Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 05:35 UTC

senad-d / commitme

Generate smart commit messages from git diff with CommitMe, a lightweight Pi extension.

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#cli#commit#commit-message#developer-tools#offline#pi#pi-agent#pi-coding-agent#pi-extension#pi-package#privacy

senad-d/commitme holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Senad DizdarevićPersonal account
3 followers30 public repossince Aug 2022Valcon

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@senad-d/commitme0.2.82,098123 days agopi-packagepi-extensionpi-coding-agentcommit-messageconventional-commitsgitcommitcommitmetypescriptcoding-agent

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

54Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
15.5/18Commit volume — 52 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year52
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 12 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv0.2.8
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,098 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@senad-d/commitme
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,098
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.923

Issue & PR responsiveness

44Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
20/30PR acceptance — 4/6 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs4
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of senad-d
18.6/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsenad-d
public_repos30
account_age_days1,418
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@senad-d/commitme
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, commit, commit-message, developer-tools, offline, pi, pi-agent, pi-coding-agent, pi-extension, pi-package, privacy
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes373
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/31 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes30,013
source_files_sampled31
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
52commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 05:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 196

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 196 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk0.91.1indirect
npm@aws-crypto/crc325.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/sha256-browser5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/sha256-js5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/supports-web-crypto5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/util5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtime3.1048.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.974.11indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.974.22indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.37indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.48indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.39indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.50indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.972.55indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.54indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.57indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.37indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.48indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.972.54indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.54indirect
npm@aws-sdk/eventstream-handler-node3.972.16indirect
npm@aws-sdk/eventstream-handler-node3.972.22indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-eventstream3.972.12indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-eventstream3.972.18indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-websocket3.972.19indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-websocket3.972.30indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.22indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.9indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.27indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.35indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1048.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1071.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.973.13indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.973.8indirect
npm@aws-sdk/util-locate-window3.965.5indirect
npm@aws-sdk/util-locate-window3.965.8indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.24indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.30indirect
npm@aws/lambda-invoke-store0.2.4indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.7indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-agent-core0.80.6indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-ai0.80.6indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent0.80.6indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-tui0.80.6indirect
npm@google/genai1.52.0indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-arm640.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-universal0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-x640.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-arm64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-arm64-musl0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-riscv64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-x64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-x64-musl0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-win32-arm64-msvc0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-win32-x64-msvc0.3.9indirect
npm@mistralai/mistralai2.2.6indirect
npm@nodable/entities2.1.0indirect
npm@nodable/entities2.2.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/api1.9.0indirect
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions1.41.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/aspromise1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/base641.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/codegen2.0.5indirect
npm@protobufjs/eventemitter1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/fetch1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/float1.0.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/path1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/pool1.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/utf81.1.1indirect
npm@silvia-odwyer/photon-node0.3.4indirect
npm@smithy/core3.24.3indirect
npm@smithy/core3.25.1indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.3.3indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.4.1indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.4.3indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.5.1indirect
npm@smithy/is-array-buffer2.2.0indirect
npm@smithy/node-http-handler4.7.3indirect
npm@smithy/node-http-handler4.8.1indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.4.3indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.5.1indirect
npm@smithy/types4.14.2indirect
npm@smithy/types4.15.0indirect
npm@smithy/util-buffer-from2.2.0indirect
npm@smithy/util-utf82.3.0indirect
npm@types/node22.19.19indirect
npm@types/node26.1.1indirect
npm@types/retry0.12.0indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmanynum1.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbignumber.js9.3.1indirect
npmbowser2.14.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmbuffer-equal-constant-time1.0.1indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer4.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdiff8.0.4indirect
npmecdsa-sig-formatter1.0.11indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmfast-xml-builder1.2.0indirect
npmfast-xml-parser5.7.3indirect
npmfetch-blob3.2.0indirect
npmformdata-polyfill4.0.10indirect
npmgaxios7.1.4indirect
npmgaxios7.1.5indirect
npmgcp-metadata8.1.2indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmgoogle-auth-library10.6.2indirect
npmgoogle-auth-library10.7.0indirect
npmgoogle-logging-utils1.1.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhighlight.js10.7.3indirect
npmhosted-git-info9.0.3indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjson-bigint1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-to-ts3.1.1indirect
npmjwa2.0.1indirect
npmjws4.0.1indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.4.0indirect
npmmarked18.0.5indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-domexception1.0.0indirect
npmnode-fetch3.3.2indirect
npmopenai6.26.0indirect
npmp-retry4.6.2indirect
npmpartial-json0.1.7indirect
npmpath-expression-matcher1.5.0indirect
npmpath-expression-matcher1.6.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmproper-lockfile4.1.2indirect
npmprotobufjs7.6.4indirect
npmretry0.12.0indirect
npmretry0.13.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmstrnum2.3.0indirect
npmstrnum2.4.1indirect
npmts-algebra2.0.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypebox1.1.38indirect
npmtypebox1.3.6indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici8.5.0indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmweb-streams-polyfill3.3.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmxml-naming0.1.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmzod3.25.76indirect
npmzod4.4.3indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with senad-d/commitme. Read them side by side →

98QwenLM/qwen-codeAn open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.Exceptional96usebruno/brunoOpensource IDE For Exploring and Testing API's (lightweight alternative to Postman/Insomnia)Exceptional96conventional-changelog/commitlint📓 Lint commit messagesExceptional96Kilo-Org/kilocodeKilo is the all-in-one agentic engineering platform. Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.Exceptional100angular/angular-cliCLI tool for AngularExceptional99go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.