Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-29 13:23 UTC

schettino72 / sphinx_press_theme

A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

Vue · HTML · StylusCustom license★ 120 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Jul 2018View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

#documentation-tool #sphinx-theme #sphinx #vuejs

schettino72/sphinx_press_theme holds a health index of 20 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (58/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 877 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

eduardo naufel schettinoPersonal account

81 followers67 public repossince Oct 2009Asserto AI

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	sphinx_press_theme	0.9.1	166,428	15	889 days ago	sphinx doc theme vue.js

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 889 daysautomated commits excludedissues left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 877 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	877
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

32At Risk

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 13 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36	Release recency — latest release 889 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~195.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	13
latest_release_tag	0.9.1
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	889
mean_days_between_releases	195.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

51Moderate

How it's scored

33.7/60	Stars — 120 stars
12.5/25	Forks — 33 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	33
stars	120
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

44Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

87Excellent

How it's scored

69.6/80	Monthly downloads — 166,428 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	sphinx_press_theme
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	166,428
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 16 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	10
top_contributor_share	0.674

Issue & PR responsiveness

32At Risk

How it's scored

18.8/42	Issue resolution — 45% of issues closed
9.2/30	PR acceptance — 11/36 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	11
open_issues	26
closed_issues	21
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.447
closed_unmerged_prs	25
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.8/25	Owner reach — 81 followers of schettino72
25/25	Track record — 67 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	81
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	schettino72
public_repos	67
account_age_days	6,165

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 889 days ago
20/20	Version history — 15 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	sphinx_press_theme
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	889

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

41Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	documentation-tool, sphinx-theme, sphinx, vuejs
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
docs_site	https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

17Critical

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 16 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 34 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	1.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	22
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:sphinx_press_theme@0.9.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 22 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

27At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

11Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.7/40	Legible commit history — 20 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.2
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

31At Risk

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — demo/Makefile, docs/Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	demo/Makefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Vue without a type-check config
49.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/10 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Vue
largest_source_bytes	164,207
source_files_sampled	10
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

120GitHub stars

10contributors

0commits, last 12 months

877days since last push

13releases

1bus factor

26open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'sphinx_press_theme' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 33 ⇿

0Stars

33Forks

10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 6Patch 4

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10

1.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-29 13:23 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 16 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	34 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	stylus	`^0.63.0`	ui/package.json
npm	vue	`^3.4.21`	ui/package.json

All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	stylus	`0.63.0`	direct
npm	vue	`3.4.21`	direct
npm	@adobe/css-tools	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.24.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.15`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`5.0.4`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.4.21`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.8`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.38`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.7.4`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	vite	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	-	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:sphinx_press_theme@0.9.1 pulls in 22 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records