commit_share0.78
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv6.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases12.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good
How it's scored
38.5/60Stars — 236 stars
21.1/25Forks — 343 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks343
stars236
watchers15
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

71Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.84

Issue & PR responsiveness

95Exceptional
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 2,010/2,269 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs2,010
open_issues21
closed_issues649
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.969
closed_unmerged_prs259
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

93Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
22.1/25Owner reach — 1,173 followers of safe-global
21.1/25Track record — 46 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,173
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginsafe-global
public_repos46
account_age_days1,622

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsethereum, gnosis, gnosis-safe, multisig, backend
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

74Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

73Good
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: django 5.2.15 (moderate 6.5), djangorestframework 3.17.1 (moderate 5.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories27
affected_packages5
assessed_packages180
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 180 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.safe.global/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 73 of 78 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.safe.global/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.936
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,811

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 22 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.22

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 12/431 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes575,819
source_files_sampled431
oversized_source_files12

Key facts

236GitHub stars
40contributors
255commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
21open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-05-27: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 236 stars today.
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'safe-transaction-service' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 233 ★ / 343 ⇿
233Stars
343Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-05-27. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

05010015020025030023330092018-072022-082026-09
Major 2Minor 58Patch 40

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 18:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIboto3>=1.43.59pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools==7.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIcelery==5.6.3pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango>=5.2.13,<5.3pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-cache-memoize==0.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-celery-beat==2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-cors-headers==4.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar—pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar-force—pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-environ==0.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-extensions==4.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-filter==25.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-imagekit==6.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-model-utils==5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-redis==6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-s3-storage==0.15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-timezone-field==7.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework==3.17.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework-camel-case==1.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdocutils==0.23pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-spectacular==0.30.0pyproject.toml
PyPIflower==2.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIgunicorn==26.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIorjson==3.11.9pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=21.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow==12.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg==3.3.4pyproject.toml
PyPIredis==7.4.1pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.34.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsafe-eth-py==7.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIweb3==7.16.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcachecontrol==0.14.4pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-auth==2.56.2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 180

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 147 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIboto31.43.59direct
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4direct
PyPIcachetools7.1.6direct
PyPIcelery5.6.3direct
PyPIdjango5.2.15direct
PyPIdjango-cache-memoize0.2.1direct
PyPIdjango-celery-beat2.9.0direct
PyPIdjango-cors-headers4.9.0direct
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar6.3.0direct
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar-force0.2direct
PyPIdjango-environ0.14.0direct
PyPIdjango-extensions4.1direct
PyPIdjango-filter25.2direct
PyPIdjango-imagekit6.1.0direct
PyPIdjango-model-utils5.0.0direct
PyPIdjango-redis6.0.0direct
PyPIdjango-s3-storage0.15.0direct
PyPIdjango-timezone-field7.2.2direct
PyPIdjangorestframework3.17.1direct
PyPIdjangorestframework-camel-case1.4.2direct
PyPIdocutils0.23direct
PyPIdrf-spectacular0.30.0direct
PyPIflower2.0.1direct
PyPIgoogle-auth2.56.2direct
PyPIgunicorn26.0.0direct
PyPIorjson3.11.9direct
PyPIpackaging26.2direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4direct
PyPIredis7.4.1direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIsafe-eth-py7.24.0direct
PyPIweb37.16.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIamqp5.3.1indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.1indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbilliard4.2.4indirect
PyPIbitarray3.8.1indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.59indirect
PyPIcached-property2.0.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIckzg2.1.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.1indirect
PyPIclick-didyoumean0.3.1indirect
PyPIclick-plugins1.1.1.2indirect
PyPIclick-repl0.3.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcron-descriptor1.4.5indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcytoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.2indirect
PyPIdjango-appconf1.2.0indirect
PyPIdjango-nine0.2.7indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs6.0.7indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs-ext6.0.5indirect
PyPIdjango-test-migrations1.5.0indirect
PyPIdocker7.1.0indirect
PyPIeth-abi5.2.0indirect
PyPIeth-account0.13.7indirect
PyPIeth-bloom3.1.0indirect
PyPIeth-hash0.8.0indirect
PyPIeth-keyfile0.8.1indirect
PyPIeth-keys0.7.0indirect
PyPIeth-rlp2.2.0indirect
PyPIeth-typing6.0.0indirect
PyPIeth-utils6.0.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfactory-boy3.3.3indirect
PyPIfaker40.36.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.3indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgevent26.5.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.1indirect
PyPIhexbytes1.3.1indirect
PyPIhiredis3.4.0indirect
PyPIhumanize4.15.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipdb0.13.13indirect
PyPIipython9.15.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkombu5.6.2indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlru-dict1.4.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIparsimonious0.10.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpilkit3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.1indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.25.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-pool3.3.1indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy-ecc8.0.0indirect
PyPIpy-evm0.12.1b1indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-celery1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-django4.12.0indirect
PyPIpytest-docker-tools3.1.9indirect
PyPIpytest-env1.7.0indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures16.4indirect
PyPIpytest-sugar1.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-crontab3.3.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpyunormalize17.0.0indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.5.9indirect
PyPIrlp4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.0indirect
PyPIsafe-pysha31.0.5indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.5indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.7indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.1indirect
PyPItrie3.1.0indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIuritemplate4.2.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvine5.1.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.4.2indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIzope-event6.2indirect
PyPIzope-interface8.5indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 180 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sqlparse0.5.5indirecthigh100.6.0
tornado6.5.7indirecthigh46.5.8
django5.2.15directmoderate76.0.8
djangorestframework3.17.1directmoderate43.17.2
cryptography49.0.0indirectmoderate250.0.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with safe-global/safe-transaction-service. Read them side by side →

83bitpay/bitcoreA full stack for bitcoin and blockchain-based applicationsExcellent98vyperlang/vyperPythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVMExceptional96ccxt/ccxtA unified trading API with more than 100 crypto exchanges and prediction markets in JavaScript / TypeScript / Python / C# / PHP / Go / Java / RustExceptional96hummingbot/hummingbotOpen source software that helps you create and deploy high-frequency crypto trading botsExceptional95trezor/blockbook:blue_book: Trezor address/account balance backend Exceptional95rotki/rotkiA portfolio tracking, analytics, accounting and management application that protects your privacyExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.