Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 02:55 UTC

saturneric / GpgFrontend

A modern, cross-platform OpenPGP tool with a unique dual-engine core: switch freely between the battle-tested GnuPG and a modern, memory-safe Rust rPGP backend. It makes encryption, signing, and key management easier and more trustworthy in everyday privacy workflows.

C++GPL-3.0★ 730 stars⑂ 62 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗

#openpgp #gpg #crypto #decrypt #encrypt #security #security-tools #signature-verification #digital-signature #rust #signature #cpp

saturneric/GpgFrontend holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Saturn&EricPersonal account

46 followers18 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

82Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18/36	Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 956 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	956
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	26

Release discipline

89Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~66 days
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 4 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	39
latest_release_tag	nightly
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	66

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good

How it's scored

46.4/60	Stars — 730 stars
14.9/25	Forks — 62 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	62
stars	730
watchers	8
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.994

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

40/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
26.1/30	PR acceptance — 66/76 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	66
open_issues	8
closed_issues	163
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.953
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12/25	Owner reach — 46 followers of saturneric
21.3/25	Track record — 18 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	46
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	saturneric
public_repos	18
account_age_days	3,671

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://gpgfrontend.bktus.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	openpgp, gpg, crypto, decrypt, encrypt, security, security-tools, signature-verification, digital-signature, rust, signature, cpp
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://gpgfrontend.bktus.com
docs_site	https://gpgfrontend.bktus.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
4.5/7.5	Signed-Releases — 4 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 17 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

68Good

How it's scored

16.1/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: rsa 0.9.10 (moderate 5.9), tar 0.4.45 (moderate), anyhow 1.0.102 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
34.9/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 972 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	29
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	231
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 3, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 231 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — rust/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	rust/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
54.1/55	Manageable file sizes — 9/539 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C++
largest_source_bytes	466,911
source_files_sampled	539
oversized_source_files	9

Key facts

730GitHub stars

8contributors

956commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

39releases

1bus factor

8open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Could not fetch crates package 'gf-rust' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 730 ★ / 62 ⇿

730Stars

62Forks

38Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 2Patch 34

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10

5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 02:55 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10	SAST	SAST tool detected: CodeQL
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
6	Signed-Releases	4 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	17 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.10`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4.29`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	pgp	`0.20.0`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rand	`0.8`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rsa	`0.9.10`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tar	`0.4.45`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	rust/Cargo.toml
crates.io	zeroize	`1.8.2`	rust/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 231

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 221 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	direct
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.10`	direct
crates.io	log	`0.4.29`	direct
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	direct
crates.io	pgp	`0.20.0`	direct
crates.io	rand	`0.8.6`	direct
crates.io	rsa	`0.9.10`	direct
crates.io	tar	`0.4.45`	direct
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	direct
crates.io	zeroize	`1.8.2`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	aead	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	aes	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	aes-gcm	`0.10.3`	indirect
crates.io	aes-kw	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	argon2	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	base16ct	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	base64ct	`1.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	bitfields	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	bitfields-impl	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitvec	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	blake2	`0.10.6`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	block-padding	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	blowfish	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	buffer-redux	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	bzip2	`0.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	camellia	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	cast5	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	cbindgen	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	cfb-mode	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	cipher	`0.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	cmac	`0.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	const-oid	`0.9.6`	indirect
crates.io	convert_case	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	crc24	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-bigint	`0.5.5`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	ctr	`0.9.2`	indirect
crates.io	curve25519-dalek	`4.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	curve25519-dalek-derive	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	cx448	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	darling	`0.20.11`	indirect
crates.io	darling_core	`0.20.11`	indirect
crates.io	darling_macro	`0.20.11`	indirect
crates.io	dbl	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	der	`0.7.10`	indirect
crates.io	derive_builder	`0.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	derive_builder_core	`0.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	derive_builder_macro	`0.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	derive_more	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	derive_more-impl	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	des	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	dsa	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	eax	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	ecdsa	`0.16.9`	indirect
crates.io	ed25519	`2.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	elliptic-curve	`0.13.8`	indirect
crates.io	env_filter	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	ff	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	fiat-crypto	`0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	filetime	`0.2.28`	indirect
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	funty	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	ghash	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	group	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hex	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	hkdf	`0.12.4`	indirect
crates.io	hmac	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	hybrid-array	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	hybrid-array	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	idea	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	ident_case	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	inout	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jiff	`0.2.24`	indirect
crates.io	jiff-static	`0.2.24`	indirect
crates.io	k256	`0.13.4`	indirect
crates.io	keccak	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	kem	`0.3.0-pre.0`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	libbz2-rs-sys	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	md-5	`0.10.6`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	ml-dsa	`0.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	ml-kem	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`8.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint-dig	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-iter	`0.1.45`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	num_enum	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	num_enum_derive	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	ocb3	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	opaque-debug	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	p256	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	p384	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	p521	`0.13.3`	indirect
crates.io	password-hash	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	pem-rfc7468	`0.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	pkcs1	`0.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	pkcs8	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	polyval	`0.6.2`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic-util	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	primeorder	`0.13.6`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	radium	`0.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.12.3`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.10`	indirect
crates.io	replace_with	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	rfc6979	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	ripemd	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	rustc_version	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	sec1	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.149`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	serdect	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	serdect	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	sha1	`0.10.6`	indirect
crates.io	sha1-checked	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.9`	indirect
crates.io	sha3	`0.10.9`	indirect
crates.io	signature	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	slh-dsa	`0.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	snafu	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	snafu-derive	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	spin	`0.9.8`	indirect
crates.io	spki	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	tap	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`0.9.12+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`0.7.5+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_parser	`1.1.2+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_writer	`1.1.1+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	twofish	`0.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.20.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`1.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-xid	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	universal-hash	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.3+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasip3	`0.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`0.7.15`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-component	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wyz	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	x25519-dalek	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	xattr	`1.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.7.35`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.48`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.7.35`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.48`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize_derive	`1.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	zlib-rs	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.14.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 231 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
aiohttp	`3.13.5`	indirect	high	22	`3.14.1`
rsa	`0.9.10`	direct	moderate	1	—
tar	`0.4.45`	direct	moderate	1	`0.4.46`
ml-dsa	`0.0.4`	indirect	moderate	4	`0.1.0-rc.5`
anyhow	`1.0.102`	direct	unknown	1	`1.0.103`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records